Presentations and conferences
1000 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-555 556-570 571-585 586-600 601-615 616-630 631-645 646-660 661-675 676-690 691-705 706-720 721-735 736-750 751-765 766-780 781-795 796-810 811-825 826-840 841-855 856-870 871-885 886-900 901-915 916-930 931-945 946-960 961-975 976-990 991-1000
“And the winner is…” – PIDs for research awards and prizes in the KDSF Standard for Research Information.Both, G., & Güdler, J. (2024, Juni).“And the winner is…” – PIDs for research awards and prizes in the KDSF Standard for Research Information. Vortrag auf der Tagung PiDfest, National Library of Technology, Prague, Czech Republic. https://doi.org/10.48813/0j74-8x07 Abstract
Research prizes shape careers in science and humanities. One prize often leads to another. Research organizations pride themselves with winners of prestigious prizes. Yet, it can be challenging for research organizations to keep track of their laureates. In our talk we will introduce you to our upcoming registry and metadata service for research awards and prizes which will tackle this challenge. The registry will provide PIDs and metadata for relevant research prizes and awards, such as, Shaw Prizes, Holberg prize, and Leibniz prize but also for academic honors, such as the appointment of honorary professors and the acquisition of a prestigious ERC grant. The planned metadata include information on subject, country of origin [...] |
Why do some retracted articles continue to get cited? Interventions in the scientific discourse and how citing communities deal with epistemic risk using the example of retractions.Schmidt, M. (2024, Juni).Why do some retracted articles continue to get cited? Interventions in the scientific discourse and how citing communities deal with epistemic risk using the example of retractions. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 8th World Conference on Research Integrity (WCRI), World Conferences on Research Integrity Foundation, Athens, Greece. |
Aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um den KDSF und die KFiD.Biesenbender, S., & Petersohn, S. (2024, Mai).Aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um den KDSF und die KFiD. Vortrag im Rahmen der Informationsveranstaltung zum KDSF-Standard für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland, Geschäftsstelle der KFiD, BMBF und Projektträger DLR. |
The platformization of expertise and the ambiguous worth of Altmetrics.Leckert, M., & Köchling, S. (2024, Mai).The platformization of expertise and the ambiguous worth of Altmetrics. Vortrag auf der Tagung Expertise in Digitaler Transformation, Forschungsgruppe "Reorganisation von Wissenspraktiken" am Weizenbaum Institut in Kooperation mit der DGS-Sektion "Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung", Weizenbaum-Institut, Berlin. Abstract
Expertise in research (e-)valuation is a currently debated matter (CoARA, 2022; DORA, 2012; Wilsdon et al., 2015). The Altmetrics- (Priem et al., 2010) and the Leiden Manifesto (2015) exemplified diametrical visions of how expertise in assessing research should be distributed and practiced (Leckert, 2021). As inherently ambiguous measures, Altmetrics offer insights into how new forms of expertise arise, namely platformized information brokerage. We analyze how multi-dimensional ambivalences around Altmetrics are silenced by motifs of discursive convergence in order to show a) how research assessment is induced with new objectives, and b) how new forms of expertise re-distribute competences and responsibilities in research (e-) valuation. |
Reporting guidelines and their impact on papers, practices, and patterns in biomedical research.Schniedermann, A. (2024, Mai).Reporting guidelines and their impact on papers, practices, and patterns in biomedical research. Vortrag auf dem Workshop Research Seminar, Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, Netherlands. |
Research Information Systems.Biesenbender, S. (2024, Mai).Research Information Systems. Impulsvortrag im Rahmen des Virtual Brainstorm der CoARA WG on Supporting the alignment of research assessment systems with CoARA in biomedical disciplines through administrative reforms and governance, Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA). |
Public participation and transparency: Does open governance promote inclusion and accountability?Cruz Romero, R. (2024, Mai).Public participation and transparency: Does open governance promote inclusion and accountability? Vortrag auf der Konferenz 8th Global Conference on Transparency Research (GCTR), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. Abstract
The study offers a longitudinal-comparative approach, qualitatively analysing the role of transparency and public participation within the number of commitments, the level of completion, and the performance reported in each action plan submitted to the OGP. The analysis will centre on five cases, each highlighting different stages and different engagement levels to the OGP structures and principles. The findings highlight tendencies in multi-level governance models regarding official goals and (self-)reporting biases vis-a-vis independently assessments. The study offers policymakers and stakeholders a critical insight into potential lines of action to improve inclusion and accountability within an open governance paradigm. |
„Wie nutzen Hochschulen Befragungs- und Prozessdaten? - Diskussion der Auswertungsstrategie und Einblicke in die Fallstudien im Projekt NuDHe“.Wegner, A., & Thiedig, C. (2024, Mai).„Wie nutzen Hochschulen Befragungs- und Prozessdaten? - Diskussion der Auswertungsstrategie und Einblicke in die Fallstudien im Projekt NuDHe“. Vortrag im Rahmen des Forschungskolloquiums der Abteilung 2 "Forschungssystem und Wissenschaftsdynamik", DZHW, Berlin. |
Researchers’ Disciplinary Perspectives on Science-Society Relations: Insights from an Online Survey on Knowledge Transfer.Just, A., & Janßen, M. (2024, Mai).Researchers’ Disciplinary Perspectives on Science-Society Relations: Insights from an Online Survey on Knowledge Transfer. Vortrag auf der Konferenz STS CONF GRAZ, TU Graz, Graz, Österreich. |
The structure of science and the trajectories of its development in the post-Soviet countries.Lovakov, A. (2024, April).The structure of science and the trajectories of its development in the post-Soviet countries. Vortrag auf dem Kolloquium I²SoS, Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of Science (ISOS), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. |
Contact
