Articles

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Studieren in Deutschland zu Zeiten der Corona-Pandemie. Fachspezifische Besonderheiten des digitalen Studiums.

Lörz, M., Zimmer, L. M., & Marczuk, A. (2021).
Studieren in Deutschland zu Zeiten der Corona-Pandemie. Fachspezifische Besonderheiten des digitalen Studiums. In I. Neiske, J. Osthushenrich, N. Schaper, U. Trier, & N. Vöing (Hrsg.), Hochschule auf Abstand. Ein multiperspektivischer Zugang zur digitalen Lehre (S. 77-88). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag (online first).

The Independence of Research—A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects.

Gläser, J., Ash, M., Buenstorf, G., Hopf, D., Hubenschmid, L., ... & Lieb, K. (2021).
The Independence of Research—A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects. Minerva, 2021 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09451-8

Leistungsfähig und zufrieden? Unbefristete und befristete Postdocs im Vergleich.

Kauhaus, H., Stiegler, A., & Fabian, G. (2021).
Leistungsfähig und zufrieden? Unbefristete und befristete Postdocs im Vergleich. Forschung & Lehre, 2021(09), 736-738.

Informationsportale für eine barrierefreie digitale Lehre.

Oberschelp, A. (2021).
Informationsportale für eine barrierefreie digitale Lehre. Was können deutsche Hochschulen von den USA lernen? Arbeitspapier (61). Berlin: Hochschulforum Digitalisierung.
Abstract

The subject of this study is the analysis of the websites of 20 U.S. universities that contain information and support services to enable accessible, digital teaching. The goal of the analysis is first of all a detailed description of the content of these information portals, which focuses in particular on the aspects of organizational anchoring, addressee orientation, and content design, as well as on identifying good practice. The findings are then discussed with a view to their possible transferability to the German higher education system. If a transfer to the German higher education system makes sense and is possible, corresponding recommendations will be formulated.

Gizasks: What Is the Most Important Scientific Development of the Last 50 Years?

Hesselmann, F. (30. August 2021).
Gizasks: What Is the Most Important Scientific Development of the Last 50 Years [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://gizmodo.com/what-is-the-most-important-scientific-development-of-th-1847518361

Expectations, experiences and anticipated outcomes of supporting refugee students in Germany – a systems theoretical analysis of organizational semantics.

Berg, J. (2021).
Expectations, experiences and anticipated outcomes of supporting refugee students in Germany – a systems theoretical analysis of organizational semantics. In N. Harrison & G. Atherton (Hrsg.), Marginalised Communities in Higher Education - Disadvantage, Mobility and Indigeneity (S. 97-118). London: Routledge.

Informing students about college: Increasing enrollment using a behavioral intervention?

Peter, F., Spieß, C. K., & Zambre, V. (2021).
Informing students about college: Increasing enrollment using a behavioral intervention? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 190, 524-549.

KWReq — a new instrument for measuring knowledge work requirements of higher education graduates.

Trommer, M., Schaeper, H., & Fabian, G. (2021).
KWReq — a new instrument for measuring knowledge work requirements of higher education graduates. Journal for Labour Market Research, 55(20), 1-24 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-021-00303-2
Abstract

Starting from the observation that questionnaires for appropriately measuring the changing working conditions and requirements of the highly qualified workforce do not exist, we developed a new German-language instrument focussing on knowledge work. Based on theoretical considerations, we first identified three basic dimensions that constitute knowledge work: novelty, complexity, and autonomy. During the subsequent process of questionnaire development with higher education graduates, including a cognitive pretest, a quantitative development study, and a replication study, these dimensions were operationalised by initially 173 and finally 22 items.

Überzeugungen und Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen zum inklusiven Unterricht bei (angehenden) Lehrkräften: der Einfluss von Lerngelegenheiten.

Menge, C., Euler, T., & Schaeper, H. (2021).
Überzeugungen und Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen zum inklusiven Unterricht bei (angehenden) Lehrkräften: der Einfluss von Lerngelegenheiten. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24, 1283-1308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01038-z

Der nachschulische Werdegang von Studienberechtigten – Ergebnisse des DZHW-Studienberechtigtenpanels.

Mentges, H., & Quast, H. (2021).
Der nachschulische Werdegang von Studienberechtigten – Ergebnisse des DZHW-Studienberechtigtenpanels. In Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung (Hrsg.), Datenreport zum Berufsbildungsbericht 2021. Informationen und Analysen zur Entwicklung der beruflichen Bildung. (S. 217-223). Leverkusen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.

In-depth analysis of OLAP query performance on heterogeneous hardware.

Broneske, D., Drewes, A., Gurumurthy, B., Hajjar, I., Piontek, T., & Saake, G. (2021).
In-depth analysis of OLAP query performance on heterogeneous hardware. Datenbank-Spektrum, 21, 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13222-021-00384-w

Introduction: Refugees in Higher Education—Questioning the Notion of Integration.

Berg, J., Grüttner, M., & Streitwieser, B. (2021).
Introduction: Refugees in Higher Education—Questioning the Notion of Integration. In J. Berg, M. Grüttner, & B. Streitwieser (Hrsg.), Refugees in Higher Education—Questioning the Notion of Integration (S. 3-17). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Abstract

This edited volume shares the proceedings of a symposium that was as held in the summer of 2019 in Hanover, Germany and dedicated to exploring the notion of integration as it relates to access to higher education for students of refugee background. The symposium included presentations and discussions of access to higher education in Germany, institutional contexts, and the challenges and benefits for students of refugee background compared with other groups. Throughout the symposium, we collaboratively questioned the notion of integration within higher education from different disciplinary, methodological and theoretical perspectives. One special panel also included a group of refugee students discussing their experiences and the main chall

University Applicants from Refugee Backgrounds and the Intention to Drop Out from Pre‐Study Programs: A Mixed‐Methods Study.

Grüttner, M., Schröder, S., & Berg, J. (2021).
University Applicants from Refugee Backgrounds and the Intention to Drop Out from Pre‐Study Programs: A Mixed‐Methods Study. Social Inclusion, 9(3), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i3.4126
Abstract

The mixed‐methods project WeGe investigates key factors for refugees’ integration into pre‐study programs and conditions for successful transitions to higher education institutions (HEIs). In this article, we first examine the dropout intentions of international students and refugee students participating in formal pre‐study programs at German HEIs to disclose both barriers and resources. We use insights from migration research to extend theoretical student dropout models and analyse novel data from a quantitative survey with international and refugee students in pre‐study programs. Our findings show that refugee students intend to drop out from pre‐study programs more often than other international students. This difference disappears when

Bibliometrische Standardberichte für wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen und deren Einsatz an Bibliotheken.

Stahlschmidt, S., Donner, P., & Jahn, N. (2021).
Bibliometrische Standardberichte für wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen und deren Einsatz an Bibliotheken. b.i.t. online, 24(3), 269-276.

Die organisationale Ordnung des Bewertens: eine kommunikationssoziologische Grundlegung.

Kleimann, B. (2021).
Die organisationale Ordnung des Bewertens: eine kommunikationssoziologische Grundlegung. In F. Meier & T. Peetz (Hrsg.), Organisation und Bewertung (S. 71-99). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31549-8

Contact

Anja Gottburgsen
Dr. Anja Gottburgsen +49 511 450670-912