Publications

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

„Zwang ist nie gut, weil er die intrinsische Motivation killt“.

Adrian, D., & Bozukova, M. (22. September 2022).
„Zwang ist nie gut, weil er die intrinsische Motivation killt“ [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://www.wissenschaftskommunikation.de/zwang-ist-nie-gut-weil-er-die-intrinsische-motivation-killt-61843/

Forschungskooperation im Verbund.

Hückstädt, M., Janßen, M., Oberschelp, A., Wagner, N., Weinmann, C., & Winde, M. (2022).
Forschungskooperation im Verbund. Future Lab: Kooperationsgovernance - Diskussionspapier 2022 (6). Essen: Stifterverband für die deutsche Wissenschaft e.V.
Abstract

Collaborative research is becoming increasingly important. By linking competences and experiences, sharing cost-intensive resources and bringing together different disciplinary perspectives, synergy effects are generated and innovative research projects are promoted. However, the collaboration of researchers also involves risks that can be traced back to the framework conditions that characterise the collaboration of the participants. The DEKiF project ("Determinants and Effects of Cooperations in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Research Associations") examines the implementation of collaborative research within the framework of different sub-studies with the aim of mapping cooperation problems.

Retrieving Adversarial Cliques in Cognitive Communities: A New Conceptual Framework for Scientific Knowledge Graphs.

Fabre, R., Azeroual, O., Bellot, P., Schöpfel, J., & Egret, D. (2022).
Retrieving Adversarial Cliques in Cognitive Communities: A New Conceptual Framework for Scientific Knowledge Graphs. Future Internet, 2022, 14(9), 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14090262

Factors influencing the academic career – an event history analysis.

Mom, C., van den Besselaar, P., & Möller, T. (2022).
Factors influencing the academic career – an event history analysis. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicator (STI 2022), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6975565

What is researcher independence and how can it be measured?

Möller, T., van den Besselaar, P., & Mom, C. (2022).
What is researcher independence and how can it be measured? 26th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2022), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6975311

Algorithmic identification of Ph.D. thesis-related publications: a proof-of-concept study.

Donner, P. (2022).
Algorithmic identification of Ph.D. thesis-related publications: a proof-of-concept study. Scientometrics (online first).
Abstract

In this study we propose and evaluate a method to automatically identify the journal publications that are related to a Ph.D. thesis using bibliographical data of both items. We build a manually curated ground truth dataset from German cumulative doctoral theses that explicitly list the included publications, which we match with records in the Scopus database. We then test supervised classification methods on the task of identifying the correct associated publications among high numbers of potential candidates using features of the thesis and publication records. The results indicate that this approach results in good match quality in general and with the best results attained by the “random forest” classification algorithm.

Männlichkeit im Forschungsfeld „autonomes Fahren“. Zwischen Restabilisierung und Verunsicherung.

Both, G., & Weber, L. (2022).
Männlichkeit im Forschungsfeld „autonomes Fahren“. Zwischen Restabilisierung und Verunsicherung. In Kastein, M. et al. (Hrsg.), Care-Arbeit und Gender in der digitalen Transformation (S. 103-118). Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Juventa.

On Top of the Hierarchy: How Guidelines Shape Systematic Reviewing in Biomedicine.

Schniedermann, A., Blümel, C., & Simons, A. (2022).
On Top of the Hierarchy: How Guidelines Shape Systematic Reviewing in Biomedicine. In S. Ehlers & S. Esselborn (Hrsg.), Evidence in Action between Science and Society - Constructing, Validating, and Contesting Knowledge (S. 102-126). New York: Routledge.

Forschungsinformationssysteme und Ethik: eine doppelte Herausforderung.

Azeroual, O., & Schöpfel, J. (2022).
Forschungsinformationssysteme und Ethik: eine doppelte Herausforderung. Information – Wissenschaft & Praxis, 2022, 73(4), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2021-2208

Promovierende in Deutschland. Neue Ergebnisse der Nacaps-Promovierendenstudie.

Wegner, A. (2022).
Promovierende in Deutschland. Neue Ergebnisse der Nacaps-Promovierendenstudie. Forschung & Lehre, 2022(07), 526-527.

Shaping the Qualities, Values and Standards of Science. How Reporting Guidelines Improve the Transparency of Biomedical Research.

Schniedermann, A. (2022).
Shaping the Qualities, Values and Standards of Science. How Reporting Guidelines Improve the Transparency of Biomedical Research. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. Frontiers, https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.846822 (Abgerufen am: 01.07.2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.846822

#Hanna, jetzt ist die Zeit der Daten.

Adrian, D. (2022).
#Hanna, jetzt ist die Zeit der Daten. Gastkommentar zur #IchBinHanna-Debatte. "ZEIT Wissen Drei" - Newsletter. Hamburg: Zeitverlag Gerd Bucerius GmbH & Co. KG.

Beschäftigungsbedingungen für junge Forscher*innen - ein empirischer Beitrag zu #IchBinHanna.

Berroth, L., Adrian, D., Briedis, K., & Wegner, A. (2022).
Beschäftigungsbedingungen für junge Forscher*innen - ein empirischer Beitrag zu #IchBinHanna. (DZHW Brief 04|2022). Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.34878/2022.04.dzhw_brief

How to interpret algorithmically constructed topical structures of scientific fields? A case study of citation-based mappings of the research specialty of invasion biology.

Held, M., & Velden (2022).
How to interpret algorithmically constructed topical structures of scientific fields? A case study of citation-based mappings of the research specialty of invasion biology. Quantitative Science Studies (online first). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00194
Abstract

Often, bibliometric mapping studies remain at a very abstract level when assessing the validity or accuracy of the generated maps. In this case study of citation-based mappings of a research specialty, we dig deeper into the topical structures generated by the chosen mapping approaches and examine their correspondence to a sociologically informed understanding of the research specialty in question. Our analysis highlights the variety of types of topical relatedness and epistemic interdependency that citations can stand for. Unless we assume that invasion biology is unique, our analysis suggests that global algorithmic field classification approaches that use citation links indiscriminately may struggle to reconstruct research specialties.

Standardisierte Bibliometrische Analyse der HafenCity Universität Hamburg (HCU).

Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW) (2022).
Standardisierte Bibliometrische Analyse der HafenCity Universität Hamburg (HCU). Hannover: DZHW (nicht zur Veröffentlichung vorgesehen).

Contact

Clemens Blümel
Clemens Blümel Acting Head +49 30 2064177-31
Stephan Stahlschmidt
Dr. Stephan Stahlschmidt Acting Head +49 30 2064177-18
Peter van den Besselaar
Prof. Dr. Peter van den Besselaar Acting Head +49 30 2064177-0
Guido Speiser
Dr. Guido Speiser Deputy Head +49 30 2064177-24
Nikolai Schmarbeck
Nikolai Schmarbeck Assistant +49 30 2064177-11

Projects

All research area projects

Staff

All research area staff

Publications

All research area publications

Presentations and conferences

All research area presentations and conferences