Publications

DZHW publishes its research findings in renowned academic journals, at national and international conferences and in its own publishing formats. An overview of publications and lectures produced by DZHW staff can be seen below. You can open individual publication formats separately using the menu in the left-hand column.

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Arbeitsmarkterträge eines Studiums für beruflich Qualifizierte. Hochschulabsolvent*innen mit und ohne vorakademische Ausbildung im Vergleich.

Dahm, G. (2024).
Arbeitsmarkterträge eines Studiums für beruflich Qualifizierte. Hochschulabsolvent*innen mit und ohne vorakademische Ausbildung im Vergleich. Working Paper Forschungsförderung (325). Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.

Creating Interpretative Spaces in and with Digital Infrastructures: How Editors Select Reviewers at a Biomedical Publisher.

Hesselmann, F., & Hartstein, J. (2024).
Creating Interpretative Spaces in and with Digital Infrastructures: How Editors Select Reviewers at a Biomedical Publisher. Science, Technology, & Human Values. Online Version, https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439241257720 (Abgerufen am: 05.06.2024) (online first). https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439241257720

Responsible Research Assessment and Research Information Management Systems.

Schöpfel, J., & Azeroual, O. (2024).
Responsible Research Assessment and Research Information Management Systems. Encyclopedia, 2024(4), 915-922.

Informationsveranstaltung zum KDSF-Standard für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland.

Geschäftsstelle der KFiD (2024).
Workshop Informationsveranstaltung zum KDSF-Standard für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland.

The level and development of university students’ social integration: personality traits and person-environment fit predict integration with fellow students and teaching staff.

Jusri, R., & Lechner, C. (2024).
The level and development of university students’ social integration: personality traits and person-environment fit predict integration with fellow students and teaching staff. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01240-y

Does gender composition in a field of study matter? Gender disparities in college students’ academic self-concepts.

Fiedler, I., Buchholz, S., & Schaeper, H. (2024).
Does gender composition in a field of study matter? Gender disparities in college students’ academic self-concepts. Research in Higher Education (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-024-09794-7

Digitalisation of teaching, learning, and student life.

Schirmer, H. (2024).
Digitalisation of teaching, learning, and student life. EUROSTUDENT 8 Topical module report. Tallinn: Praxis think tank.
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the digitalisation of higher education, presenting both opportunities and challenges. It acted as a universal catalyst for digitalization. This (forced) boost of digitalisation creates both: Possibilities for increased inclusion of underrepresented student groups in higher education on the one hand, and challenges with regards to an inflexible overreliance on digital formats for other student groups on the other hand. This report examines the interplay between institutional services, student needs, and study modes, aiming to understand their impact on satisfaction and success in higher education.

Does instructional time at school influence study time at university? Evidence from an instructional time reform.

Schwerter, J., Netz, N., & Hübner, N. (2024).
Does instructional time at school influence study time at university? Evidence from an instructional time reform. Economics of Education Review, 100, 102526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102526
Abstract

Early-life environments can have long-lasting effects on individuals’ later life courses. Interestingly, research on the effects of school reforms has hardly adopted this perspective. Therefore, we investigate a staggered school reform that reduced the number of school years and increased weekly instructional time for secondary school students in most German federal states. We analyze this quasi-experiment in a difference-in-differences framework using nationally representative large-scale survey data on 69,513 students who attended university between 1998 and 2016. Using both TWFE and weighted-group ATT estimators, we find negative effects of reform exposure on hours spent attending classes and on self-study.

Das Nacaps-Datenportal – Potenziale, Besonderheiten und Datenqualität in interaktiven digitalen Reportings.

Azeroual, O. (2024).
Das Nacaps-Datenportal – Potenziale, Besonderheiten und Datenqualität in interaktiven digitalen Reportings. Information – Wissenschaft & Praxis, 2024(75), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2024-2005

On the performativity of SDG classifications in large bibliometric databases.

Ottaviani, M., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2024).
On the performativity of SDG classifications in large bibliometric databases. ArXiv (online first). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.03007
Abstract

This work proposes using the feature of large language models (LLMs) to learn about the "data bias" injected by diverse SDG classifications into bibliometric data by exploring five SDGs. We build a LLM that is fine-tuned in parallel by the diverse SDG classifications inscribed into the databases' SDG classifications. Our results show high sensitivity in model architecture, classified publications, fine-tuning process and natural language generation. The wide arbitrariness at different levels raises concerns about using LLM in research practice.

How A/B testing changes the dynamics of information spreading on a social network.

Ottaviani, M., Herzog, S., Nickl, P. L., & Lorenz-Spreen, P. (2024).
How A/B testing changes the dynamics of information spreading on a social network. ArXiv (online first). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.01165

Nacaps 2018.

Briedis, K., Lietz, A., Ruß, U., Schwabe, U., Seifert, M., ... & Hoffstätter, U. (2024).
Nacaps 2018. Daten- und Methodenbericht zur National Academics Panel Study 2018 (1.-4. Befragungswelle – Promovierende). Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:nac2018:2.0.0
Abstract

Nacaps, the National Academics Panel Study, is a new longitudinal study of doctoral candidates and doctorate holders in Germany funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). The project aims at providing nationwide cross-sectional and longitudinal data on doctoral candidates and doctorate holders in Germany regarding their study conditions as well as their career trajectories within and outside of academia. The Nacaps study series apply a panel design to multiple cohorts. Nacaps 2018 is the first cohort in this series of studies. In 2019, all doctoral candidates registered at 53 higher education institutions [...] Full Abstract: https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:nac2018:2.0.0

Heterogene Studierendenschaft. Sozialstruktur und Studiensituation der Studierenden in Deutschland.

Kerst, C., Kroher, M., & Steinkühler, J. (2024).
Heterogene Studierendenschaft. Sozialstruktur und Studiensituation der Studierenden in Deutschland. Forschung und Lehre, 31(5), 362-363.

Contrasting cross-correlation: Meta-analyses of the associations between citations and 13 altmetrics, incorporating moderating variables.

Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2024).
Contrasting cross-correlation: Meta-analyses of the associations between citations and 13 altmetrics, incorporating moderating variables. Scientometrics (online first).

Bildung und sozialer Zusammenhalt. „Aktionsrat Bildung. (2024). vbw – Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft“.

Anders, Y., Hannover, B., Jungbauer-Gans, M., Lenzen, D., McElvany, N., ... & Wößmann, L. (2024).
Bildung und sozialer Zusammenhalt. „Aktionsrat Bildung. (2024). vbw – Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft“.: Waxmann Verlag (ISBN: 978-3-8309-4870-4).

Contact

Anja Gottburgsen
Dr. Anja Gottburgsen +49 511 450670-912