Articles

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Clelland, H. T., Kovacs, M., Holzmeister, F., ... & Nosek, B. A. (2026).
Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences. Nature, 2026(652), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09844-9

By linking national scholarly infrastructures we can better understand the impact of global research.

Donner, P., Stahlschmidt, S., Nazarovets, S., Cojocaru, I., Razmadze, M., & Sargsyan, S. (1. April 2026).
By linking national scholarly infrastructures we can better understand the impact of global research [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/04/01/by-linking-national-scholarly-infrastructures-we-can-better-understand-the-impact-of-global-research/
Abstract

Global scholarly information systems provide poor coverage for social science and humanities research taking place outside of the anglophone world and in languages other than English. Paul Donner, Stephan Stahschmidt, Serhii Nazarovets, Igor Cojocaru, Irina Cojocaru, Marina Razmadze and Shushanik Sargsyan highlight a range of national initiatives taking place aimed at improving scholarly data for local and national research and argue for the value of their greater integration.

Open, but uncounted: Citations to Open Access preprints and Working Papers of published papers.

Donner, P. (2026).
Open, but uncounted: Citations to Open Access preprints and Working Papers of published papers. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 24(1) (online first).
Abstract

The citations to open access preprint and working paper versions of papers that are also formally published in journals are not regularly counted in global multidisciplinary proprietary citation index databases, nor are they considered in most bibliometric studies. They are, however, integrated into paper citation counts in other citation databases. It can be argued that open access preprint citations reflect a relevant part of scientific impact of a work as proxied by citation counts, particularly in scientific disciplines that make extensive use of preprints/working papers for rapid open communication. Here we present a large-scale study of these usually uncounted open access preprint citations for the Web of Science database [...]

Publishing fine-grained standardized metadata – Lessons learned from three research data centers.

Wenzig, K., Daniel, A., Hansen, D., Koberg, T., & Tudose, M. (2026).
Publishing fine-grained standardized metadata – Lessons learned from three research data centers. Data Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-013

Transcribing and coding voice answers obtained in web surveys: Comparing three leading automatic speech recognition tools.

Revilla, M., Ochoa, C., Höhne, J. K., & Couper, M. P. (2026).
Transcribing and coding voice answers obtained in web surveys: Comparing three leading automatic speech recognition tools. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smaf028

The state of virtual internationalisation at higher education institutions in Germany.

Vögtle, E. M., & Marinoni, G. (2026).
The state of virtual internationalisation at higher education institutions in Germany. (Wissenschaft Weltoffen2025). Bielefeld: wbv. https://doi.org/10.3278/9783763979554
Abstract

This short summarising article highlights some key findings of a study on the impact of digitalisation on the internationalisation policies and practices of German higher education institutions (HEIs). It examines the evolving landscape of virtual internationalisation (VI) within HEIs, drawing on findings from the INDISTRA project and the 6th Global Survey of the International University Association (IAU). Prompted by accelerated digitalisation due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the study investigates strategies, drivers, priorities, and challenges associated with VI.

Mobility and career plans of international doctoral students in Germany.

Schiffer-Fiedler, I., & Muschik, M. L. (2026).
Mobility and career plans of international doctoral students in Germany. In N. Netz, J. Kercher, N. Knüttgen, & I. Fuge (Hrsg.), Wissenschaft weltoffen 2025. Facts and Figures on the Internationalisation of Studies and Research in Germany and Worldwide (S. 76-79). Bielefeld: wbv. https://doi.org/10.3278/7004002xew002

Mehr Evidenz statt Einbildung zu Künstlicher Intelligenz in Hochschule und Wissenschaft. Zehn Thesen zu künftigen Beiträgen der Hochschulforschung.

Steinhardt, I., Henke, J., Watanabe, A., Wieczorek, O., Biere, L., ... & Schneijderberg, C. (2026).
Mehr Evidenz statt Einbildung zu Künstlicher Intelligenz in Hochschule und Wissenschaft. Zehn Thesen zu künftigen Beiträgen der Hochschulforschung. die hochschule, 2026(1-2).

Berufsbegleitend Studieren.

Ordemann, J. (2026).
Berufsbegleitend Studieren. der gemeinderat, 26(02), 42-44.

Introduction to the special issue “The datafication of communication – New methodological approaches and challenges”.

Niemann-Lenz, J., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., Domahidi, E., & Mahrt, M. (2026).
Introduction to the special issue “The datafication of communication – New methodological approaches and challenges”. Medien- & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 74(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2026-1-3

Forschungsdatenmanagement und Data Sharing qualitativer Daten – Eine Handreichung.

Mozygemba, K., Gebel, T., Hanekop, H., Köchling, S., Lösch, T., Reineke, S., & Schierbaum, K. (2026).
Forschungsdatenmanagement und Data Sharing qualitativer Daten – Eine Handreichung. Bremen: KonsortSWD Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/4334

Identifying bots through LLM-generated text in open narrative responses: A proof-of-concept study.

Claaßen, J., Höhne, J. K., Bach, R., & Haensch, A.-C. (2026).
Identifying bots through LLM-generated text in open narrative responses: A proof-of-concept study. Social Science Computer Review (online first). https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393251408022

Zur Funktion und Produktion von (Berufungs‑)Akten: Eine qualitative Untersuchung.

Gerchen, A. (2026).
Zur Funktion und Produktion von (Berufungs‑)Akten: Eine qualitative Untersuchung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (KZfSS) (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-025-01039-4
Abstract

Records are often approached positivistically, read as evidence of the information they contain; this applies both in an everyday context and in a scientific approach to records as data material. This qualitative interview study contributes to the epistemological reflection of records. Against the background of the analytical approach to records as artefacts, these are understood in terms of how they came into being. Using the example of records of appointment procedures for professorships at German universities, the study examines the question of which functions the records fulfil and how they are produced based on seminarrative expert interviews.

Offene oder proprietäre Daten? Digitalisierung, Kommerzialisierung und Nutzung von Forschungsinformation.

Bartl, G., Krüger, A., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2026).
Offene oder proprietäre Daten? Digitalisierung, Kommerzialisierung und Nutzung von Forschungsinformation. Forschung & Lehre, 2026(1), 20-22.

Daten und Analysen für die Hochschulen: Evidenznutzung als Gegenstand der Hochschulforschung?

Wegner, A., Thiedig, C., & Krempkow, R. (2025).
Daten und Analysen für die Hochschulen: Evidenznutzung als Gegenstand der Hochschulforschung? In Webler, W.-D. (Hrsg.), Entwicklung und Stand der Hochschulforschung in Deutschland. Hochschulen erforschen sich selbst – oder gerade auch nicht! (S. 367-397). Bielefeld: UVW UniversitätsVerlag Webler.

Contact

Anja Gottburgsen
Dr. Anja Gottburgsen +49 511 450670-912