Publications

DZHW publishes its research findings in renowned academic journals, at national and international conferences and in its own publishing formats. An overview of publications and lectures produced by DZHW staff can be seen below. You can open individual publication formats separately using the menu in the left-hand column.

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Are there factors that influence the quality of funding acknowledgements in publications?

Möller, T., Scheidt, B., & Meier, A. (2024).
Are there factors that influence the quality of funding acknowledgements in publications? In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14174157

Evidence base of Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines – A bibliometric comparison of Germany and the UK.

Aman, V., & Sorgatz, N. (2024).
Evidence base of Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines – A bibliometric comparison of Germany and the UK. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14168202

Is academic freedom associated with strong science?

Lovakov, A. (2024).
Is academic freedom associated with strong science? In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14168639

Funding decision and applicants' careers. A case study of an early career grant.

Möller, T. (2024).
Funding decision and applicants' careers. A case study of an early career grant. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14171970

Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond.

Tcypina, A. (2024).
Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14161803

Ausstattungs‐, Kosten‐ und Leistungsvergleich Künstlerische Hochschulen 2023. Grunddaten und Kennzahlen der Universität der Künste Berlin.

Winkelmann, G. (2024).
Ausstattungs‐, Kosten‐ und Leistungsvergleich Künstlerische Hochschulen 2023. Grunddaten und Kennzahlen der Universität der Künste Berlin. Hannover: DZHW (nicht zur Veröffentlichung vorgesehen).

Ergebnisse der Trendumfrage Forschungsdateninfrastrukturen 2024.

Hartstein, J., & Blümel, C. (2024).
Ergebnisse der Trendumfrage Forschungsdateninfrastrukturen 2024. Hannover: Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14093010

Ausstattungs‐, Kosten‐ und Leistungsvergleich Fachhochschulen 2023. Grunddaten und Kennzahlen der Hochschule Neubrandenburg.

Winkelmann, G. (2024).
Ausstattungs‐, Kosten‐ und Leistungsvergleich Fachhochschulen 2023. Grunddaten und Kennzahlen der Hochschule Neubrandenburg. Hannover: DZHW (nicht zur Veröffentlichung vorgesehen).

Data inaccuracy quantification and uncertainty propagation for bibliometric indicators.

Donner, P. (2024).
Data inaccuracy quantification and uncertainty propagation for bibliometric indicators. Research Evaluation, 33. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae047
Abstract

This study introduces an approach to estimate the uncertainty in bibliometric indicator values that is caused by data errors. This approach utilizes Bayesian regression models, estimated from empirical data samples, which are used to predict error-free data. Through direct Monte Carlo simulation—drawing many replicates of predicted data from the estimated regression models for the same input data—probability distributions for indicator values can be obtained which provide the information on their uncertainty due to data errors. [...]

Evidence use in higher education decision-making and policy: a scoping review of empirical studies from 2010 to 2022.

Thiedig, C., & Wegner, A. (2024).
Evidence use in higher education decision-making and policy: a scoping review of empirical studies from 2010 to 2022. London Review of Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.22.1.36

Die Forschungs- und Arbeitsbedingungen internationaler Wissenschaftler:innen an deutschen Hochschulen.

Fabian, G., & Heger, C. (2024).
Die Forschungs- und Arbeitsbedingungen internationaler Wissenschaftler:innen an deutschen Hochschulen. In DAAD/DZHW (Hrsg.), Wissenschaft weltoffen. Daten und Fakten zur Internationalität von Studium und Forschung in Deutschland und weltweit. (S. 82-85). Bielefeld: wbv.

The research and working conditions of international scientists at German universities.

Fabian, G., & Heger, C. (2024).
The research and working conditions of international scientists at German universities. In DAAD/DZHW (Hrsg.), Wissenschaft weltoffen 2024. Facts and Figures on the International Nature of Studies and Research in Germany and Worldwide. (S. 82-85). Bielefeld: wbv.

Gastbeitrag: Internationale Wissenschaftler/innen auf dem Weg zur Professur an deutschen Universitäten.

Jaudzims, S., & Oberschelp, A. (2024).
Gastbeitrag: Internationale Wissenschaftler/innen auf dem Weg zur Professur an deutschen Universitäten. Wissenschaft Weltoffen: Daten und Fakten zur Internationalität von Studium und Forschung in Deutschland und weltweit 2024. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst und Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung, 86-87.

Assessing bibliodiversity through reference lists: A text analysis approach.

Cruz Romero, R., Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2024).
Assessing bibliodiversity through reference lists: A text analysis approach. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024) (S. 1-14). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14045592
Abstract

The presence or absence of publishers in large bibliographic databases highlights tangible and symbolic differences between small and large publishers, underlining their diverging incentive structures. To assess these differences, this contribution explores reference data from small (open access) publishers and their journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. The analysis focuses on references that are not indexed in these databases and examines them from a text-as-data approach. The study frames two dimensions of relevance - visibility and impact - as proxies for assessing the scholarly bibliodiversity represented by small (open access) publishers.

DZHW-Wissenschaftsbefragung 2023. Daten- und Methodenbericht zur DZHW-Wissenschaftsbefragung 2023.

Fabian, G., Heger, C., Just, A., & Weber, A. (2024).
DZHW-Wissenschaftsbefragung 2023. Daten- und Methodenbericht zur DZHW-Wissenschaftsbefragung 2023. Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:scs2023-dmr:1.0.0
Abstract

The DZHW Scientists Survey 2023 is an online survey of full-time academic and artistic staff at German universities and equivalent institutions of higher education with the right to award doctorates. It is repeated at regular intervals as a trend study to explore the working and research conditions at German universities and equivalent institutions of higher education. The DZHW Scientists Survey 2023 was conducted from January to March 2023. The respondents therefore take a retrospective look at their working and research conditions during the Covid-19 pandemic and their current post-pandemic situation. The previous Scientists Surveys took place in 2010, 2016 and 2019/2020. [...] Full Abstract: https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:scs2023:1.0.0

Contact

Anja Gottburgsen
Dr. Anja Gottburgsen +49 511 450670-912