Gotta catch 'Em All... Or Not?: How LLMs bypass traditional checks & mimic human response behavior in web surveys. Shahania, S., Spiliopoulou, M., & Broneske, D. (2025). Gotta catch 'Em All... Or Not?: How LLMs bypass traditional checks & mimic human response behavior in web surveys. In Association for Computing Machinery (Hrsg.), CI '25: Proceedings of the ACM Collective Intelligence Conference (S. 113-128). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3715928.3737491
|
Bibliodiversity of small academic publishers: The role of open access for impact and visibility. Cruz Romero, R., Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2025). Bibliodiversity of small academic publishers: The role of open access for impact and visibility. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science (CJILS/RCSIB), 48(1), 146-166.
|
Does citation context information enhance the validity of citation analysis for measuring research quality? An empirical comparison of peer assessments and enriched citations. Donner, P., Stahlschmidt, S., Haunschild, R., & Bornmann, L. (2025). Does citation context information enhance the validity of citation analysis for measuring research quality? An empirical comparison of peer assessments and enriched citations. Quantitative Science Studies (online first).
Abstract
Since citation context information has entered the Web of Science (Clarivate) in recent years, one wonders whether the legitimacy and soundness of citation analyses for measuring research quality of publications can be improved by considering this information. The legitimacy and soundness of citation analysis can be established by assessing their construct validity. This can be done by studying how citation impact variables relate to generally accepted external validation data, like human expert assessments of research quality.[...]
|
Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: A scoping review. Ng, J. Y., Liu, H., Masood, M., Syed, N., Stephen, D., ... & Moher, D. (2025). Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: A scoping review. Quantitative Science Studies, 2025 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss.a.12
|
Paukenschlag in der #IchBinHanna-Debatte. Eisentraut, N. (11. Juli 2025). Paukenschlag in der #IchBinHanna-Debatte [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://www.juwiss.de/62-2025/
Abstract
Das BVerfG erklärt die Regelung des Berliner Hochschulgesetzes, die die verpflichtende Entfristung von Postdoktorand*innen vorsah, für formell verfassungswidrig. Die von der HU Berlin bemühte Verfassungsbeschwerde war erfolgreich. Das landespolitische Projekt einer Transformation wissenschaftlicher Qualifikationsstellen hin zu einem flächendeckenden Angebot entfristeter Stellen für Postdocs war bereits politisch tot, nun hat das BVerfG die Regelung verfassungsrechtlich beerdigt. Die Entscheidung hinterlässt den schalen Nachgeschmack, dass damit einem „Weiter-so“ der Qualifikations-Befristung von Postdoktorand*innen der Weg bereitet wurde.
|
SBC-SHAP: Increasing the accessibility and interpretability of machine learning algorithms for sepsis prediction. Walke, D., Steinbach, D., Kaiser, T., Schönhuth, A., Saake, G., Broneske, D., & Heyer, R. (2025). SBC-SHAP: Increasing the accessibility and interpretability of machine learning algorithms for sepsis prediction. The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf091
|
Alphabetical author order and co-author contributions in mathematics. Donner, P., & Korytkowski, P. (2025). Alphabetical author order and co-author contributions in mathematics. Scientometrics (online first).
Abstract
In this study we investigate the relative contributions of co-authors to publications in mathematics. Mathematics is an interesting case for such research because it is one of only a few scientific disciplines in which alphabetical order of names of co-authors on publications is still the prevailing convention rather than contribution-based order. The study is based on unique data of publicly available author-provided quantitative contribution statements for co-authored papers from applications for habilitation degrees in Poland. [...]
|
As open as possible, but as closed as necessary: Openness in innovation policy. Cruz Romero, R. (2025). As open as possible, but as closed as necessary: Openness in innovation policy. Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, 40(3), 166-181. https://doi.org/10.13169/Prometheus.40.3.0004
|
Small open access publishers: An analysis of visibility and impact patterns. Cruz Romero, R. (2025). Small open access publishers: An analysis of visibility and impact patterns. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 2342-2350). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI).
|
Structural and institutional determinants of Open Access publishing: A macro-perspective. Cruz Romero, R., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2025). Structural and institutional determinants of Open Access publishing: A macro-perspective. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 2351-2360). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI).
|
Projekt DiTraP: Disziplinenspezifische Wissenstransferpraktiken. Janßen, M., & Just, A. (2025). Projekt DiTraP: Disziplinenspezifische Wissenstransferpraktiken. In A. Eickelmann, J. Henke, B. Krieger, U. Schmoch, J. Spanjol, & F. Witzigmann (Hrsg.), Erfolgreiche Gestaltung von Wissenstransfer an Hochschulen. Ein Leitfaden für Hochschulleitungen und Wissenschaftsministerien (S. 13-20). Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
|
Egocentric attribution bias in formal co-author contribution statements and bibliometric counting method validity. Donner, P. (2025). Egocentric attribution bias in formal co-author contribution statements and bibliometric counting method validity. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
|
Are citation context information stronger related to peer ratings than citation counts? A descriptive analysis. Donner, P., Stahlschmidt, S., Haunschild, R., & Bornmann, L. (2025). Are citation context information stronger related to peer ratings than citation counts? A descriptive analysis. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 325-332). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
Abstract
In this study, we investigated whether citation context information is able to increase the validity of citation impact analyses to measure research quality compared to simple citation counts. We analyzed the statistical relationships of information extracted from structured citation context data in the Web of Science (Clarivate) such as the placement of citations within specific sections of an article with post-publication peer review quality ratings from Faculty Opinions (H1 connect), used as an external validity criterion for research quality. The study is based on publications in medicine and life sciences. [...]
|
Digitalisierung der Juristischen Ausbildung. Eisentraut, N. (2025). Digitalisierung der Juristischen Ausbildung. In J. Eichelberger & R. Schwarze (Hrsg.), Festschrift 50 Jahre Juristische Fakultät der Leibniz Universität Hannover. Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748949893-531
Abstract
Als die Juristische Fakultät der Leibniz Universität Hannover 1973/1974 gegründet wurde, steckte das Internet noch in seinen Kinderschuhen. Die digitale Revolution begann langsam Fahrt aufzunehmen und erste Lehrstühle für Rechtsinformatik nahmen ihre Arbeit auf. 50 Jahre später ist die Digitalisierung in der Breite der Hochschulen angekommen: Lehren und Studieren findet vernetzt über und unterstützt durch digitale Endgeräte und die Möglichkeiten des Internets statt; eine neuerliche digitale Revolution durch die disruptiven Technologien künstlicher Intelligenz kündigt sich an. Der Artikel versichert sich des Status quo der Digitalisierung der juristischen Ausbildung und zeigt künftige Entwicklungspotentiale auf.
|
Assessment of a Research Funding Organization for International Mobility by Bibliometric Means. Implementation, Results and Challenges of Responsible Research Evaluation. Möller, T., & Dittmann, P. (2025). Assessment of a Research Funding Organization for International Mobility by Bibliometric Means. Implementation, Results and Challenges of Responsible Research Evaluation. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 333-349). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
|
