Artikel

Leider konnte für diese Suchkombination kein Ergebnis gefunden werden

Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100).

Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., & Wang, J. (2013).
Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100). Journal of Informetrics, 7/4, 933-944.

Jugend und Studium.

Kerst, C., & Wolter, A. (2013).
Jugend und Studium. In Y. Kaiser, M. Spenn, M. Freitag, T. Rauschenbach & M. Corsa (Hrsg.), Handbuch Jugend. Evangelische Perspektiven (S. 207-212). Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich.

Bibliometric Evaluation Standards Debate.

Sirtes, D., & Waltman, L. (2013).
Bibliometric Evaluation Standards Debate. In Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, (S. 373-377). Berlin: iFQ.

The characteristics of highly cited non-source items in political science.

Chi, P.-S. (2013).
The characteristics of highly cited non-source items in political science. In S. Hinze & A. Lottmann (Hrsg.), Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Berlin: iFQ.

Collaboration Benefits and International Visibility of Two-Country-Collaborations.

Riechert, M., Sirtes, D., & Lietz, H. (2013).
Collaboration Benefits and International Visibility of Two-Country-Collaborations. In S. Hinze & A. Lottmann (Hrsg.), Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, (S. 303-312). Berlin: iFQ.

The Best Five - Do Authors' Assessments of their own Publications Correspond to Metric Based Rankings?

Schmidt, M., & Neufeld, J. (2013).
The Best Five - Do Authors' Assessments of their own Publications Correspond to Metric Based Rankings? In Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, (S. 335-342). Berlin: iFQ.

Bildung.

Seeber, S., Wolter, A., Döbert, H., Kerst, C., Becker-Stoll, F., & Seitz, C. (2013).
Bildung. In J. Rump & N. Walter (Hrsg.), Arbeitswelt 2030. Trends, Prognosen, Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten, (S. 93-122). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

Peer review-based selection decisions in individual research funding, applicants publication strategies and performance: The case of the ERC Starting Grants.

Neufeld, J., Huber, N., & Wegner, A. (2013).
Peer review-based selection decisions in individual research funding, applicants publication strategies and performance: The case of the ERC Starting Grants. Research Evaluation, Vol. 22, No. 3, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt014

Wirtschaftliche und soziale Situation der Studierenden heute.

Leszczensky, M. (2013).
Wirtschaftliche und soziale Situation der Studierenden heute. In H.-U. Erichsen, J. Zöllner, B. Schäfer & H. Staschen (Hrsg.), Lebensraum Hochschule - Grundfragen einer sozial definierten Bildungspolitik (S. 359-382). Siegburg: Reckinger.

HIS:Magazin 3|2013.

HIS (Hrsg.) - mit Beiträgen von Körner, W., Schneider, H., Scheller, P., Woisch, A., Vogel, B., Ortenburger, A., ... & Benthien, J. (2013).
HIS:Magazin 3|2013. Hannover: HIS.

The New York Times as a Resource for Mode 2.

Hicks, D., & Wang, J. (2013).
The New York Times as a Resource for Mode 2. Science, Technology & Human Values, 851-877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162243913497806

Funding Acknowledgements for the German Research Foundation (DFG). The Dirty Data of the Web of Science Database and How to Clean It Up.

Sirtes, D. (2013).
Funding Acknowledgements for the German Research Foundation (DFG). The Dirty Data of the Web of Science Database and How to Clean It Up. In J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel, C. Gumpenberger, M. Hörlesberger & H. Moed (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, (S. 784-795). Vienna: AIT GmbH.

Immer noch eine Ausnahme - nicht-traditionelle Studierende an deutschen Hochschulen.

Dahm, G., & Kerst, C. (2013).
Immer noch eine Ausnahme - nicht-traditionelle Studierende an deutschen Hochschulen. Zeitschrift für Beratung und Studium (ZBS), 8(2), 34-39.

Science Dynamics: Normalized Growth Curves, Sharpe Ratios, and Scaling Exponents.

Lietz, H., & Riechert, M. (2013).
Science Dynamics: Normalized Growth Curves, Sharpe Ratios, and Scaling Exponents. In Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - the 14th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vienna, Austria, July 15-18, 2013, (S. 1566-1577).

Umverteilung durch öffentliche Realtransfers in der Hochschulbildung?

Gwosć, C., van der Beek, G. (2013).
Umverteilung durch öffentliche Realtransfers in der Hochschulbildung? Wirtschaftsdienst: Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, 93. Jahrgang, Heft 7, 476-483.

Kontakt

Anja Gottburgsen
Dr. Anja Gottburgsen 0511 450670-912