Articles

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Rewarding Research Data Management.

Schöpfel, J., & Azeroual, O. (2021).
Rewarding Research Data Management. In Manghi, P. et al. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of Sci-K 2021: 1st International Workshop on Scientific Knowledge Representation, Discovery, and Assessment, Apr 19 –23, 2021. Ljubljana, Slovenia: ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442442.3451367

Data Quality Strategy Selection in CRIS: Using a Hybrid Method of SWOT and BWM.

Azeroual, O., Ershadi, M. J., Azizi, A., Banihashemi, M., & Abadi, R. E. (2021).
Data Quality Strategy Selection in CRIS: Using a Hybrid Method of SWOT and BWM. Informatica - An International Journal of Computing and Informatics, 2021(45), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v45i1.2995

Research networks generated by organizational structures, co-authorships and citations: A Case Study of German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv).

Qu, Z. (2021).
Research networks generated by organizational structures, co-authorships and citations: A Case Study of German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv). arXiv. arxiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11911 (Abgerufen am: 23.04.2021).

Welches System für welchen Zweck? Abschluss der Reihe " Systemwahl " und Ausblick.

Ebert, B., Tobias, R., & Biesenbender, S. (19. April 2021).
Welches System für welchen Zweck? Abschluss der Reihe "Systemwahl" und Ausblick [Blogbeitrag]. https://doi.org/10.57689/DINI-BLOG.20210419

A Quantitative View of the Structure of Institutional Scientific Collaborations Using the Example of Berlin.

Akbaritabar, A. (2021).
A Quantitative View of the Structure of Institutional Scientific Collaborations Using the Example of Berlin. Quantitative Science Studies(1-24). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00131

Hochschulgovernance in Deutschland. Historische Entwicklungen und aktuelle Herausforderungen.

Oberschelp, A. (2021).
Hochschulgovernance in Deutschland. Historische Entwicklungen und aktuelle Herausforderungen. In P. Holderberg & C. Seipel (Hrsg.), Der wissenschaftliche Mittelbau - Arbeit, Hochschule, Demokratie (S. 82-103). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
Abstract

The article examines the development of university governance in Germany after 1945, distinguishing between the ordinariate and the group university as well as the university under the paradigm of the new governance model as stages of development. As a supplement to the classical periodization for West Germany, important aspects of the development of higher education in the GDR are addressed. The study is guided by the governance approach with its distinction of five central governance mechanisms based on the so-called "governance equalizer" (Schimank). The article concludes with an outlook on currently discussed perspectives of higher education development in Germany.

Zur Arbeitssituation des wissenschaftlichen Mittelbaus in Deutschland.

Ambrasat, J. (2021).
Zur Arbeitssituation des wissenschaftlichen Mittelbaus in Deutschland. In: Holderberg, P., & Seipel, C. (Hrsg.)(2021) Der wissenschaftliche Mittelbau – Arbeit, Hochschule, Demokratie. Beltz Juventa.

Rejection and mutation of discourses in curriculum reforms: peace education(s) in Colombia and Germany.

Pineda, P., & Celis, J. (2021).
Rejection and mutation of discourses in curriculum reforms: peace education(s) in Colombia and Germany. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1-23.
Abstract

Through content analysis of policy documents, we seek to find out why the Colombian Congress established peace education (PE) as mandatory content across all educational levels in 2014 in a postwar phase, while the German Standing Conference of Ministers of Education rejected attempts to implement PE since the Cold War. Whereas the German school curriculum has maintained a strong disciplinary structure that leads to the rejection of the local version of PE developed in the Federal Republic of Germany, either as military indoctrination or critical pedagogy, Colombia’s curriculum based on classical education is now influenced by educational bstandards and citizenship education—both influences from the United States.

Wissenschaft weltoffen kompakt 2021.

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (Hrsg.), & Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (Hrsg.) (2021).
Wissenschaft weltoffen kompakt 2021. Daten und Fakten zur Internationalität von Studium. und Forschung in Deutschland und weltweit. Bielefeld: wbv Media.

Wissenschaft weltoffen 2021 kompakt English edition.

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (Hrsg.), & Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (Hrsg.) (2021).
Wissenschaft weltoffen 2021 kompakt English edition. Facts and Figures on the International Nature of Studies and Research in Germany and Worldwide. Bielefeld: wbv Media.

Mobile and Immobile Students’ Characteristics and Programme Choices.

Vögtle, E. (2021).
Mobile and Immobile Students’ Characteristics and Programme Choices. In Cairns, D. (Hrsg.), The Palgrave Handbook of Youth Mobility and Educational Migration (S. 247-259). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64235-8
Abstract

Numerous benefits have been associated with study-related experiences abroad such as employability, wage gains, and soft-skills. Thus, the topic of international student mobility is closely connected to issues of equity and access to higher education. This chapter places special emphasis on differences in mobility rates by gender, field of study, and type of higher education institution. Eurostudent data is used to analyse credit-seeking enrolment and it is distinguished between mobility organised in the realm of programmes and independently organised short-term mobility phases. The mobility patterns of students in Eurostudent countries are quite varied with regard to the extent and types of mobility undertaken.

Muster migrationsspezifischer Unterschiede unter Studienberechtigten in Deutschland. Soziale Herkunft – Schulische Leistungen – Bildungsaspirationen.

Sudheimer, S., & Buchholz, S. (2021).
Muster migrationsspezifischer Unterschiede unter Studienberechtigten in Deutschland. Soziale Herkunft – Schulische Leistungen – Bildungsaspirationen. In M. Jungbauer-Gans & A. Gottburgsen (Hrsg.), Migration, Mobilität und soziale Ungleichheit in der Hochschulbildung (S. 27-58). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31694-5_2

Social Capital and Its Effect on Labour Market (Mis)match: Migrants’ Overqualification in Germany.

Kracke, N., & Klug, C. (2021).
Social Capital and Its Effect on Labour Market (Mis)match: Migrants’ Overqualification in Germany. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 22, 1573-1598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-021-00817-1

What Synthetic Biology Aims At: Review Articles as Sites for Constructing and Narrating an Emerging Field.

Blümel, C. (2021).
What Synthetic Biology Aims At: Review Articles as Sites for Constructing and Narrating an Emerging Field. In K. Kastenhofer & S. Molyneux-Hodgson (Hrsg.), Community and Identity in Contemporary Technosciences (S. 65-84). Cham: Springer Nature (online first).
Abstract

The analysis of scientific communities and collectives are central to STS and the sociology of science. Reviewing practices, that is, practices of ordering, defining or delineating scientific fields can be understood as an often neglected, yet prevailing textual practice of community building, particularly in novel and emerging research fields, such as synthetic biology. In this article, I aim to explore the structure and content of review articles as a dedicated scholarly genre in synthetic biology, focusing on the period between 2002 and 2012.

Selection criteria in professorial recruiting as indicators of institutional similarity? A comparison of German universities and universities of applied sciences.

Kleimann, B., & Hückstädt, M. (2021).
Selection criteria in professorial recruiting as indicators of institutional similarity? A comparison of German universities and universities of applied sciences. Quality in Higher Education (online first). https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2021.1889760

Contact

Anja Gottburgsen
Dr. Anja Gottburgsen +49 511 450670-912