Marion Schmidt
Abteilung Forschungssystem und Wissenschaftsdynamik
wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin
- 030 2064177-32
- Orcid
Wissenschaftliche Forschungsgebiete
Bibliometrie, Wissenschaftsforschung, Evaluation von Forschungspolitik und Institutionen
Liste der Projekte
Liste der Publikationen
Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus.Culbert, J. H., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Haupka, N., Schmidt, M., Donner, P., & Mayr, P. (2025).Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus. Scientometrics (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05293-3 Abstract
OpenAlex is a promising open source of scholarly metadata, and competitor to established proprietary sources, such as the Web of Science and Scopus. As OpenAlex provides its data freely and openly, it permits researchers to perform bibliometric studies that can be reproduced in the community without licensing barriers. However, as OpenAlex is a rapidly evolving source and the data contained within is expanding and also quickly changing, the question naturally arises as to the trustworthiness of its data. In this report, we will study the reference coverage and selected metadata within each database and compare them with each other to help address this open question in bibliometrics. [...] |
Why do some retracted articles continue to get cited?Schmidt, M. (2024).Why do some retracted articles continue to get cited? Scientometrics, 2024 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05147-4 |
Who are the “Heroes of CRISPR”? Public science communication on Wikipedia and the challenge of micro-notability.Simon, A., Kircheis, W., Schmidt, M., Potthast, M., & Stein, B. (2024).Who are the “Heroes of CRISPR”? Public science communication on Wikipedia and the challenge of micro-notability. Public Understanding of Science, 33(7), 918-934. |
Mining the History Sections of Wikipedia Articles on Science and Technology.Kircheis, W., Schmidt, M., Simons, A., Stein, B., & Potthast, M. (2023).Mining the History Sections of Wikipedia Articles on Science and Technology. 23rd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2023), 23 (online first). |
A diachronic perspective on citation latency in Wikipedia articles on CRISPR/Cas-9: an exploratory case study.Schmidt, M., Kircheis, W., Simons, A., Potthast, M., & Stein, B. (2023).A diachronic perspective on citation latency in Wikipedia articles on CRISPR/Cas-9: an exploratory case study. Scientometrics, 2023(128), 3649-3673. |
Does Wikipedia Cover the Relevant Literature on Major Innovations Timely? An Exploratory Case Study of CRISPR/Cas9.Schmidt, M., Kircheis, W., Simons, A., Potthast, M., & Stein, B. (2021).Does Wikipedia Cover the Relevant Literature on Major Innovations Timely? An Exploratory Case Study of CRISPR/Cas9. In W. Glänzel, S. Heeffer, P.-S. Chi, & R. Rousseau (Hrsg.), 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics - Proceedings (S. 1021-1026). Leuven: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (I.S.S.I.). |
A Case Study of the Epistemic Function of Citations - Implications for Citation-based Science Mapping.Seitz, C., Schmidt, M., Schwichtenberg, N., & Velden, T. (2021).A Case Study of the Epistemic Function of Citations - Implications for Citation-based Science Mapping. In W. Glänzel, S. Heeffer, P.-S. Chi, & R. Rousseau (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (S. 1027-1032). Leuven: KU Leuven / International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (I.S.S.I.). Abstract
The use of citations as indicators of topical relatedness of publications is common in the algorithmic mapping of the structure of science. References to source documents, however, may serve a variety of epistemic functions, and hence represent rather different dimensions of topical relatedness, such as the research methods used, the empirical objects studied, the theoretical resources build on, the research questions pursued, or the external motivation for and relevance of the work. In this case study, we explore the diversity in topical dimensions along which publications are linked in citation networks, by coding the epistemic function of in-text citations. [...] |
Measurement variation in bibliometric impact indicators.Stahlschmidt, S., & Schmidt, M. (2019).Measurement variation in bibliometric impact indicators. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 1500-1506). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5. |
An Analysis of the Validity of Retraction Annotation in Pubmed and the Web of Science.Schmidt, M. (2018).An Analysis of the Validity of Retraction Annotation in Pubmed and the Web of Science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 69(2), 318-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23913 |
The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted publications.Hesselmann, F., Graf, V., Schmidt, M., & Reinhart, M. (2017).The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted publications. Current Sociology, Volume: 65 issue: 6, 814-845. |
Assessing the effects of the German Excellence Initiative with Bibliometric Means based on two Data Sources.Möller, T., & Schmidt, M. (2015).Assessing the effects of the German Excellence Initiative with Bibliometric Means based on two Data Sources. In Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2015). Lugano. |
Publikationsanalyse im Web of Science und Scopus.Aman, V., Hinze, S., & Schmidt, M. (2015).Publikationsanalyse im Web of Science und Scopus. In A. Botte, U. Sondergeld & M. Rittberger (Hrsg.), Monitoring Bildungsforschung. Befunde aus dem Forschungsprojekt " Entwicklung und Veränderungsdynamik eines heterogenen sozialwissenschaftlichen Feldes am Beispiel der Bildungsforschung " , (S. 107-174). Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt. |
Evaluation of the citation matching algorithms of CWTS and iFQ in comparison to Web of Science.Olensky, M., Schmidt, M., & Eck, J. N. (2015).Evaluation of the citation matching algorithms of CWTS and iFQ in comparison to Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2550-2564. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23590 |
Transforming the Heterogeneity of Subject Categories into a Stability Interval of the MNCS.Schmidt, M., & Sirtes, D. (2015).Transforming the Heterogeneity of Subject Categories into a Stability Interval of the MNCS. In A. Salah et al. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference (ISSI 2015), Istanbul, Turkey, 29 June to 3 July, 2015, (S. 365-371). Istanbul: Bogaziçi University Printhouse. |
Liste der Vorträge & Tagungen
seit 01/2016
Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Deutschen Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung, Abteilung 2 Forschungssystem und Wissenschaftsdynamik
seit 02/2014
Promotion zum Thema "Retracted Publications and their Effects on Authors and Scientific Communities"
06/2011 - 12/2015
Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Institut für Forschungsinformation und Qualitätssicherung: iFQ
02/2007 - 05/2011
Bibliotheksleiterin am Max-Planck-Institut für Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaften, Leipzig
03/2001 - 10/2006
Magister Artium in den Fächern Bibliothekswissenschaft und der Neueren Deutschen Literatur an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin und der Freien Universität Berlin
03/1996 - 06/1999
Studium der Sozialpädagogik an der Fachhochschule Bielefeld, mit Abschluss als Diplom-Sozialpädagogin, staatliche Anerkennung 11/2000
