Publications
867 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-555 556-570 571-585 586-600 601-615 616-630 631-645 646-660 661-675 676-690 691-705 706-720 721-735 736-750 751-765 766-780 781-795 796-810 811-825 826-840 841-855 856-867
Nacaps 2020. Daten- und Methodenbericht zur Datenpaketversion 1.0.0 der National Academics Panel Study 2020 (1.-2. Befragungswelle).
Nacaps 2020. Daten- und Methodenbericht zur Datenpaketversion 1.0.0 der National Academics Panel Study 2020 (1.-2. Befragungswelle). Hannover: DZHW. Abstract
Nacaps, the National Academics Panel Study, is a longitudinal study of doctoral candidates and doctorate holders in Germany funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) until 2024. The project aims at providing nationwide cross-sectional and longitudinal data on doctoral candidates and doctorate holders in Germany regarding their study conditions as well as their career trajectories within and outside of academia. The Nacaps study series apply a panel design to multiple cohorts. [...] Full Abstract: https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:nac2020:1.0.0 |
Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research: what can reviewers’ comments tell us about reporting completeness?
Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research: what can reviewers’ comments tell us about reporting completeness? Quantitative Science Studies, 2026 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1162/QSS.a.496 |
Reference extraction in the bibliometric hinterlands: Recovering from domain switch with GROBID.Donner, P., & Wen, Y. (2026).Reference extraction in the bibliometric hinterlands: Recovering from domain switch with GROBID. In T. Heck, P. Mayr-Schlegel, C. Schindler, & A. M. Shahid (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the Citation Extraction and Parsing Workshop (CiteX), Frankfurt, Germany, May 28–29 (S. 40-45). Frankfurt a. M.: DIPF. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20382199 |
Data from the Researcher Mental Health Observatory STAIRCASE Survey.Lasser, J., Mol, S. T., Čontala, A., Slavec, A., de Swarte, A. Z., ... & Dhamo, X. (2026).Data from the Researcher Mental Health Observatory STAIRCASE Survey. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 14(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.136 |
Studying ‘predatory publishing’ in the context of research evaluation: conceptual and methodological challenges.Stephen, D., Cramer, M., Kulczycki, E., Reinhart, M., Vasen, F., ... & Drymioti, M. (2026).Studying ‘predatory publishing’ in the context of research evaluation: conceptual and methodological challenges. Research Evaluation, 2026 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag025 |
Understanding hostility towards researchers. A collection of empirical insights into science hostility and attacks on the integrity of researchers.Blümel, C., Fähnrich, B., Fecher, B., Sokolovska, N., & Brandt, E. (2026).Understanding hostility towards researchers. A collection of empirical insights into science hostility and attacks on the integrity of researchers. In Sokolovska, N. (Hrsg.), Tackling hostility towards scientists. Five complementary educational resources to equip institutions and individual researchers with knowledge and skills. (S. 6-11). Berlin: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19468307 |
Beyond the oligopoly: Scholarly journal publishing landscapes in Latin America and Europe.Kulczycki, E., Alonso-Gamboa, J. O., Beigel, F., Digiampietr, L., Laakso, M., ... & Vélez Cuartas, G. V. C. (2026).Beyond the oligopoly: Scholarly journal publishing landscapes in Latin America and Europe. Journal of Data and Information Science. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jdis-2025-0440/html?srsltid=AfmBOoqio8Uqria14A6c9_l933hCNAVpgwobyEs8ylWxc-kA-G5Xe21w, https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jdis-2025-0440/pdf?licenseType=open-access (Abgerufen am: 03.06.2026) (online first). Abstract
This study investigates the diversity of national scholarly journal publishing ecosystems in seven countries across Europe and Latin America: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Finland, Mexico, Poland, and Türkiye. It challenges the common perception that global scholarly publishing is dominated by international commercial publishers by examining national publishing structures beyond English speaking contexts. |
Contemporary global research cultures: results from a global survey about research conditions.Lovakov, A., Blümel, C., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2026).Contemporary global research cultures: results from a global survey about research conditions. F1000Research, 2026(15), 591. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.171842.1 |
By linking national scholarly infrastructures we can better understand the impact of global research.Donner, P., Stahlschmidt, S., Nazarovets, S., Cojocaru, I., Razmadze, M., & Sargsyan, S. (1. April 2026).By linking national scholarly infrastructures we can better understand the impact of global research [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/04/01/by-linking-national-scholarly-infrastructures-we-can-better-understand-the-impact-of-global-research/ Abstract
Global scholarly information systems provide poor coverage for social science and humanities research taking place outside of the anglophone world and in languages other than English. Paul Donner, Stephan Stahschmidt, Serhii Nazarovets, Igor Cojocaru, Irina Cojocaru, Marina Razmadze and Shushanik Sargsyan highlight a range of national initiatives taking place aimed at improving scholarly data for local and national research and argue for the value of their greater integration. |
Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Clelland, H. T., Kovacs, M., Holzmeister, F., ... & Nosek, B. A. (2026).Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences. Nature, 2026(652), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09844-9 |
Open, but uncounted: Citations to Open Access preprints and Working Papers of published papers.Donner, P. (2026).Open, but uncounted: Citations to Open Access preprints and Working Papers of published papers. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 24(1), 1-16. Abstract
The citations to open access preprint and working paper versions of papers that are also formally published in journals are not regularly counted in global multidisciplinary proprietary citation index databases, nor are they considered in most bibliometric studies. They are, however, integrated into paper citation counts in other citation databases. It can be argued that open access preprint citations reflect a relevant part of scientific impact of a work as proxied by citation counts, particularly in scientific disciplines that make extensive use of preprints/working papers for rapid open communication. Here we present a large-scale study of these usually uncounted open access preprint citations for the Web of Science database [...] |
Mehr Evidenz statt Einbildung zu Künstlicher Intelligenz in Hochschule und Wissenschaft. Zehn Thesen zu künftigen Beiträgen der Hochschulforschung.Steinhardt, I., Henke, J., Watanabe, A., Wieczorek, O., Biere, L., ... & Schneijderberg, C. (2026).Mehr Evidenz statt Einbildung zu Künstlicher Intelligenz in Hochschule und Wissenschaft. Zehn Thesen zu künftigen Beiträgen der Hochschulforschung. die hochschule, 2026(1-2). |
Policy-driven innovation: The science-policy nexus in artificial intelligence research in Germany.Cruz Romero, R., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2026).Policy-driven innovation: The science-policy nexus in artificial intelligence research in Germany. Berlin: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/mtz4d_v1 |
Contact
