A Case Study of the Epistemic Function of Citations - Implications for Citation-based Science Mapping.
Seitz, C., Schmidt, M., Schwichtenberg, N., & Velden, T. (2021). A Case Study of the Epistemic Function of Citations - Implications for Citation-based Science Mapping. In W. Glänzel, S. Heeffer, P.-S. Chi, & R. Rousseau (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (S. 1027-1032). Leuven: KU Leuven / International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (I.S.S.I.).
Abstract
The use of citations as indicators of topical relatedness of publications is common in the algorithmic mapping of the structure of science. References to source documents, however, may serve a variety of epistemic functions, and hence represent rather different dimensions of topical relatedness, such as the research methods used, the empirical objects studied, the theoretical resources build on, the research questions pursued, or the external motivation for and relevance of the work. In this case study, we explore the diversity in topical dimensions along which publications are linked in citation networks, by coding the epistemic function of in-text citations. [...]
|
The Open Innovation in Science Research Field: A Collaborative Conceptualisation Approach.
Beck, S., Bergenholtz, C., Bogers, M., Brasseur, T., Conradsen, M. L., Di Marco, D., ... & Xu, S. M. (2020).
The Open Innovation in Science Research Field: A Collaborative Conceptualisation Approach.
Industry and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274
|
How to interpret algorithmically constructed topical structures of research specialties? A case study comparing an internal and an external mapping of the topical structure of invasion biology.
Held, M., & Velden, T. (2019).
How to interpret algorithmically constructed topical structures of research specialties? A case study comparing an internal and an external mapping of the topical structure of invasion biology.
In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 1933-1939). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.
|
Exploration of reproducibility issues in scientometric research.
Velden, T., Hinze, S. Scharnhorst, A. Schneider, J.W., & Waltman, L. (2018).
Exploration of reproducibility issues in scientometric research.
In STI 2018 Conference Proceedings. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. 12-14 September 2018, Leiden, The Netherlands.
|
Topic identification challenge.
Boyack, K., Glänzel W., Gläser, J., Havemann, F., Scharnhorst, A., Thijs, B., ... & Waltmann, L. (2017).
Topic identification challenge.
Scientometrics, 111(2), 1223-1224.
|
Comparison of Topic Extraction Approaches and Solutions.
Velden, T., Boyack, K., Gläser, J., Koopman, R., Scharnhorst, A., & Wang, S. (2017).
Comparison of Topic Extraction Approaches and Solutions.
In J. Gläser, A. Scharnhorst & W. Glänzel (eds): Same data - different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science, Special Issue of Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2306-1
|
Infomap Clustering of Direct Citation Network and Topic Affinity Analysis.
Velden, T., Yan, S., & Lagoze, C. (2017).
Infomap Clustering of Direct Citation Network and Topic Affinity Analysis.
In Gläser, J., Scharnhorst, A. & Glänzel, W. (eds): Same data - different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science, Special Issue of Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2299-9
|
The Extraction of Community Structures from Publication Networks to Support Comparative Studies of Field Differences in Scientific Communication.
Velden, T., & Lagoze, C. (2013).
The Extraction of Community Structures from Publication Networks to Support Comparative Studies of Field Differences in Scientific Communication.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 64(12), 2405-2427.
|
Explaining Field Differences in Openness and Sharing in Scientific Communities.
Velden, T. (2013).
Explaining Field Differences in Openness and Sharing in Scientific Communities.
In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), February 25-27, 2013, San Antonio, TX, USA (pp. 445-458). [Best Paper Nomination].
|
Resolving Author Name Homonymy to Improve Res- olution of Structures in Co-author Networks.
Velden, T., Haque, A., & Lagoze, C. (2011).
Resolving Author Name Homonymy to Improve Res- olution of Structures in Co-author Networks.
In Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), June 13 – 17, 2011, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (pp. 241–250). [Best Paper Nomination].
|
A New Approach to Analyzing Patterns of Collaboration in Co-authorship Networks - Mesoscopic Analysis and Interpretation.
Velden T., Haque, A., & Lagoze, C. (2010).
A New Approach to Analyzing Patterns of Collaboration in Co-authorship Networks - Mesoscopic Analysis and Interpretation.
Scientometrics, 85(1), 219 – 242.
|
Communicating Chemistry.
Velden T., & Lagoze, C. (2009).
Communicating Chemistry.
Nature Chemistry 1, 673-678.
|
The Value of New Scientific Communication Models for Chemistry.
Velden, T., & Lagoze, C. (2009).
The Value of New Scientific Communication Models for Chemistry.
Whitepaper October 2009.
|
In-car GPS navigation: Engagement with and disengagement from the environment.
Leshed, G., Velden, T., Rieger, O., Kot, B., & Sengers P. (2008).
In-car GPS navigation: Engagement with and disengagement from the environment.
In Proceedings of The 26th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), April 5-10, 2008, Florence, Italy. ACM, New York, NY (pp. 1675-1684). [Best Paper Award].
|
Internet und Wissenschaft - Das Konzept von Open Access für wissenschaftliches Arbeiten.
Schlögl R., & Velden T. (2005).
Internet und Wissenschaft - Das Konzept von Open Access für wissenschaftliches Arbeiten.
In P. Hauke (Hrsg.), Bibliothekswissenschaft - quo vadis? : eine Disziplin zwischen Traditionen und Visionen. München: Saur.
|
