Review and definition of the term "mobility window".
Ferencz, I., Kupriyanova, V., Netz, N., & Hauschildt, K. (2013).
Review and definition of the term "mobility window".
In I. Ferencz, K. Hauschildt & I. Garam (Eds.), ACA papers on international cooperation in education. Mobility windows: From concept to practice (pp. 29–36). Bonn, Germany: Lemmens.
|
Setting up mobility windows.
Garam, I., Kupriyanova, V., Ferencz, I., Lam, Q., & Hauschildt, K. (2013).
Setting up mobility windows.
In I. Ferencz, K. Hauschildt & I. Garam (Eds.), ACA papers on international cooperation in education. Mobility windows: From concept to practice (pp. 52–79). Bonn, germany: Lemmens.
|
Organising and supporting window mobility.
Schirmer, H., & Hauschildt, K. (2013).
Organising and supporting window mobility.
In I. Ferencz, K. Hauschildt & I. Garam (Eds.), ACA papers on international cooperation in education. Mobility windows: From concept to practice (pp. 88–99). Bonn, Germany: Lemmens.
|
The evaluation stage.
Hauschildt, K. (2013).
The evaluation stage.
In I. Ferencz, K. Hauschildt & I. Garam (Eds.), ACA papers on international cooperation in education. Mobility windows: From concept to practice (pp. 100–102). Bonn, Germany: Lemmens.
|
Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100).
Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., & Wang, J. (2013).
Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100).
Journal of Informetrics, 7/4, 933-944.
|
Jugend und Studium.
Kerst, C., & Wolter, A. (2013).
Jugend und Studium.
In Y. Kaiser, M. Spenn, M. Freitag, T. Rauschenbach & M. Corsa (Hrsg.), Handbuch Jugend. Evangelische Perspektiven (S. 207-212). Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
|
Bibliometric Evaluation Standards Debate.
Sirtes, D., & Waltman, L. (2013).
Bibliometric Evaluation Standards Debate.
In Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, (S. 373-377). Berlin: iFQ.
|
The characteristics of highly cited non-source items in political science.
Chi, P.-S. (2013).
The characteristics of highly cited non-source items in political science.
In S. Hinze & A. Lottmann (Hrsg.), Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Berlin: iFQ.
|
Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators.
Hinze, S., & Lottmann, A. (Hrsg.) (2013).
Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators.
Berlin: iFQ.
|
Collaboration Benefits and International Visibility of Two-Country-Collaborations.
Riechert, M., Sirtes, D., & Lietz, H. (2013).
Collaboration Benefits and International Visibility of Two-Country-Collaborations.
In S. Hinze & A. Lottmann (Hrsg.), Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, (S. 303-312). Berlin: iFQ.
|
The Best Five - Do Authors' Assessments of their own Publications Correspond to Metric Based Rankings?
Schmidt, M., & Neufeld, J. (2013).
The Best Five - Do Authors' Assessments of their own Publications Correspond to Metric Based Rankings?
In Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor. Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin, 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, (S. 335-342). Berlin: iFQ.
|
Ausstattungs-, Kosten- und Leistungsvergleich Künstlerische Hochschulen 2011. Kennzahlenergebnisse für die Länder Berlin, Bremen, Hamburg, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Sachsen-Anhalt und Schleswig-Holstein auf Basis des Jahres 2011.
Dölle, F., Deuse, C., Jenkner, P., Oberschelp, A., Pommrenke, S., Sanders, S., & Winkelmann, G. (2013).
Ausstattungs-, Kosten- und Leistungsvergleich Künstlerische Hochschulen 2011. Kennzahlenergebnisse für die Länder Berlin, Bremen, Hamburg, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Sachsen-Anhalt und Schleswig-Holstein auf Basis des Jahres 2011.
(HIS:Forum Hochschule 12/2013). Hannover: HIS.
ISBN 978-3-86426-034-6
|
Bildung und Qualifikation als Grundlage der technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands.
Leszczensky, M., Cordes, A., Kerst, C., Meister, T., & Wespel, J. (2013).
Bildung und Qualifikation als Grundlage der technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands.
Bericht des Konsortiums "Bildungsindikatoren und technologische Leistungsfähigkeit" (HIS:Forum Hochschule 11/2013). Hannover: HIS.
ISBN 978-3-86426-033-9
|
Bildung.
Seeber, S., Wolter, A., Döbert, H., Kerst, C., Becker-Stoll, F., & Seitz, C. (2013).
Bildung.
In J. Rump & N. Walter (Hrsg.), Arbeitswelt 2030. Trends, Prognosen, Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten, (S. 93-122). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
|
Peer review-based selection decisions in individual research funding, applicants publication strategies and performance: The case of the ERC Starting Grants.
Neufeld, J., Huber, N., & Wegner, A. (2013).
Peer review-based selection decisions in individual research funding, applicants publication strategies and performance: The case of the ERC Starting Grants.
Research Evaluation, Vol. 22, No. 3, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt014
|
