Artikel

Leider konnte für diese Suchkombination kein Ergebnis gefunden werden

Review and definition of the term "mobility window".

Ferencz, I., Kupriyanova, V., Netz, N., & Hauschildt, K. (2013).
Review and definition of the term "mobility window". In I. Ferencz, K. Hauschildt & I. Garam (Hrsg.), Mobility windows: From concept to practice (S. 29-36). Bonn: Lemmens.

Setting up mobility windows.

Garam, I., Kupriyanova, V., Ferencz, I., Lam, Q., & Hauschildt, K. (2013).
Setting up mobility windows. In I. Ferencz, K. Hauschildt & I. Garam (Hrsg.), Mobility windows: From concept to practice (S. 52-79). Bonn: Lemmens.

Organising and supporting window mobility.

Schirmer, H., & Hauschildt, K. (2013).
Organising and supporting window mobility. In I. Ferencz, K. Hauschildt & I. Garam (Hrsg.), Mobility windows: From concept to practice (S. 88-99). Bonn: Lemmens.

The evaluation stage.

Hauschildt, K. (2013).
The evaluation stage. In I. Ferencz, K. Hauschildt & I. Garam (Hrsg.), Mobility windows: From concept to practice (S. 100-102). Bonn: Lemmens.

Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100).

Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., & Wang, J. (2013).
Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100). Journal of Informetrics, 7/4, 933-944.

Jugend und Studium.

Kerst, C., & Wolter, A. (2013).
Jugend und Studium. In Y. Kaiser, M. Spenn, M. Freitag, T. Rauschenbach & M. Corsa (Hrsg.), Handbuch Jugend. Evangelische Perspektiven (S. 207-212). Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich.

Bibliometric Evaluation Standards Debate.

Sirtes, D., & Waltman, L. (2013).
Bibliometric Evaluation Standards Debate. In Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, (S. 373-377). Berlin: iFQ.

The characteristics of highly cited non-source items in political science.

Chi, P.-S. (2013).
The characteristics of highly cited non-source items in political science. In S. Hinze & A. Lottmann (Hrsg.), Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Berlin: iFQ.

Collaboration Benefits and International Visibility of Two-Country-Collaborations.

Riechert, M., Sirtes, D., & Lietz, H. (2013).
Collaboration Benefits and International Visibility of Two-Country-Collaborations. In S. Hinze & A. Lottmann (Hrsg.), Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, (S. 303-312). Berlin: iFQ.

The Best Five - Do Authors' Assessments of their own Publications Correspond to Metric Based Rankings?

Schmidt, M., & Neufeld, J. (2013).
The Best Five - Do Authors' Assessments of their own Publications Correspond to Metric Based Rankings? In Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, (S. 335-342). Berlin: iFQ.

(E-Learning-)Innovationen im Lehralltag. Theoriegeleitete Ein- und Ausblicke.

Fischer, H., & Wannemacher, K. (2013).
(E-Learning-)Innovationen im Lehralltag. Theoriegeleitete Ein- und Ausblicke. In C. Bremer & D. Krömker (Hrsg.), E-Learning zwischen Vision und Alltag. Zum Stand der Dinge (S. 85-95). Münster, New York, USA, München, Berlin: Waxmann.

Bildung.

Seeber, S., Wolter, A., Döbert, H., Kerst, C., Becker-Stoll, F., & Seitz, C. (2013).
Bildung. In J. Rump & N. Walter (Hrsg.), Arbeitswelt 2030. Trends, Prognosen, Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten, (S. 93-122). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

Peer review-based selection decisions in individual research funding, applicants publication strategies and performance: The case of the ERC Starting Grants.

Neufeld, J., Huber, N., & Wegner, A. (2013).
Peer review-based selection decisions in individual research funding, applicants publication strategies and performance: The case of the ERC Starting Grants. Research Evaluation, Vol. 22, No. 3, 1-11.

Wirtschaftliche und soziale Situation der Studierenden heute.

Leszczensky, M. (2013).
Wirtschaftliche und soziale Situation der Studierenden heute. In H.-U. Erichsen, J. Zöllner, B. Schäfer & H. Staschen (Hrsg.), Lebensraum Hochschule - Grundfragen einer sozial definierten Bildungspolitik (S. 359-382). Siegburg: Reckinger.

HIS:Magazin 3|2013.

Körner, W., Schneider, H., Scheller, P., Woisch, A., Vogel, B., Ortenburger, A., ... & Benthien, J. (2013).
HIS:Magazin 3|2013. Hannover: HIS.

Kontakt

Anja Gottburgsen
Dr. Anja Gottburgsen 0511 450670-912