Presentations and conferences
1000 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-555 556-570 571-585 586-600 601-615 616-630 631-645 646-660 661-675 676-690 691-705 706-720 721-735 736-750 751-765 766-780 781-795 796-810 811-825 826-840 841-855 856-870 871-885 886-900 901-915 916-930 931-945 946-960 961-975 976-990 991-1000
Was beeinflusst die Nutzung von Befragungs- und Prozessdaten in der Hochschulentwicklung? Zwischenergebnisse aus dem NuDHe-Projekt.Thiedig, C. (2024, Oktober).Was beeinflusst die Nutzung von Befragungs- und Prozessdaten in der Hochschulentwicklung? Zwischenergebnisse aus dem NuDHe-Projekt. Impulsvortrag auf dem Workshop HSI-Workshop zum Monitoring von Internationalisierungsstrategien, HSI-Monitor. |
Empowering IT-Supported Research Management: Leveraging Data Science Methods for Informed Decisions.Azeroual, O. (2024, Oktober).Empowering IT-Supported Research Management: Leveraging Data Science Methods for Informed Decisions. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 3rd International Conference on Digitalization and Management Innovation (DMI2024), Beijing Wuzi University and Xiangnan University, Beijing, China. Abstract
In today’s research management, integrating Information Technology (IT) and data science enhances decision-making. This paper explores the role of IT-supported systems, like Research Information Systems (RIS), in leveraging data science for informed decisions. It highlights the importance of merging IT infrastructure with advanced analytics to enable data-driven insights and optimize management strategies. Through literature reviews and case studies, the paper shows how RIS empowers organizations to utilize data science effectively. Additionally, it discusses challenges, opportunities, and future directions for advancing IT-supported research management practices. |
Bedingungskonstellationen für die Nutzung befragungs- und prozessbasierter Daten in der Hochschulentwicklung (NuDHe) - Diskussion der Projektergebnisse.Wegner, A. (2024, Oktober).Workshop Bedingungskonstellationen für die Nutzung befragungs- und prozessbasierter Daten in der Hochschulentwicklung (NuDHe) - Diskussion der Projektergebnisse im Rahmen des Netzwerktreffens, UniWiND-Netzwerk Nachwuchsinformationen (NeNa). |
AI‘s Accountability for not addressing socioeconomic inequalities: The Case of a LLM- Supported Research Consultant on SDGs.Ottaviani, M. (2024, Oktober).AI‘s Accountability for not addressing socioeconomic inequalities: The Case of a LLM- Supported Research Consultant on SDGs. Vortrag auf dem Kolloquium Colloquium of the Professorship of Practical Philosophy, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland. |
Insights into bibliometric methods to trace international mobility and associated knowledge flows.Aman, V. (2024, Oktober).Insights into bibliometric methods to trace international mobility and associated knowledge flows. Impulsvortrag auf dem Symposium Scholarly Migration and Mobility, Max-Planck-Institut für demografische Forschung (MPIDR), Rostock. |
A Roundtable Discussion on Innovation and Technology in Peer Review.Heßelmann, F., Porter, S., & Leonard, C. (2024, September).Teilnahme an der Podiumsdiskussion A Roundtable Discussion on Innovation and Technology in Peer Review Peer Review Week 2024, moderiert von Dr. Ioana Craciun and Dr. Enric Sayas, online. |
Aktuelles von der Kommission für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland.Both, G. (2024, September).Aktuelles von der Kommission für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland. Vortrag auf der Tagung NuTa HISinOne-RES / HISinOne-DOC, HIS eG, Hannover. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912663 |
Improving Transparency and Quality of Bibliometric Methods and Reporting.Haustein, S., Ng, J. Y., Stephen, D., Schniedermann, A., Stahlschmidt, S., ... & Glänzel, W. (2024, September).Session Improving Transparency and Quality of Bibliometric Methods and Reporting auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin, Germany. |
How accurate are Scopus publication counts of researchers? A survey-bibliometric comparison for Germany.Fenton, A., Donner, P., Ambrasat, J., Fabian, G., & Heger, C. (2024, September).How accurate are Scopus publication counts of researchers? A survey-bibliometric comparison for Germany. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin. Abstract
The number of researchers' publications is a widely used proxy measure for scientific output, individual achievement, and performance. Despite well-known criticism from the bibliometric community, the use of bibliometric databases as a basis for measuring publication output is widespread. At the same time, there are established survey instruments that also measure the publication output per researcher. We use survey-bibliometric matching with Scopus publication records to compare the alternative publication counts. A Scopus author ID match could be found for 70 % of the respondent researchers. The number of publications per researcher varies greatly between these data sources. [...] |
Researcher mobility and individual research agendas.Donner, P., & Blümel, C. (2024, September).Researcher mobility and individual research agendas. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin. Abstract
This study investigates whether researchers whose published research record is more thematically broad —covering more, and more semantically distant, topics— are also characterized by specific patterns in their mobility between research organizations and countries. We study a large sample of productive authors in STEM fields who have been active in Germany. Our results show that specific types of international mobility go together with slightly elevated epistemic breadth. Some disciplines, such as geosciences and astronomy, are comprised of researchers with low average epistemic breadth, while others, primarily computer science subfields, have many high-epistemic breadth researchers. |
Open and overlooked: the penalties for preprint open access papers and translated journals in citation analysis.Donner, P. (2024, September).Open and overlooked: the penalties for preprint open access papers and translated journals in citation analysis. Poster auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin. Abstract
The citations to open access preprint versions of papers and citations to papers in journals translated to English are not regularly counted in major proprietary citation index databases or in ordinary bibliometric research assessment even though they arguably reflect a true part of a work’s scientific impact. Here we explore the extent of these phenomena using Web of Science data. |
Investigation of the external validity of the 2004 German Science Foundation author contribution calculation recommendation for medical schools’ performance-based funding systems.Donner, P. (2024, September).Investigation of the external validity of the 2004 German Science Foundation author contribution calculation recommendation for medical schools’ performance-based funding systems. Poster auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin. Abstract
This study examines how well an idiosyncratic authorship counting rule for co-authored publications recommended by the German Science Foundation (DFG) for medical schools and widely used in performance-based funding systems aligns with the empirical evidence. The DFG rule and two other co-author credit rules are compared with empirical data of percentage contribution statements of authors of co-authored papers in medicine. |
Are peer review duration and publication delay research quality signals?Donner, P. (2024, September).Are peer review duration and publication delay research quality signals? Poster auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin. Abstract
Here we study how the lengths of the periods from submission to acceptance (review duration) and from acceptance to publication (publication delay) relate to research quality as operationalized by F1000Prime recommendations for a large dataset of publications from the life and health sciences. We find a statistically detectable relationship between shorter peer review duration and recommendations but its effect size is negligibly small. |
Evidence base of Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines – A bibliometric comparison of Germany and the UK.Aman, V., & Sorgatz, N. (2024, September).Evidence base of Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines – A bibliometric comparison of Germany and the UK. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators 2024 (STI), Berlin, Deutschland. |
Contact


