Publications

DZHW publishes its research findings in renowned academic journals, at national and international conferences and in its own publishing formats. An overview of publications and lectures produced by DZHW staff can be seen below. You can open individual publication formats separately using the menu in the left-hand column.

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Egocentric attribution bias in formal co-author contribution statements and bibliometric counting method validity.

Donner, P. (2025).
Egocentric attribution bias in formal co-author contribution statements and bibliometric counting method validity. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.

Are citation context information stronger related to peer ratings than citation counts? A descriptive analysis.

Donner, P., Stahlschmidt, S., Haunschild, R., & Bornmann, L. (2025).
Are citation context information stronger related to peer ratings than citation counts? A descriptive analysis. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 325-332). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
Abstract

In this study, we investigated whether citation context information is able to increase the validity of citation impact analyses to measure research quality compared to simple citation counts. We analyzed the statistical relationships of information extracted from structured citation context data in the Web of Science (Clarivate) such as the placement of citations within specific sections of an article with post-publication peer review quality ratings from Faculty Opinions (H1 connect), used as an external validity criterion for research quality. The study is based on publications in medicine and life sciences. [...]

Digitalisierung der Juristischen Ausbildung.

Eisentraut, N. (2025).
Digitalisierung der Juristischen Ausbildung. In J. Eichelberger & R. Schwarze (Hrsg.), Festschrift 50 Jahre Juristische Fakultät der Leibniz Universität Hannover. Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748949893-531

Projekt NuDHe: Bedingungskonstellationen für die Nutzung befragungs- und prozessbasierter Daten in der Hochschulentwicklung.

Wegner, A., & Janson, K. (2025).
Projekt NuDHe: Bedingungskonstellationen für die Nutzung befragungs- und prozessbasierter Daten in der Hochschulentwicklung. In A. Eickelmann, J. Henke, B. Krieger, U. Schmoch, J. Spanjol, & F. Witzigmann (Hrsg.), Erfolgreiche Gestaltung von Wissenstransfer an Hochschulen. Ein Leitfaden für Hochschulleitungen und Wissenschaftsministerien (S. 51-57). Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.

SurveyBot: A new era of web survey pretesting.

Shahania, S., Spiliopoulou, M., & Broneske, D. (2025).
SurveyBot: A new era of web survey pretesting. In I. Maglogiannis, L. Iliadis, A. Andreou, & A. Papaleonidas (Hrsg.), Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations. AIAI 2025. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-96235-6_29

Ageism in German Universities: Challenges Faced by Older Students.

Gerdes, F., Naegele, L., Ordemann, J., & Hess, M. (2025).
Ageism in German Universities: Challenges Faced by Older Students. Educational Gerontology. Taylor & Francis Online , https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2025.2522392 (Abgerufen am: 23.06.2025) (online first). https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2025.2522392
Abstract

Ageism in universities—meaning unequal treatment based on (older) age—is rarely addressed in higher education research. Yet with increasingly age-diverse student populations, older students may face discrimination for defying chrononormative expectations. Using data from the 2021 German Student Survey (N = 4,811; 300 students aged 30+), this research note identifies six forms of ageism. Logistic regression shows older students more often feel excluded or disregarded, but less often report unwelcome sexual remarks. Findings point to the need for policy action and greater scholarly attention to ageism in higher education.

The impact of Russia-Ukraine conflict on international migration of Russian‐affiliated researchers.

Lovakov, A. (2025).
The impact of Russia-Ukraine conflict on international migration of Russian‐affiliated researchers. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (Bd. 2025(2), S. 1730-1738). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.

Guidance List for Reporting Bibliometric Analyses (GLOBAL): A two-round modified Delphi study.

Ng, J. Y., Liu, H., Masood, M., Syed, N., Waltman, L., ... & Moher, D. (2025).
Guidance List for Reporting Bibliometric Analyses (GLOBAL): A two-round modified Delphi study. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 868-884). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.

Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research: What can reviewers' comments tell us about reporting completeness?

Stephen, D., Schniedermann, A., Lovakov, A., Schmidt, M., Ottaviani, M., ... & Stahlschmidt, S. (2025).
Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research: What can reviewers' comments tell us about reporting completeness? In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (Bd. 2025, S. 2199-2206). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. https://doi.org/10.51408/issi2025_132

A decision model for it-supported research management based on cutting-edge data science technologies.

Azeroual, O., & Störl, U. (2025).
A decision model for it-supported research management based on cutting-edge data science technologies. In C. S. Londhe, N. S. Bhatt, & N. Kitsing (Hrsg.), Information systems for intelligent systems. ISBM 2024. Smart innovation, systems and technologies (S. 315-330). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1206-2_25

Towards automatic bias analysis in multimedia journalism.

Hinrichs, R., Steffen, H., Avetisyan, H., Broneske, D., & Ostermann, J. (2025).
Towards automatic bias analysis in multimedia journalism. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00362-1

Bibliometrics and altmetrics in the context of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine.

Ng, J. Y., Stephen, D., Liu, J., Ostermann, T., Robinson, N., & Cramer, H. (2025).
Bibliometrics and altmetrics in the context of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine. Integrative Medicine Research, 14(3), 101181 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2025.101181

Application Barriers and the Socioeconomic Gap in Child Care Enrollment.

Hermes, H., Lergetporer, P., Peter, F., & Wiederhold, S. (2025).
Application Barriers and the Socioeconomic Gap in Child Care Enrollment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 23(3), 1133-1172. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvae054
Abstract

Why are children with lower socioeconomic status (SES) substantially less likely to be enrolled in child care? We study whether barriers in the application process work against lower-SES children — the group known to benefit strongest from child care enrollment. In an RCT in Germany with highly subsidized child care (N = 607), we offer treated families information and personal assistance for applications. We find substantial, equity-enhancing effects of the treatment, closing half of the large SES gap in child care enrollment. Increased enrollment for lower-SES families is likely driven by altered application knowledge and behavior. We discuss scalability of our intervention and derive policy implications for the design of universal child..

Qualifizierungsmerkmale von Habilitation und Tenure-Track Juniorprofessur im Vergleich.

Luksche, C., & Köker, P. (2025).
Qualifizierungsmerkmale von Habilitation und Tenure-Track Juniorprofessur im Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 20(2), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.21240/zfhe/20-2/03
Abstract

The German academic system faces the challenge of reconciling traditional and mod-ern qualification paths to a professorship. The historically established habilitation and the newly introduced tenure-track junior professorship play a central role in the academic career system but differ significantly in structure and requirements. This article contrasts the two career paths and highlights the factors that restrict their com-parability. The findings highlight the need for a review and harmonization of the existing regulations.

Education bias in probability-based surveys in Germany: evidence and possible solutions.

Stein, A., Gummer, T., Naumann, E., Rohr, B., Silber, H., ... & Weiß, B. (2025).
Education bias in probability-based surveys in Germany: evidence and possible solutions. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2025.2508889, (Abgerufen am: 18.06.2025).
Abstract

This paper outlines two studies on education bias in German probability-based surveys. Study 1 reviews data from 67 surveys across 19 survey programs conducted in Germany from 2000 to 2023. We found a consistent underrepresentation of individuals with a low level of formal education. We also found that the transition to self-administered modes due to rising survey costs may exacerbate this bias in the future. In study 2, we use the results of a workshop with experts on probability-based surveys, to discuss various strategies to deal with this bias, including increased face-to-face contacts and incentives, while emphasizing the need for research on adapting survey designs.

Contact

Anja Gottburgsen
Dr. Anja Gottburgsen +49 511 450670-912