AI‘s Accountability for not addressing socioeconomic inequalities: The Case of a LLM- Supported Research Consultant on SDGs. Ottaviani, M. (2024, Oktober). AI‘s Accountability for not addressing socioeconomic inequalities: The Case of a LLM- Supported Research Consultant on SDGs. Vortrag auf dem Kolloquium Colloquium of the Professorship of Practical Philosophy, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
|
Determinants of cognitive mobility. Mom, C., Möller, T., & van den Besselaar, P. (2024, Oktober). Determinants of cognitive mobility. Vortrag auf dem Symposium Scholarly Migration and Mobility Symposium, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock.
|
A Roundtable Discussion on Innovation and Technology in Peer Review. Heßelmann, F., Porter, S., & Leonard, C. (2024, September). Teilnahme an der Podiumsdiskussion A Roundtable Discussion on Innovation and Technology in Peer Review Peer Review Week 2024, moderiert von Dr. Ioana Craciun and Dr. Enric Sayas, online.
|
Aktuelles von der Kommission für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland. Both, G. (2024, September). Aktuelles von der Kommission für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland. Vortrag auf der Tagung NuTa HISinOne-RES / HISinOne-DOC, HIS eG, Hannover.
|
Improving Transparency and Quality of Bibliometric Methods and Reporting. Haustein, S., Ng, J. Y., Stephen, D., Schniedermann, A., Stahlschmidt, S., ... & Glänzel, W. (2024, September). Session Improving Transparency and Quality of Bibliometric Methods and Reporting auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin, Germany.
|
How accurate are Scopus publication counts of researchers? A survey-bibliometric comparison for Germany. Fenton, A., Donner, P., Ambrasat, J., Fabian, G., & Heger, C. (2024, September). How accurate are Scopus publication counts of researchers? A survey-bibliometric comparison for Germany. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin.
Abstract
The number of researchers' publications is a widely used proxy measure for scientific output, individual achievement, and performance. Despite well-known criticism from the bibliometric community, the use of bibliometric databases as a basis for measuring publication output is widespread. At the same time, there are established survey instruments that also measure the publication output per researcher. We use survey-bibliometric matching with Scopus publication records to compare the alternative publication counts. A Scopus author ID match could be found for 70 % of the respondent researchers. The number of publications per researcher varies greatly between these data sources. [...]
|
Researcher mobility and individual research agendas. Donner, P., & Blümel, C. (2024, September). Researcher mobility and individual research agendas. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin.
Abstract
This study investigates whether researchers whose published research record is more thematically broad —covering more, and more semantically distant, topics— are also characterized by specific patterns in their mobility between research organizations and countries. We study a large sample of productive authors in STEM fields who have been active in Germany. Our results show that specific types of international mobility go together with slightly elevated epistemic breadth. Some disciplines, such as geosciences and astronomy, are comprised of researchers with low average epistemic breadth, while others, primarily computer science subfields, have many high-epistemic breadth researchers.
|
Open and overlooked: the penalties for preprint open access papers and translated journals in citation analysis. Donner, P. (2024, September). Open and overlooked: the penalties for preprint open access papers and translated journals in citation analysis. Poster auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin.
Abstract
The citations to open access preprint versions of papers and citations to papers in journals translated to English are not regularly counted in major proprietary citation index databases or in ordinary bibliometric research assessment even though they arguably reflect a true part of a work’s scientific impact. Here we explore the extent of these phenomena using Web of Science data.
|
Investigation of the external validity of the 2004 German Science Foundation author contribution calculation recommendation for medical schools’ performance-based funding systems. Donner, P. (2024, September). Investigation of the external validity of the 2004 German Science Foundation author contribution calculation recommendation for medical schools’ performance-based funding systems. Poster auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin.
Abstract
This study examines how well an idiosyncratic authorship counting rule for co-authored publications recommended by the German Science Foundation (DFG) for medical schools and widely used in performance-based funding systems aligns with the empirical evidence. The DFG rule and two other co-author credit rules are compared with empirical data of percentage contribution statements of authors of co-authored papers in medicine.
|
Are peer review duration and publication delay research quality signals? Donner, P. (2024, September). Are peer review duration and publication delay research quality signals? Poster auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin.
Abstract
Here we study how the lengths of the periods from submission to acceptance (review duration) and from acceptance to publication (publication delay) relate to research quality as operationalized by F1000Prime recommendations for a large dataset of publications from the life and health sciences. We find a statistically detectable relationship between shorter peer review duration and recommendations but its effect size is negligibly small.
|
Evidence base of Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines – A bibliometric comparison of Germany and the UK. Aman, V., & Sorgatz, N. (2024, September). Evidence base of Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines – A bibliometric comparison of Germany and the UK. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin, Deutschland.
|
Is academic freedom associated with strong science? Lovakov, A. (2024, September). Is academic freedom associated with strong science? Vortrag auf der Konferenz The 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin, Germany.
|
Assessing Bibliodiversity through Reference Lists: A Text Analysis Approach. Cruz Romero, R., Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2024, September). Assessing Bibliodiversity through Reference Lists: A Text Analysis Approach. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin.
|
Bridging the evidence use gap between higher education research and science studies, policy and practice – Notions and functions of intermediaries. Wegner, A. (2024, September). Bridging the evidence use gap between higher education research and science studies, policy and practice – Notions and functions of intermediaries. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin.
|
Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond. Tcypina, A. (2024, September). Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin, Deutschland.
|
