Gotta catch 'Em All... Or Not?: How LLMs bypass traditional checks & mimic human response behavior in web surveys. Shahania, S., Spiliopoulou, M., & Broneske, D. (2025). Gotta catch 'Em All... Or Not?: How LLMs bypass traditional checks & mimic human response behavior in web surveys. In Association for Computing Machinery (Hrsg.), CI '25: Proceedings of the ACM Collective Intelligence Conference (S. 113-128). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3715928.3737491
|
Neue berufliche Rollen? Kompetenz- und Aufgabenprofile in der IT-gestützten Forschungsberichterstattung. Thiedig, C., Schelske, S., Petersohn, S., & Euler, T. (2025). Neue berufliche Rollen? Kompetenz- und Aufgabenprofile in der IT-gestützten Forschungsberichterstattung. Daten- und Methodenbericht zur quantitativen Erhebung des BMBF-geförderten Projektes BERTI. Hannover: DZHW.
|
Von der Uni in den Job: Adäquanz der Beschäftigung von Hochschulabsolvent*innen. Huß, B., Carstensen, J., Mentges, H., & Albrecht, T. (2025). Von der Uni in den Job: Adäquanz der Beschäftigung von Hochschulabsolvent*innen. (DZHW Brief 03|2025). Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.34878/2025.03.dzhw_brief
Abstract
Der DZHW-Brief 03/25 thematisiert die Adäquanz der Beschäftigung von Hochschulabsolvent*innen des Prüfungsjahrgangs 2021. Zum Befragungszeitpunkt (ca. 1,5 bis 2,5 Jahre nach dem Abschluss) sieht sich die große Mehrheit der Absolvent*innen als adäquat beschäftigt. Die im Studium erworbenen Zertifikate können demnach mehrheitlich auf dem Arbeitsmarkt verwertet werden und das Niveau sowie die Aufgaben der Beschäftigungen sind den Studienabschlüssen entsprechend angemessen. Unterschiede zeigen sich hinsichtlich des Geschlechts, da Frauen mit einem Bachelorabschluss häufiger überqualifiziert beschäftigt sind als Männer mit einem Bachelorabschluss.
|
Bibliodiversity of small academic publishers: The role of open access for impact and visibility. Cruz Romero, R., Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2025). Bibliodiversity of small academic publishers: The role of open access for impact and visibility. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science (CJILS/RCSIB), 48(1), 146-166.
|
Does citation context information enhance the validity of citation analysis for measuring research quality? An empirical comparison of peer assessments and enriched citations. Donner, P., Stahlschmidt, S., Haunschild, R., & Bornmann, L. (2025). Does citation context information enhance the validity of citation analysis for measuring research quality? An empirical comparison of peer assessments and enriched citations. Quantitative Science Studies (online first).
Abstract
Since citation context information has entered the Web of Science (Clarivate) in recent years, one wonders whether the legitimacy and soundness of citation analyses for measuring research quality of publications can be improved by considering this information. The legitimacy and soundness of citation analysis can be established by assessing their construct validity. This can be done by studying how citation impact variables relate to generally accepted external validation data, like human expert assessments of research quality.[...]
|
Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: A scoping review. Ng, J. Y., Liu, H., Masood, M., Syed, N., Stephen, D., ... & Moher, D. (2025). Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: A scoping review. Quantitative Science Studies, 2025 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss.a.12
|
Paukenschlag in der #IchBinHanna-Debatte. Eisentraut, N. (11. Juli 2025). Paukenschlag in der #IchBinHanna-Debatte [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://www.juwiss.de/62-2025/
|
SBC-SHAP: Increasing the accessibility and interpretability of machine learning algorithms for sepsis prediction. Walke, D., Steinbach, D., Kaiser, T., Schönhuth, A., Saake, G., Broneske, D., & Heyer, R. (2025). SBC-SHAP: Increasing the accessibility and interpretability of machine learning algorithms for sepsis prediction. The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf091
|
Artificial intelligence (AI) in student life: students' assessments of the use of AI at German universities. Marczuk, A., Multrus, F., Hinz, T., & Strauß, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) in student life: students' assessments of the use of AI at German universities. (DZHW Brief 02a|2025). Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.34878/2025.02.a_dzhw_brief
Abstract
The majority of students in the winter semester 2024/2025 use AI in their studies and are relatively familiar with how it works. ChatGPT is the most frequently used AI tool and its use has increased significantly since 2023.
|
Alphabetical author order and co-author contributions in mathematics. Donner, P., & Korytkowski, P. (2025). Alphabetical author order and co-author contributions in mathematics. Scientometrics (online first).
Abstract
In this study we investigate the relative contributions of co-authors to publications in mathematics. Mathematics is an interesting case for such research because it is one of only a few scientific disciplines in which alphabetical order of names of co-authors on publications is still the prevailing convention rather than contribution-based order. The study is based on unique data of publicly available author-provided quantitative contribution statements for co-authored papers from applications for habilitation degrees in Poland. [...]
|
As open as possible, but as closed as necessary: Openness in innovation policy. Cruz Romero, R. (2025). As open as possible, but as closed as necessary: Openness in innovation policy. Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, 40(3), 166-181. https://doi.org/10.13169/Prometheus.40.3.0004
|
Informationsveranstaltung zum KDSF-Standard für die FIS-Projektgruppe Forschungsinformationssystem Thüringer Hochschulen. Geschäftsstelle der KFiD (2025). Workshop Informationsveranstaltung zum KDSF-Standard für die FIS-Projektgruppe Forschungsinformationssystem Thüringer Hochschulen, Berlin.
|
Open Research Tools: Stand und Herausforderungen im Spannungsfeld von Forschungssoftware, Offenheit und digitaler Infrastruktur. Streicher, J., Schütz, M., Blümel, C., & Schniedermann, A. (2025). Open Research Tools: Stand und Herausforderungen im Spannungsfeld von Forschungssoftware, Offenheit und digitaler Infrastruktur. Graz, Wien, Klagenfurt: Joanneum Research.
Abstract
Digital tools, software and related infrastructures are central to modern science and research. With regards to open science, open software tools are becoming increasingly important as they promote and support collaboration, reproducibility and access to resources. Researchers are actively contributing to the development of these “Open Research Tools (ORT)” and are thus helping to shape the digital transformation of the science system. This change is also noticeable in Germany, where the area of research software is gaining increasing importance. The aim of the study is...
Download
|
Small open access publishers: An analysis of visibility and impact patterns. Cruz Romero, R. (2025). Small open access publishers: An analysis of visibility and impact patterns. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 2342-2350). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI).
|
Structural and institutional determinants of Open Access publishing: A macro-perspective. Cruz Romero, R., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2025). Structural and institutional determinants of Open Access publishing: A macro-perspective. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 2351-2360). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI).
|
