Menu

Presentations and conferences

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um den KDSF und die KFiD.

Biesenbender, S., & Petersohn, S. (2024, Mai).
Aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um den KDSF und die KFiD. Vortrag im Rahmen der Informationsveranstaltung zum KDSF-Standard für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland, Geschäftsstelle der KFiD, BMBF und Projektträger DLR.

Anfeindungen gegen Forschende: Eine Gefahr für die Wissenschaftsfreiheit?

Blümel, C. (2024, Mai).
Anfeindungen gegen Forschende: Eine Gefahr für die Wissenschaftsfreiheit? Vortrag auf dem Symposium Wissenschaftsfreiheit unter Druck?, Wissenschaft im Dialog, Potsdam.

The platformization of expertise and the ambiguous worth of Altmetrics.

Leckert, M., & Köchling, S. (2024, Mai).
The platformization of expertise and the ambiguous worth of Altmetrics. Vortrag auf der Tagung Expertise in Digitaler Transformation, Forschungsgruppe "Reorganisation von Wissenspraktiken" am Weizenbaum Institut in Kooperation mit der DGS-Sektion "Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung", Weizenbaum-Institut, Berlin.
Abstract

Expertise in research (e-)valuation is a currently debated matter (CoARA, 2022; DORA, 2012; Wilsdon et al., 2015). The Altmetrics- (Priem et al., 2010) and the Leiden Manifesto (2015) exemplified diametrical visions of how expertise in assessing research should be distributed and practiced (Leckert, 2021). As inherently ambiguous measures, Altmetrics offer insights into how new forms of expertise arise, namely platformized information brokerage. We analyze how multi-dimensional ambivalences around Altmetrics are silenced by motifs of discursive convergence in order to show a) how research assessment is induced with new objectives, and b) how new forms of expertise re-distribute competences and responsibilities in research (e-) valuation.

Reporting guidelines and their impact on papers, practices, and patterns in biomedical research.

Schniedermann, A. (2024, Mai).
Reporting guidelines and their impact on papers, practices, and patterns in biomedical research. Vortrag auf dem Workshop Research Seminar, Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, Netherlands.

Research Information Systems.

Biesenbender, S. (2024, Mai).
Research Information Systems. Impulsvortrag im Rahmen des Virtual Brainstorm der CoARA WG on Supporting the alignment of research assessment systems with CoARA in biomedical disciplines through administrative reforms and governance, Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA).

Public participation and transparency: Does open governance promote inclusion and accountability?

Cruz Romero, R. (2024, Mai).
Public participation and transparency: Does open governance promote inclusion and accountability? Vortrag auf der Konferenz 8th Global Conference on Transparency Research (GCTR), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract

The study offers a longitudinal-comparative approach, qualitatively analysing the role of transparency and public participation within the number of commitments, the level of completion, and the performance reported in each action plan submitted to the OGP. The analysis will centre on five cases, each highlighting different stages and different engagement levels to the OGP structures and principles. The findings highlight tendencies in multi-level governance models regarding official goals and (self-)reporting biases vis-a-vis independently assessments. The study offers policymakers and stakeholders a critical insight into potential lines of action to improve inclusion and accountability within an open governance paradigm.

„Wie nutzen Hochschulen Befragungs- und Prozessdaten? - Diskussion der Auswertungsstrategie und Einblicke in die Fallstudien im Projekt NuDHe“.

Wegner, A., & Thiedig, C. (2024, Mai).
„Wie nutzen Hochschulen Befragungs- und Prozessdaten? - Diskussion der Auswertungsstrategie und Einblicke in die Fallstudien im Projekt NuDHe“. Vortrag im Rahmen des Forschungskolloquiums der Abteilung 2 "Forschungssystem und Wissenschaftsdynamik", DZHW, Berlin.

Trust by transparency? How can Open Science tools reform the values for science?

Schniedermann, A. (2024, Mai).
Trust by transparency? How can Open Science tools reform the values for science? Vortrag auf der Konferenz STS CONF GRAZ, TU Graz, Graz, Österreich.

Researchers’ Disciplinary Perspectives on Science-Society Relations: Insights from an Online Survey on Knowledge Transfer.

Just, A., & Janßen, M. (2024, Mai).
Researchers’ Disciplinary Perspectives on Science-Society Relations: Insights from an Online Survey on Knowledge Transfer. Vortrag auf der Konferenz STS CONF GRAZ, TU Graz, Graz, Österreich.

Is trust in software a disciplinary practice? Yes. But no.

Hartstein, J., Schniedermann, A., & Schwichtenberg, N. (2024, Mai).
Is trust in software a disciplinary practice? Yes. But no. Vortrag auf der Konferenz STS CONF GRAZ, TU Graz, Graz, Österreich.

The structure of science and the trajectories of its development in the post-Soviet countries.

Lovakov, A. (2024, April).
The structure of science and the trajectories of its development in the post-Soviet countries. Vortrag auf dem Kolloquium I²SoS, Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of Science (ISOS), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Neuere Entwicklungen zum KDSF-Standard.

Biesenbender, S. (2024, April).
Neuere Entwicklungen zum KDSF-Standard. Vortrag im Rahmen des Netzwerktreffens "FIS Niedersachsen", Universität Osnabrück & Anwender*innengruppe FIS Niedersachsen, Osnabrück. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11059725

KDSF-Module als Standards für die Berichtslegung.

Biesenbender, S. (2024, April).
KDSF-Module als Standards für die Berichtslegung. Vortrag im Rahmen des Workshops mit Vertreter*innen aus Wissenschaftsministerien zum Thema Forschungsinformationen und -berichterstattung, Kommission für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland (KFiD).

Persistence of empirically disconfirmed biased methodology to credit co-author contributions in science studies.

Donner, P. (2024, April).
Persistence of empirically disconfirmed biased methodology to credit co-author contributions in science studies. Vortrag auf dem Symposium Asia-Pacific Symposium on Informetrics, Department of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Abstract

In this talk I lay out which broad classes of bibliometric co-author "counting" methods exist, whether they are in agreement with empirical data and which class is used most in practice. So far unpublished new data on relative co-author contributions to papers will be analyzed for this purpose. The currently dominating method class is found to have a poor validity track record and explanations are sought to understand its paradoxical success.

Aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um den KDSF und die KFiD.

Biesenbender, S., & Petersohn, S. (2024, April).
Aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um den KDSF und die KFiD. Vortrag im Rahmen der Informationsveranstaltung zum KDSF-Standard für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland, Geschäftsstelle der KFiD & Projektgruppe FIS Thüringer Hochschulen.
Show previous 15 presentations and conferences   Show 15 more presentations and conferences
Show 00 more presentations and conferences

Contact

Clemens Blümel
Clemens Blümel Acting Head +49 30 2064177-31
Stephan Stahlschmidt
Dr. Stephan Stahlschmidt Acting Head +49 30 2064177-18
Peter van den Besselaar
Prof. Dr. Peter van den Besselaar Acting Head +49 30 2064177-0
Guido Speiser
Dr. Guido Speiser Deputy Head +49 30 2064177-24

Projects

All research department projects

Staff

All research department staff

Publications

All research department publications

Presentations and conferences

All research department presentations and conferences