From Open Repositories to CRIS - A Case Study. Schöpfel, J., Azeroual, O., Chaudiron, S., Jacquemin, B., Kergosien, E., Prost, H., & Thiault, F. (2024). From Open Repositories to CRIS - A Case Study. Procedia Computer Science, 2024(249), 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.11.061
|
Bridging the evidence use gap between higher education research and science studies, policy and practice – Notions and functions of intermediaries. Wegner, A. (2024). Bridging the evidence use gap between higher education research and science studies, policy and practice – Notions and functions of intermediaries. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: Zenodo.
|
Bildungsprozesse im Lebensverlauf: Dynamiken im Erwerb von allgemeinbildenden Bildungsabschlüssen. Ordemann, J., & Maaz, K. (2024). Bildungsprozesse im Lebensverlauf: Dynamiken im Erwerb von allgemeinbildenden Bildungsabschlüssen. In G. Quenzel, K. Hurrelmann, J. Groß Ophoff, & C. Weber (Hrsg.), Handbuch Bildungsarmut (S. 1-24). Wiesbaden: Springer.
|
Gender bias in grant allocation shows a decline over time. van den Besselaar, P., Möller, T., Mom, C., Cruz-Castro, L., & Cruz-Castro, L. (2024). Gender bias in grant allocation shows a decline over time. In STI 2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14176637
|
Are there factors that influence the quality of funding acknowledgements in publications? Möller, T., Scheidt, B., & Meier, A. (2024). Are there factors that influence the quality of funding acknowledgements in publications? In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14174157
|
Evidence base of Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines – A bibliometric comparison of Germany and the UK. Aman, V., & Sorgatz, N. (2024). Evidence base of Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines – A bibliometric comparison of Germany and the UK. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14168202
|
Is academic freedom associated with strong science? Lovakov, A. (2024). Is academic freedom associated with strong science? In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14168639
|
Funding decision and applicants' careers. A case study of an early career grant. Möller, T. (2024). Funding decision and applicants' careers. A case study of an early career grant. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14171970
|
Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond. Tcypina, A. (2024). Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14161803
|
Data inaccuracy quantification and uncertainty propagation for bibliometric indicators. Donner, P. (2024). Data inaccuracy quantification and uncertainty propagation for bibliometric indicators. Research Evaluation, 33. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae047
Abstract
This study introduces an approach to estimate the uncertainty in bibliometric indicator values that is caused by data errors. This approach utilizes Bayesian regression models, estimated from empirical data samples, which are used to predict error-free data. Through direct Monte Carlo simulation—drawing many replicates of predicted data from the estimated regression models for the same input data—probability distributions for indicator values can be obtained which provide the information on their uncertainty due to data errors. [...]
|
Evidence use in higher education decision-making and policy: a scoping review of empirical studies from 2010 to 2022. Thiedig, C., & Wegner, A. (2024). Evidence use in higher education decision-making and policy: a scoping review of empirical studies from 2010 to 2022. London Review of Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.22.1.36
|
Die Forschungs- und Arbeitsbedingungen internationaler Wissenschaftler:innen an deutschen Hochschulen. Fabian, G., & Heger, C. (2024). Die Forschungs- und Arbeitsbedingungen internationaler Wissenschaftler:innen an deutschen Hochschulen. In DAAD/DZHW (Hrsg.), Wissenschaft weltoffen. Daten und Fakten zur Internationalität von Studium und Forschung in Deutschland und weltweit. (S. 82-85). Bielefeld: wbv.
|
The research and working conditions of international scientists at German universities. Fabian, G., & Heger, C. (2024). The research and working conditions of international scientists at German universities. In DAAD/DZHW (Hrsg.), Wissenschaft weltoffen 2024. Facts and Figures on the International Nature of Studies and Research in Germany and Worldwide. (S. 82-85). Bielefeld: wbv.
|
Gastbeitrag: Internationale Wissenschaftler/innen auf dem Weg zur Professur an deutschen Universitäten. Jaudzims, S., & Oberschelp, A. (2024). Gastbeitrag: Internationale Wissenschaftler/innen auf dem Weg zur Professur an deutschen Universitäten. Wissenschaft Weltoffen: Daten und Fakten zur Internationalität von Studium und Forschung in Deutschland und weltweit 2024. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst und Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung, 86-87.
|
Assessing bibliodiversity through reference lists: A text analysis approach. Cruz Romero, R., Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2024). Assessing bibliodiversity through reference lists: A text analysis approach. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024) (S. 1-14). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14045592
Abstract
The presence or absence of publishers in large bibliographic databases highlights tangible and symbolic differences between small and large publishers, underlining their diverging incentive structures. To assess these differences, this contribution explores reference data from small (open access) publishers and their journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. The analysis focuses on references that are not indexed in these databases and examines them from a text-as-data approach. The study frames two dimensions of relevance - visibility and impact - as proxies for assessing the scholarly bibliodiversity represented by small (open access) publishers.
|
