Studied Sociology, psychology, and communication studies in Dresden, Leipzig and Berlin where he graduated in sociology in 2007. From 2007 and 2010 he worked at the Fraunhofer Institute of Innovation and Systems Research in Karlsruhe in different projects on innovation policy and the governance of emerging technologies. In 2010, he began working as a teaching coordinator, designing and implementing the MA Program "Science Studies" which has been successfully introduced at HU Berlin in 2012. At the same time, he was also involved in a project on the regulation of data practices in German universities. Between December 2013 and 2016 he worked as a research associate in the DFG funded project "Reviews as legitimizing resource in emerging research fields" focusing on the case of synthetic biology. He was also involved in a project on core concepts, organizational and evaluation of Translational Medical Research funded by the Berlin Institute of Health. His research interests include: science and technology studies, innovation studies, network analysis, governance of biomedicine (with a specific focus on synthetic biology), as well as studies into digital scholarly practices. Clemens Blümel joined the DZHW in January 2017.

Clemens Blümel
Research Area Research System and Science Dynamics
Researcher
- +49 30 2064177-31
List of projects
List of publications
Scholars Under Attack — Navigating the dark side of public engagement and science communication in a politicised (online) environment.Fähnrich, B., Almeida, C., Blümel, C., Edler, D., Fecher, B., Mede, N., & Sokolovska, N. (2026).Scholars Under Attack — Navigating the dark side of public engagement and science communication in a politicised (online) environment. Journal of Science Communication 25(4).(Abgerufen am: 09.07.2026) (online first). https://doi.org/10.22323/411520260607074432 Abstract
Hostility towards science has emerged as a significant challenge in contemporary science communication, particularly in increasingly politicised and digitally mediated public environments. Scholars across diverse disciplines are confronted with harassment, delegitimisation, political interference, disinformation, and personal attacks, especially when engaging in public communication. This editorial introduces the JCOM commentary set “Scholars Under Attack” and situates hostility towards science within broader transformations of media ecosystems, political polarisation, and contested epistemic authority. |
Patterns of attacks against scholars in Germany: controversial topics as contexts and accelerators of science hostility.Blümel, C., & Brandt, E. (2026).Patterns of attacks against scholars in Germany: controversial topics as contexts and accelerators of science hostility. Journal of Science Communication 25(4).(Abgerufen am: 09.07.2026) (online first). https://doi.org/10.22323/369120260520202026 Abstract
In this commentary, we examine patterns of attacks against scholars focusing on the case of Germany. Drawing on the responses to open and closed questions in a recent survey of 2,600 German researchers, we identify context- and field-specific patterns of science hostility. While most responding researchers do not experience severe attacks, those engaged in specific fields may be at a higher risk of being threatened. We argue that attacks on researchers may not be perceived as acts of hostility against scientific institutions but rather emerge in the context of controversial topics. |
Understanding hostility towards researchers. A collection of empirical insights into science hostility and attacks on the integrity of researchers.Blümel, C., Fähnrich, B., Fecher, B., Sokolovska, N., & Brandt, E. (2026).Understanding hostility towards researchers. A collection of empirical insights into science hostility and attacks on the integrity of researchers. In Sokolovska, N. (Hrsg.), Tackling hostility towards scientists. Five complementary educational resources to equip institutions and individual researchers with knowledge and skills. (S. 6-11). Berlin: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19468307 |
Contemporary global research cultures: results from a global survey about research conditions.Lovakov, A., Blümel, C., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2026).Contemporary global research cultures: results from a global survey about research conditions. F1000Research, 2026(15), 591. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.171842.1 |
Trendumfrage Forschungsdateninfrastrukturen 2024 - Daten- und Methodenbericht.Hartstein, J., Blümel, C., & Klein, D. (2025).Trendumfrage Forschungsdateninfrastrukturen 2024 - Daten- und Methodenbericht. Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.21249/dzhw:base4nfdi-dmr:2.0.0 Abstract
The Trend Survey Research Data Infrastructures 2024 is part of the accompanying research of the Basic Services for the National Research Data Infrastructure (Base4NFDI). The trend survey captures the perception, use and evaluation of established and new data infrastructures and services in the German research landscape. The focus in on the perspective of (potential) users. |
Open Research Tools: Stand und Herausforderungen im Spannungsfeld von Forschungssoftware, Offenheit und digitaler Infrastruktur.Streicher, J., Schütz, M., Blümel, C., & Schniedermann, A. (2025).Open Research Tools: Stand und Herausforderungen im Spannungsfeld von Forschungssoftware, Offenheit und digitaler Infrastruktur. Graz, Wien, Klagenfurt: Joanneum Research. Abstract
Digital tools, software and related infrastructures are central to modern science and research. With regards to open science, open software tools are becoming increasingly important as they promote and support collaboration, reproducibility and access to resources. Researchers are actively contributing to the development of these “Open Research Tools (ORT)” and are thus helping to shape the digital transformation of the science system. This change is also noticeable in Germany, where the area of research software is gaining increasing importance. The aim of the study is... |
Trendumfrage Forschungsdateninfrastrukturen 2024.Hartstein, J., Blümel, C., & Klein, D. (2025).Trendumfrage Forschungsdateninfrastrukturen 2024. Daten- und Methodenbericht. Hannover: DZHW. Abstract
The Trend Survey Research Data Infrastructures 2024 is part of the accompanying research of the Basic Services for the National Research Data Infrastructure (Base4NFDI). The trend survey captures the perception, use and evaluation of established and new data infrastructures and services in the German research landscape. The focus in on the perspective of (potential) users. |
Ergebnisse der Trendumfrage Forschungsdateninfrastrukturen 2024.Hartstein, J., & Blümel, C. (2024).Ergebnisse der Trendumfrage Forschungsdateninfrastrukturen 2024. Hannover: Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14093010 |
Researcher mobility, co-authorship and individual research agendas.Donner, P., & Blümel, C. (2024).Researcher mobility, co-authorship and individual research agendas. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13943868 Abstract
This study investigates whether researchers whose published research record is more thematically broad -covering more, and more semantically distant, topics- are also characterized by specific patterns in their mobility between research organizations and countries and their co-authorship patterns. We study a large sample of productive authors in STEM fields who have been active in Germany. Our results show that specific types of international mobility go together with slightly elevated epistemic breadth. But scientists with larger co-author networks have relatively greater epistemic breadth. [...] |
Ideas Lab as funding instrument: navigating tensions in establishing transdisciplinary research projects.Kaisler, R., Blümel, C., & Palfinger, T. (2024).Ideas Lab as funding instrument: navigating tensions in establishing transdisciplinary research projects. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews (online first). https://doi.org/10.1177/03080188241276363 |
Ordering the past, envisioning future(s): how review articles in synthetic biology make use of heterogeneous expectations.Blümel, C. (2023).Ordering the past, envisioning future(s): how review articles in synthetic biology make use of heterogeneous expectations. Futures (online first). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103302 Abstract
This article deals with expectation dynamics in the field of synthetic biology. The article draws on scholarly review articles as the main material, complemented by expert interviews conducted with scholars from the field. The aim is to explore how expectations change over time and how they are used to justify and move the field. Drawing from conceptual advances of the sociology of expectations, I show how expectations are increasingly linked at different levels (the landscape, sector, and niche level) and how they support and justify the field among different audiences. |
Quo Vadis Science Diplomacy – Wissenschaftsmobilität und -kooperation nach der Zeitenwende.Blümel, C., & Vögtle, E. M. (2023).Quo Vadis Science Diplomacy – Wissenschaftsmobilität und -kooperation nach der Zeitenwende. (DZHW Brief 05|2023). Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.34878/2023.05.dzhw_brief |
What happens to science when it communicates openly?Blümel, C., & Fecher, B. (31. Oktober 2023).What happens to science when it communicates openly [Blogbeitrag]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10037220 Abstract
The contribution deals with what happens when science opens up and communicates’ and the emerging challenges for future scientific communication. |
Wissenschaftskulturen in Deutschland.Ploder, M., Müller, R., & Blümel, C. (2023).Wissenschaftskulturen in Deutschland. Eine Studie im Auftrag der VolkswagenStiftung. Hannover: VolkswagenStiftung.
|