Dr. Dimity Stephen studierte Psychologie an der Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australien. Sie arbeitete von 2010 bis 2017 beim Australian Bureau of Statistics zu Ursachen von Mortalität. In 2017 promovierte sie an der Queensland University of Technology in Public Health. Seit Juli 2018 arbeitet sie in der Abteilung Forschungssystem und Wissenschaftsdynamik im Arbeitsbereich Leistungsbewertung und Indikatorik des Deutschen Zentrums für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW) in Berlin.
Dr. Dimity Stephen
Abteilung Forschungssystem und Wissenschaftsdynamik
wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin
- 030 2064177-26
- Google Scholar
- Orcid
Projekte
Liste der Projekte
Publikationen
Liste der Publikationen
Bibliodiversity of small academic publishers: The role of open access for impact and visibility.Cruz Romero, R., Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2025).Bibliodiversity of small academic publishers: The role of open access for impact and visibility. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science (CJILS/RCSIB), 48(1), 146-166. |
Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: A scoping review.Ng, J. Y., Liu, H., Masood, M., Syed, N., Stephen, D., ... & Moher, D. (2025).Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: A scoping review. Quantitative Science Studies, 2025 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss.a.12 |
Guidance List for Reporting Bibliometric Analyses (GLOBAL): A two-round modified Delphi study.Ng, J. Y., Liu, H., Masood, M., Syed, N., Waltman, L., ... & Moher, D. (2025).Guidance List for Reporting Bibliometric Analyses (GLOBAL): A two-round modified Delphi study. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 868-884). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. |
Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research: What can reviewers' comments tell us about reporting completeness?
Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research: What can reviewers' comments tell us about reporting completeness? In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 2199-2206). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. |
Bibliometrics and altmetrics in the context of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine.Ng, J. Y., Stephen, D., Liu, J., Ostermann, T., Robinson, N., & Cramer, H. (2025).Bibliometrics and altmetrics in the context of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine. Integrative Medicine Research, 14(3), 101181 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2025.101181 |
Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable psychology journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality.Stephen, D. (2025).Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable psychology journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality. Journal of Informetrics, 2025(19(2)), 101640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101640 |
Will ChatGPT Get Tenure?Schniedermann, A., Heßelmann, F., Stephen, D., Leckert, M., & Ottaviani, M. (12. Dezember 2024).Will ChatGPT Get Tenure [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://www.leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/will-chatgpt-get-tenure |
Assessing bibliodiversity through reference lists: A text analysis approach.Cruz Romero, R., Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2024).Assessing bibliodiversity through reference lists: A text analysis approach. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024) (S. 1-14). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14045592 Abstract
The presence or absence of publishers in large bibliographic databases highlights tangible and symbolic differences between small and large publishers, underlining their diverging incentive structures. To assess these differences, this contribution explores reference data from small (open access) publishers and their journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. The analysis focuses on references that are not indexed in these databases and examines them from a text-as-data approach. The study frames two dimensions of relevance - visibility and impact - as proxies for assessing the scholarly bibliodiversity represented by small (open access) publishers. |
Contrasting cross-correlation: Meta-analyses of the associations between citations and 13 altmetrics, incorporating moderating variables.Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2024).Contrasting cross-correlation: Meta-analyses of the associations between citations and 13 altmetrics, incorporating moderating variables. Scientometrics (online first). |
Mind the gap: Nowcasting the citation impact of research institutions.Stahlschmidt, S., & Stephen, D. (2023).Mind the gap: Nowcasting the citation impact of research institutions. In ISSI (Hrsg.), Proceedings of ISSI 2023 – the 19th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (S. 441-447). Bloomington, United States: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. |
Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality.Stephen, D. (2023).Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality. In L. Waltman, K. H. Lai, B. Murat, J. Wang, V. Weimer, E. Noyons, & M. Luwel (Hrsg.), 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023). Leiden, Netherlands: orvium.io. https://doi.org/10.55835/644245cb8e703ddb4dc07eda |
Confounding cross-correlation: A meta-analysis of the association between citations and altmetrics.Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2023).Confounding cross-correlation: A meta-analysis of the association between citations and altmetrics. In ISSI (Hrsg.), Proceedings of ISSI 2023 – the 19th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (S. 449-454). Bloomington, United States: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. |
Medical articles in questionable journals are less impactful than those in non-questionable journals but still extensively cited.Stephen, D. (2023).Medical articles in questionable journals are less impactful than those in non-questionable journals but still extensively cited. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04763-w |
Landscape study of small journal publishers for the Knowledge Exchange Task & Finish Group for " Small Publishers and the Transition to Open Access " .Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2022).Landscape study of small journal publishers for the Knowledge Exchange Task & Finish Group for "Small Publishers and the Transition to Open Access". Berlin: DZHW.
|
Comparison of the citations of German medical science articles in questionable and non-questionable journals.Stephen, D. (2022).Comparison of the citations of German medical science articles in questionable and non-questionable journals. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2022), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6975638 |
Vorträge & Tagungen
Liste der Vorträge & Tagungen
Guidance List for repOrting Bibliometric AnaLyses (GLOBAL): A two-round modified Delphi Study.Stephen, D. (2025, Juni).Guidance List for repOrting Bibliometric AnaLyses (GLOBAL): A two-round modified Delphi Study. Vortrag im Rahmen der Ad-hoc-Gruppe GLOBAL auf der Konferenz 20th International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI) Conference, Yerevan, Armenia. |
Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research: What can reviewers’ comments tell us about reporting completeness?
Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research: What can reviewers’ comments tell us about reporting completeness? Vortrag auf der Konferenz 20th International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI) Conference, Yerevan, Armenia. |
Predatory publishing practices: Paper tigers or actual threats from evaluation systems?Stephen, D., & Cramer, M. (2025, Januar).Predatory publishing practices: Paper tigers or actual threats from evaluation systems? Vortrag auf dem Kolloquium RMZ Jour Fixe, Robert K. Merton Zentrum, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin. |
Assessing Bibliodiversity through Reference Lists: A Text Analysis Approach.Cruz Romero, R., Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2024, September).Assessing Bibliodiversity through Reference Lists: A Text Analysis Approach. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin. |
28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024).Frietsch, R., Gauch, S., Hinze, S., Stephen, D., Jacobs, N., ... & Beck, P. (2024, September).28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024), Fraunhofer ISI, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, DZHW, European Network of Idicator Developers, Berlin. |
Improving Transparency and Quality of Bibliometric Methods and Reporting.Haustein, S., Ng, J. Y., Stephen, D., Schniedermann, A., Stahlschmidt, S., ... & Glänzel, W. (2024, September).Session Improving Transparency and Quality of Bibliometric Methods and Reporting auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin, Germany. |
Do we have a reporting issue? First results from analysing peer reviews.Stephen, D. (2024, September).Do we have a reporting issue? First results from analysing peer reviews. Vortrag auf dem Workshop Improving transparency and quality of bibliometric methods and reporting. Special Session at the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024), Berlin, Germany. |
Mind the gap: Nowcasting the citation impact of research institutions.Stahlschmidt, S., & Stephen, D. (2023, November).Mind the gap: Nowcasting the citation impact of research institutions. Vortrag auf dem Kolloquium Departamento de Información y Comunicación, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spanien. |
Neue Daten, neues Wissen? Infrastrukturen der Leistungsbewertung in der Wissenschaft (NeDa).Stephen, D. (2023, Oktober).Neue Daten, neues Wissen? Infrastrukturen der Leistungsbewertung in der Wissenschaft (NeDa). Vortrag auf dem Workshop Abschlusstagung der BMBF-Förderlinie Qualitätsentwicklung(en) in der Wissenschaft, Dortmund. |
Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality.Stephen, D. (2023, Juli).Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI), Leiden, Niederlande. |
Mind the gap: Nowcasting the citation impact of research institutions.Stahlschmidt, S., & Stephen, D. (2023, Juli).Mind the gap: Nowcasting the citation impact of research institutions. Vortrag auf der Konferenz International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI2023), Indiana University, Bloomington, USA. |
Confounding cross-correlation: A meta-analysis of the association between citations and altmetrics.Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2023, Juli).Confounding cross-correlation: A meta-analysis of the association between citations and altmetrics. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 19th International Conference on Scientometrics and Infometrics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA. |
Comparison of the citations of German medical science articles in questionable and non-questionable journals.Stephen, D. (2022, September).Comparison of the citations of German medical science articles in questionable and non-questionable journals. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 26th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI), Granada, Spain. |
