Marion Schmidt

Marion Schmidt

Abteilung Forschungssystem und Wissenschaftsdynamik
wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin
  • 030 2064177-32
  • 030 2064177-99

Wissenschaftliche Forschungsgebiete

Bibliometrie, Wissenschaftsforschung, Evaluation von Forschungspolitik und Institutionen

Projekte

Liste der Projekte

Leider konnte für diese Suchkombination kein Ergebnis gefunden werden
Bibliometrisches Monitoring für das DZNE
Kompetenzzentrum Bibliometrie
Publikationen

Liste der Publikationen

Leider konnte für diese Suchkombination kein Ergebnis gefunden werden

Does Wikipedia Cover the Relevant Literature on Major Innovations Timely? An Exploratory Case Study of CRISPR/Cas9.

Schmidt, M., Kircheis, W., Simons, A., Potthast, M., & Stein, B. (2021).
Does Wikipedia Cover the Relevant Literature on Major Innovations Timely? An Exploratory Case Study of CRISPR/Cas9. In W. Glänzel, S. Heeffer, P.-S. Chi, & R. Rousseau (Hrsg.), 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics - Proceedings (S. 1021-1026). Leuven: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (I.S.S.I.).

A Case Study of the Epistemic Function of Citations - Implications for Citation-based Science Mapping.

Seitz, C., Schmidt, M., Schwichtenberg, N., & Velden, T. (2021).
A Case Study of the Epistemic Function of Citations - Implications for Citation-based Science Mapping. In W. Glänzel, S. Heeffer, P.-S. Chi, & R. Rousseau (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (S. 1027-1032). Leuven: KU Leuven / International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (I.S.S.I.).
Abstract

The use of citations as indicators of topical relatedness of publications is common in the algorithmic mapping of the structure of science. References to source documents, however, may serve a variety of epistemic functions, and hence represent rather different dimensions of topical relatedness, such as the research methods used, the empirical objects studied, the theoretical resources build on, the research questions pursued, or the external motivation for and relevance of the work. In this case study, we explore the diversity in topical dimensions along which publications are linked in citation networks, by coding the epistemic function of in-text citations. [...]

Measurement variation in bibliometric impact indicators.

Stahlschmidt, S., & Schmidt, M. (2019).
Measurement variation in bibliometric impact indicators. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 1500-1506). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

An Analysis of the Validity of Retraction Annotation in Pubmed and the Web of Science.

Schmidt, M. (2018).
An Analysis of the Validity of Retraction Annotation in Pubmed and the Web of Science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 69(2), 318-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23913

The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted publications.

Hesselmann, F., Graf, V., Schmidt, M., & Reinhart, M. (2017).
The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted publications. Current Sociology, Volume: 65 issue: 6, 814-845.

Assessing the effects of the German Excellence Initiative with bibliometric methods.

Möller, T., Schmidt, M., & Hornbostel, S. (2016).
Assessing the effects of the German Excellence Initiative with bibliometric methods. Scientometrics 109(3), 2217-2239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2090-3

Assessing the effects of the German Excellence Initiative with Bibliometric Means based on two Data Sources.

Möller, T., & Schmidt, M. (2015).
Assessing the effects of the German Excellence Initiative with Bibliometric Means based on two Data Sources. In Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2015). Lugano.

Publikationsanalyse im Web of Science und Scopus.

Aman, V., Hinze, S., & Schmidt, M. (2015).
Publikationsanalyse im Web of Science und Scopus. In A. Botte, U. Sondergeld & M. Rittberger (Hrsg.), Monitoring Bildungsforschung. Befunde aus dem Forschungsprojekt "Entwicklung und Veränderungsdynamik eines heterogenen sozialwissenschaftlichen Feldes am Beispiel der Bildungsforschung", (S. 107-174). Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.

Evaluation of the citation matching algorithms of CWTS and iFQ in comparison to Web of Science.

Olensky, M., Schmidt, M., & Eck, J. N. (2015).
Evaluation of the citation matching algorithms of CWTS and iFQ in comparison to Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2550-2564. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23590

Transforming the Heterogeneity of Subject Categories into a Stability Interval of the MNCS.

Schmidt, M., & Sirtes, D. (2015).
Transforming the Heterogeneity of Subject Categories into a Stability Interval of the MNCS. In A. Salah et al. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference (ISSI 2015), Istanbul, Turkey, 29 June to 3 July, 2015, (S. 365-371). Istanbul: Bogaziçi University Printhouse.

The Best Five - Do Authors' Assessments of their own Publications Correspond to Metric Based Rankings?

Schmidt, M., & Neufeld, J. (2013).
The Best Five - Do Authors' Assessments of their own Publications Correspond to Metric Based Rankings? In Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, (S. 335-342). Berlin: iFQ.

Development and Evaluation of a Match Key for Linking References to Cited Articles.

Schmidt, M. (2012).
Development and Evaluation of a Match Key for Linking References to Cited Articles. In É. Archambault, Y. Gingras & V. Larivière (Hrsg.), Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, (S. 707-718). Montréal: Science-Metrix and OST.

Entropie eines Forschungsgebietes. Theoretische Erarbeitung und Durchführung einer Kozitations-Clusteranalyse im Projekt "Testing the Homogenisation Thesis - Measuring the Diversity of Research" (Magisterarbeit). Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

Schmidt, M. (2006).
Entropie eines Forschungsgebietes. Theoretische Erarbeitung und Durchführung einer Kozitations-Clusteranalyse im Projekt "Testing the Homogenisation Thesis - Measuring the Diversity of Research" (Magisterarbeit). Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

A Methodological Study for Measuring the Diversity of Science.

Schmidt, M., Gläser, J., Havemann, F., & Heinz, M. (2006).
A Methodological Study for Measuring the Diversity of Science. Proceedings of International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Seventh COLLNET Meeting (S. 129-137). Nancy: SRDI - INIST-CNRS.
Vorträge & Tagungen

Liste der Vorträge & Tagungen

Leider konnte für diese Suchkombination kein Ergebnis gefunden werden

Bibliometrische Messvariabilität im Kontext von Rankings.

Stahlschmidt, S., & Schmidt, M. (2021, September/Oktober).
Bibliometrische Messvariabilität im Kontext von Rankings. Vortrag auf dem Workshop Netzwerkveranstaltung 2021 des HRK-Serviceprojekts Internationale Hochschulrankings, Hochschulrektorenkonferenz und Freie Universität Berlin.

When Social Networks Write Science History Priority Disputes on Wikipedia.

Simons, A. (2021, September).
When Social Networks Write Science History Priority Disputes on Wikipedia. Vortrag auf dem Workshop Framing Innovation in a Networked World: An Interdisciplinary Workshop , Rossini, Paolo, Erasmus School of Philosophy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Does Wikipedia Cover the Relevant Literature on Major Innovations Timely? An Exploratory Case Study of CRISPR/Cas9.

Schmidt, M., Kircheis, W., Simons, A., Potthast, M., & Stein, B. (2021, Juli).
Does Wikipedia Cover the Relevant Literature on Major Innovations Timely? An Exploratory Case Study of CRISPR/Cas9. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 18th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2021), International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract

We analyze Wikipedia’s representation of the Nobel Prize winning CRISPR/Cas9 technology to explore to what extent and with what temporal dynamics Wikipedia cites well-acknowledged or highly cited literature. We use several matching heuristics to match publications from two publication corpora with the central Wikipedia CRISPR article. A combination of verbatim searches by title, DOI, and PMID is sufficient. The Wikipedia article references a substantial amount of articles that are part of our corpora, as well as literature that is not scientific. Delays in coverage show a dependence on the dynamics of both the field and the Wikipedia article itself

Measurement variation in bibliometric impact indicators.

Stahlschmidt, S., & Schmidt, M. (2019, September).
Measurement variation in bibliometric impact indicators. Vortrag auf der 17th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI2019), 02.-05.09.2019, Rom, Italien.

The impact of published incorrect scientific information on the knowledge production of scientific communities.

Gläser, J., Kienemund, T., Liesegang, L., & Schmidt, M. (2019, Juni).
The impact of published incorrect scientific information on the knowledge production of scientific communities. Vortrag auf der 6th World Conference on Research Integrity 2019, Hong Kong, 02.-05.06.2019.

How does the diffusion of incorrect information affect the production of scientific knowledge?

Gläser C., Kienemund T., Liesegang L., & Schmidt M. (2018, November).
How does the diffusion of incorrect information affect the production of scientific knowledge? Poster-Präsentation auf dem International Workshop „Independence of Research”, Technische Universität Berlin, 15.-16. November 2018, Berlin.

Measurement variation in bibliometric impact indicators.

Stahlschmidt, S., & Schmidt, M. (2018, Juli/August).
Measurement variation in bibliometric impact indicators. Vortrag auf dem Joint Statistical Meeting 2018 (JSM2018), 28.07.2018 - 02.08.2018, Vancouver, Kanada.

A Citation Context Analysis of Retracted Publications.

Schmidt, M. (2018, Februar).
A Citation Context Analysis of Retracted Publications. Vortrag auf der Printeger European Conference on Research Integrity Conference, 05.-06.02.2018, Universität Bonn.

Measuring and Analyzing the Internal, Topical Coherence of Web of Science Categories.

Stahlschmidt, S., & Schmidt, M. (2017, Oktober).
Measuring and Analyzing the Internal, Topical Coherence of Web of Science Categories. Vortrag auf der 16th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI), 16.-20.10.2017, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

An in-depth analysis of the annotation of retractions in PubMed and Web of Science.

Schmidt, M. (2017, Mai).
An in-depth analysis of the annotation of retractions in PubMed and Web of Science. Vortrag auf der 5th World Conference on Research Integrity, 28.-31.05.2017, Amsterdam, Niederlande.

Accounting for the Heterogeneity of Subject Categories in the Evaluation of Universities.

Sirtes, D., & Schmidt, M. (2015, September).
Accounting for the Heterogeneity of Subject Categories in the Evaluation of Universities. Vortrag auf der Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy (ATLC 2015), Atlanta.

Assessing the Effects of the German Excellence Initiative with Bibliometric Means based on two Data Sources.

Möller, T., & Schmidt, M. (2015, September).
Assessing the Effects of the German Excellence Initiative with Bibliometric Means based on two Data Sources. Vortrag auf der 20th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2015), Lugano.

Transforming the Heterogeneity of Subject Categories into a Stability Interval of the MNCS.

Schmidt, M., & Sirtes, D. (2015, Juni/Juli).
Transforming the Heterogeneity of Subject Categories into a Stability Interval of the MNCS. Vortrag auf der 15th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI), Istanbul.

Wie konsistent ist die Kennzeichnung zurückgezogener Publikationen in Datenbanken?

Schmidt, M. (2014, September).
Wie konsistent ist die Kennzeichnung zurückgezogener Publikationen in Datenbanken? Bibliometrie2014, Regensburg.

Zur Materialität wissenschaftlichen Fehlverhaltens - Herstellung von Transparenz durch zurückgezogene Publikationen.

Reinhart, M., & Schmidt, M. (2014, Juni).
Zur Materialität wissenschaftlichen Fehlverhaltens - Herstellung von Transparenz durch zurückgezogene Publikationen. Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung, Dortmund.
CV
seit 01/2016

Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Deutschen Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung, Abteilung 2 Forschungssystem und Wissenschaftsdynamik

seit 02/2014

Promotion zum Thema "Retracted Publications and their Effects on Authors and Scientific Communities"

06/2011 - 12/2015

Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Institut für Forschungsinformation und Qualitätssicherung: iFQ

02/2007 - 05/2011

Bibliotheksleiterin am Max-Planck-Institut für Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaften, Leipzig

03/2001 - 10/2006

Magister Artium in den Fächern Bibliothekswissenschaft und der Neueren Deutschen Literatur an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin und der Freien Universität Berlin

03/1996 - 06/1999

Studium der Sozialpädagogik an der Fachhochschule Bielefeld, mit Abschluss als Diplom-Sozialpädagogin, staatliche Anerkennung 11/2000

Mehr erfahren Weniger anzeigen