Articles

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

The independence of research - a review of disciplinary perspectives and outline of interdisciplinary prospects.

Gläser, J., Ash, M., Bunstorf, G., Hopf, D., Hubenschmid, L., Janßen, M., ... & Lieb, K. (2020).
The independence of research - a review of disciplinary perspectives and outline of interdisciplinary prospects. 1/2020. Berlin: TU Berlin.

Socio-demographics: A global overview of inequalities in education abroad participation.

Netz, N., Klasik, D., Entrich, S., & Barker, M. (2020).
Socio-demographics: A global overview of inequalities in education abroad participation. In A. Ogden, B. Streitwieser, & C. Van Mol (Hrsg.), Education Abroad: Bridging Scholarship and Practice (S. 28-42). New York: Routledge.
Abstract

In recent years, the body of evidence suggesting that studying abroad during higher education can positively influence students’ personality development, academic knowledge and skills, intercultural competences, and employment prospects has increased. Policy makers and scholars alike want to understand who reaps these benefits and who does not. Hence, we review studies examining how key socio-demographic variables (gender, age, socio-economic background, and ethnicity) influence the likelihood of studying abroad.

Assessing the Organizational Climate for Translational Research with a New Survey Tool.

Simons, A., Riedel, N., Toelch, U., Hendriks, B., Ohlraun, S., Liebenau, L., ... & Reinhart, M. (2020).
Assessing the Organizational Climate for Translational Research with a New Survey Tool. Science and Engineering Ethics.

A validation of coauthorship credit models with empirical data from the contributions of PhD candidates.

Donner, P. (2020).
A validation of coauthorship credit models with empirical data from the contributions of PhD candidates. Quantitative Science Studies, 1 (2), 551-564.
Abstract

A perennial problem in bibliometrics is the appropriate distribution of authorship credit for coauthored publications. Several credit allocation methods and formulas have been introduced, but there has been little empirical validation as to which method best reflects the typical contributions of coauthors. This paper presents a validation of credit allocation methods using a new data set of author-provided percentage contribution figures obtained from the coauthored publications in cumulative PhD theses by authors from three countries that contain contribution statements. [...]

Forschung zum wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchs in Deutschland: Implikationen für hochschulisches Qualitätsmanagement.

Schwabe, U., & Jungbauer-Gans, M. (2020).
Forschung zum wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchs in Deutschland: Implikationen für hochschulisches Qualitätsmanagement. In M. Fuhrmann, J. Güdler, J. Kohler, P. Pohlenz & U. Schmidt (Hrsg.), Handbuch Qualität in Studium, Lehre und Forschung (C2.21). Berlin.

Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups.

Akbaritabar, A., Traag, V.A., Caimo, A., & Squazzoni, F. (2020).
Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups. Scientometrics. [online first]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03555-w

Studienfinanzierung und studienbegleitende Erwerbstätigkeit als Determinanten des studentischen Workloads: Negative Effekte der Selbstfinanzierung?

Apolinarski, B., & Gwosć, C. (2020).
Studienfinanzierung und studienbegleitende Erwerbstätigkeit als Determinanten des studentischen Workloads: Negative Effekte der Selbstfinanzierung? In D. Großmann, C. Engel, J. Junkermann, & T. Wolbring (Hrsg.), Studentischer Workload. Definition, Messung und Einflüsse (S. 119-143). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Sichtbarkeit und Bewertung.

Krüger, A., & Hesselmann, F. (2020).
Sichtbarkeit und Bewertung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 49(2-3), 163-181. doi: 10.1515/zfsoz-2020-0015.

Formulierungshilfen für Forschungsdatenzentren zum Thema Nutzungsbedingungen.

Pegelow, L., Neuendorf, C., Daniel, A., & Buck, D. (2020).
Formulierungshilfen für Forschungsdatenzentren zum Thema Nutzungsbedingungen. Berlin; RatSWD Working Paper Series 271. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.53

Students’ time budget in European comparative perspective. Results of the 6th round of EUROSTUDENT and an in-depth analysis of the Hungarian student survey.

Vögtle, E. M., & Hámori, Á. (2020).
Students’ time budget in European comparative perspective. Results of the 6th round of EUROSTUDENT and an in-depth analysis of the Hungarian student survey. In D. Großmann, C. Engel, J. Junkermann & T. Wolbring (Hrsg.), Studentischer Workload. Definition, Messung und Einflüsse (S. 145-177). Wiesbaden; Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28931-7
Abstract

This contribution investigates students’ time budget across 28 European Higher Education Area member countries from a (descriptive) comparative perspective and it provides an in-depth analysis for Hungarian students. Whether students spend more time in direct interaction with teaching staff, or studying on their own, reflects the varying requirements set by different types of higher education institutions, fields of study, and study programmes. Additionally, time investments vary among different groups of students

Gender patterns of publication in top sociological journals.

Akbaritabar, A., & Squazzoni, F. (2020).
Gender patterns of publication in top sociological journals. Science, Technology, & Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0162243920941588

Prejudices against the unemployed - empirical evidence from Germany.

Gross, C., Gurr, T., Jungbauer-Gans, M., & Lang, S. (2020).
Prejudices against the unemployed - empirical evidence from Germany. Journal for Labour Market Research, 54(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-020-00268-8
Abstract

Prejudices against the unemployed pose an enormous threat to their self-confidence and can make it difficult for them to re-enter the labour market, resulting in further long-term unemployment. Given these high costs for the unemployed and for society as a whole, our knowledge of prejudices against the unemployed is surprisingly scarce. We focus on the question of what determines the strength of prejudice among employees. By applying social identity theory, we assume that people who are disadvantaged in the labour market in general, also hold stronger prejudices. In addition, we assume that social status mediates this association and that self-efficacy moderates it.

Data Wrangling in Database Systems: Purging of Dirty Data.

Azeroual, O. (2020).
Data Wrangling in Database Systems: Purging of Dirty Data. Data, 6/2020, 50. Basel: MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5020050

Warum wählen Männer und Frauen unterschiedliche Studienfächer?

Hägglund, A. E., & Lörz, M. (2020).
Warum wählen Männer und Frauen unterschiedliche Studienfächer? Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 49(1), 66-86. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2020-0005

Prevenir el alcoholismo desde los colegios: Componentes y evidencia de programas de prevención/School-based prevention of alcoholism: Components and evidence of effective programs.

Pineda, P., Celis, J., & Rangel, L. (2020).
Prevenir el alcoholismo desde los colegios: Componentes y evidencia de programas de prevención/School-based prevention of alcoholism: Components and evidence of effective programs. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 16(1), 138-162. https://doi.org/10.17151/rlee.2020.16.1.7
Abstract

Policy instruments such as the National Policy for Reducing Substance Use (Ministerio de Protección Social, 2007) and the National Law on School Coexistence (CRC, 2013) follow a preventive approach to address the problem of alcoholism. However, neither national public bodies nor schools often have access to information on prevention programs based on scientific evidence. In this article, the international literature on alcohol abuse prevention programs in the school setting is reviewed. It was found that the most robust programs are characterized by (1) differentiating between abuse and use, (2) addressing the problem of addiction to different psychoactive substances, (3) relating alcohol to overall social-emotional problems.

Contact

Anja Gottburgsen
Dr. Anja Gottburgsen +49 511 450670-912