Application Barriers and the Socioeconomic Gap in Child Care Enrollment. Hermes, H., Lergetporer, P., Peter, F., & Wiederhold, S. (2024). Application Barriers and the Socioeconomic Gap in Child Care Enrollment. Journal of the European Economic Association, forthcoming (online first). https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvae054
Abstract
Why are children with lower socioeconomic status (SES) substantially less likely to be enrolled in child care? We study whether barriers in the application process work against lower-SES children — the group known to benefit strongest from child care enrollment. In an RCT in Germany with highly subsidized child care (N = 607), we offer treated families information and personal assistance for applications. We find substantial, equity-enhancing effects of the treatment, closing half of the large SES gap in child care enrollment. Increased enrollment for lower-SES families is likely driven by altered application knowledge and behavior. We discuss scalability of our intervention and derive policy implications for the design of universal child..
|
Ethical aspects using AI in CRIS. Azeroual, O., Schöpfel, J., Störl, U., & Maru¨ić, A. (2024). Ethical aspects using AI in CRIS. Procedia Computer Science, 2024(249), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.11.058
|
Knowledge Graphs – The Future of Integration in CRIS Systems for Uses of Assistance to Scientific Reasoning. Fabre, R., & Azeroual, O. (2024). Knowledge Graphs – The Future of Integration in CRIS Systems for Uses of Assistance to Scientific Reasoning. Procedia Computer Science, 2024(249), 264-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.11.072
|
From Open Repositories to CRIS - A Case Study. Schöpfel, J., Azeroual, O., Chaudiron, S., Jacquemin, B., Kergosien, E., Prost, H., & Thiault, F. (2024). From Open Repositories to CRIS - A Case Study. Procedia Computer Science, 2024(249), 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.11.061
|
Bridging the evidence use gap between higher education research and science studies, policy and practice – Notions and functions of intermediaries. Wegner, A. (2024). Bridging the evidence use gap between higher education research and science studies, policy and practice – Notions and functions of intermediaries. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: Zenodo.
|
Bildungsprozesse im Lebensverlauf: Dynamiken im Erwerb von allgemeinbildenden Bildungsabschlüssen. Ordemann, J., & Maaz, K. (2024). Bildungsprozesse im Lebensverlauf: Dynamiken im Erwerb von allgemeinbildenden Bildungsabschlüssen. In G. Quenzel, K. Hurrelmann, J. Groß Ophoff, & C. Weber (Hrsg.), Handbuch Bildungsarmut (S. 1-24). Wiesbaden: Springer.
|
Gender bias in grant allocation shows a decline over time. van den Besselaar, P., Möller, T., Mom, C., Cruz-Castro, L., & Cruz-Castro, L. (2024). Gender bias in grant allocation shows a decline over time. In STI 2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14176637
|
Are there factors that influence the quality of funding acknowledgements in publications? Möller, T., Scheidt, B., & Meier, A. (2024). Are there factors that influence the quality of funding acknowledgements in publications? In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14174157
|
Evidence base of Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines – A bibliometric comparison of Germany and the UK. Aman, V., & Sorgatz, N. (2024). Evidence base of Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines – A bibliometric comparison of Germany and the UK. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14168202
|
Is academic freedom associated with strong science? Lovakov, A. (2024). Is academic freedom associated with strong science? In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14168639
|
Funding decision and applicants' careers. A case study of an early career grant. Möller, T. (2024). Funding decision and applicants' careers. A case study of an early career grant. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14171970
|
Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond. Tcypina, A. (2024). Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14161803
|
Data inaccuracy quantification and uncertainty propagation for bibliometric indicators. Donner, P. (2024). Data inaccuracy quantification and uncertainty propagation for bibliometric indicators. Research Evaluation, 33. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae047
Abstract
This study introduces an approach to estimate the uncertainty in bibliometric indicator values that is caused by data errors. This approach utilizes Bayesian regression models, estimated from empirical data samples, which are used to predict error-free data. Through direct Monte Carlo simulation—drawing many replicates of predicted data from the estimated regression models for the same input data—probability distributions for indicator values can be obtained which provide the information on their uncertainty due to data errors. [...]
|
Evidence use in higher education decision-making and policy: a scoping review of empirical studies from 2010 to 2022. Thiedig, C., & Wegner, A. (2024). Evidence use in higher education decision-making and policy: a scoping review of empirical studies from 2010 to 2022. London Review of Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.22.1.36
|
Die Forschungs- und Arbeitsbedingungen internationaler Wissenschaftler:innen an deutschen Hochschulen. Fabian, G., & Heger, C. (2024). Die Forschungs- und Arbeitsbedingungen internationaler Wissenschaftler:innen an deutschen Hochschulen. In DAAD/DZHW (Hrsg.), Wissenschaft weltoffen. Daten und Fakten zur Internationalität von Studium und Forschung in Deutschland und weltweit. (S. 82-85). Bielefeld: wbv.
|