What it takes to do science diplomacy. Practices, identities, needs and challenges of science diplomacy practitioners. Baseline analysis and needs assessment.
Degelsegger-Márquez, A., Flink, T., & Rungius, C. (2019).
What it takes to do science diplomacy. Practices, identities, needs and challenges of science diplomacy practitioners. Baseline analysis and needs assessment.
Deliverable 2.3, Vienna: S4D4C.
|
ETL Best Practices for Data Quality Checks in RIS Databases.
Azeroual, O., Saake, G. & Abuosba, M. (2019).
ETL Best Practices for Data Quality Checks in RIS Databases.
Informatics, volume 6, 1-13.
|
The governance and standardization of research information in different science systems: a comparative analysis of Germany and Italy.
Biesenbender, S. (2019).
The governance and standardization of research information in different science systems: a comparative analysis of Germany and Italy.
Higher Education Quarterly, 73(1), 116-127.
|
Support structures to facilitate the dissemination and implementation of a national standard for research information – the German case of the Research Core Dataset.
Biesenbender, S., & Herwig, S. (2019).
Support structures to facilitate the dissemination and implementation of a national standard for research information – the German case of the Research Core Dataset.
Procedia Computer Science, 146, 131-141.
|
Using Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) to showcase national and institutional research (potential): research information systems in the context of Open Science.
Biesenbender, S., Petersohn, S., & Thiedig, C. (2019).
Using Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) to showcase national and institutional research (potential): research information systems in the context of Open Science.
Procedia Computer Science, 146, 142-155.
|
Bezahlt oder unbezahlt? Überstunden im akademischen Mittelbau.
Ambrasat, J. (2019).
Bezahlt oder unbezahlt? Überstunden im akademischen Mittelbau.
Forschung und Lehre, 2/2019.
|
Eine post-positivistische Betrachtung der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung.
Rungius, C., & Weller, C. (2019).
Eine post-positivistische Betrachtung der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung.
In M. Barbehön et al. (Hrsg.), Was bedeutet Interpretieren? Interpretative Verfahren der Politikforschung, Sonderband der Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer.
|
Was gewinnen wir durch Open Science und Open Innovation?
Blümel, C.; Fecher, B.; & Leimüller, G. (2019).
Was gewinnen wir durch Open Science und Open Innovation?
Essen: Stifterverband.
|
Making sense of social interaction: Emotional coherence drives semantic integration as assessed by event-related potentials.
Schauenburg, G., Conrad, M., von Scheve, Chr., Barber, H., Ambrasat, J., Aryani, A., & Schröder, T. (2019).
Making sense of social interaction: Emotional coherence drives semantic integration as assessed by event-related potentials.
Neuropsychologia. (online first).
|
A Conceptual Framework: An internal working paper defining the conceptual framework for the case studies.
Rungius, C. (2018).
A Conceptual Framework: An internal working paper defining the conceptual framework for the case studies.
Deliverable 2.5, Berlin/Innsbruck/Vienna: S4D4C.
|
Der Kerndatensatz Forschung: Aufbau, Anwendung und die Rolle der Bibliothek.
Thiedig, C. (2018).
Der Kerndatensatz Forschung: Aufbau, Anwendung und die Rolle der Bibliothek.
GMS Medizin — Bibliothek — Information, 18(3) 2018.
|
Elicitive Ansätze in der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung.
Rungius, C. (2018).
Elicitive Ansätze in der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung.
Bonn: lehrgut.hypotheses.org.
|
Does the Winner Take it All? Increasing Inequality in Scientific Authorship.
Rauhut, H., Winter, F., & Johann, D. (2018).
Does the Winner Take it All? Increasing Inequality in Scientific Authorship.
In M. C. Buchmann & R. A. Scott (Hrsg.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Hoboken: Wiley Online.
|
The Perception of Scientific Authorship Across Domains.
Johann, D., & Mayer, S. J. (2018).
The Perception of Scientific Authorship Across Domains.
Minvera.
|
Text data mining and data quality management for research information systems in the context of open data and open science.
Azeroual, O., Saake, G., Abuosba, M., & Schöpfel, J. (2018).
Text data mining and data quality management for research information systems in the context of open data and open science.
In ESI-CNRST, N. Ibnlkhayat (Hrsg.), Proceedings of 3rd International Colloquium on Open Access - Open Access to Science Foundations, Issues and Dynamics (29-46), 28-30 November 2018, Rabat-Morocco, 11/2018.
ISBN 978-9920-36-568-0
|
