Electromobility Research in Germany and China: Structural Differences.
Qu, Z. (2018).
Electromobility Research in Germany and China: Structural Differences.
Scientometrics, 117(1), 473-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2873-9
|
Open Science - a loosely coupled discourse? Results from scientometric analysis In STI 2018 Conference Proceedings.
Blümel, C., & Beng, F. (2018).
Open Science - a loosely coupled discourse? Results from scientometric analysis In STI 2018 Conference Proceedings.
In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (S. 369-377). Leiden, The Netherlands.
|
Quantitative User Valuation Studies - The case of Altmetrics.
Gauch, S., & Blümel, C. (2018).
Quantitative User Valuation Studies - The case of Altmetrics.
In Conference Proceedings. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (S. 255-266). Leiden, The Netherlands.
|
Bildungswege, Diversität und Studienziele beruflich qualifizierter Studierender.
Kerst, C., & Wolter, A (2018).
Bildungswege, Diversität und Studienziele beruflich qualifizierter Studierender.
berufsbildung, 72(172), 26-29.
|
Die Situation von Geflüchteten auf dem Weg ins Studium.
Grüttner, M., Schröder, S., Berg, J., Otto, C. (2018).
Die Situation von Geflüchteten auf dem Weg ins Studium.
(DZHW Brief 5|2018). Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.34878/2018.05.dzhw_brief
|
Zwischen Befähigung und Stigmatisierung? Die Situation von Geflüchteten beim Hochschulzugang und im Studium. Ein internationaler Forschungsüberblick.
Berg, J., Grüttner, M., & Schröder, S. (2018).
Zwischen Befähigung und Stigmatisierung? Die Situation von Geflüchteten beim Hochschulzugang und im Studium. Ein internationaler Forschungsüberblick.
Z'Flucht - Zeitschrift für Flüchtlingsforschung, 2 (1), 57-90. https://doi.org/10.5771/2509-9485-2018-1-57
|
Datenprofiling und Datenbereinigung in Forschungsinformationssystemen.
Azeroual, O., / Abuosba, M. (2018).
Datenprofiling und Datenbereinigung in Forschungsinformationssystemen.
In HTW Berlin & M. Knaut (Hrsg.), Kreativität + X = Innovation, 8/2018, S.16-25. Berlin: BWV - Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag GmbH.
|
Nachwuchssorgen - alles eine Frage der Vereinbarkeit?
Banavas, T., Oppermann, A., & Lange, J. (2018).
Nachwuchssorgen - alles eine Frage der Vereinbarkeit?
news - GENDER | POLITIK | UNIVERSITÄT. Fehler im System. Warum es so wenige Frauen in der Wissenschaft gibt, 1/2018. Koordinationsbüro für Frauenförderung und Gleichstellung, Technische Universität Berlin, 26-29.
|
Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Berlin 2016. Regionalauswertung der 21. Sozialerhebung durchgeführt vom DZHW für das studierendenWERK BERLIN.
Schirmer, H. (2018).
Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Berlin 2016. Regionalauswertung der 21. Sozialerhebung durchgeführt vom DZHW für das studierendenWERK BERLIN.
Berlin: studierendenWERK BERLIN.
|
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Main report.
Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Main report.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/048735
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?
|
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Executive summary.
Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Executive summary.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/459056
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?
|
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 1, Country case studies.
Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 1, Country case studies.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/409116
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?
|
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 2, Literature study and indicator review.
Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 2, Literature study and indicator review.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/884
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?
|
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 3, Country fiches.
Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 3, Country fiches.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/952691
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?
|
A new bibliometric approach to measure knowledge transfer of internationally mobile scientists.
Aman, V. (2018).
A new bibliometric approach to measure knowledge transfer of internationally mobile scientists.
Scientometrics, Volume 117, Issue 1, 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2864-x
Abstract
This study introduces a new bibliometric approach to study the effects of international scientific mobility on knowledge transfer. It is based on an analysis of internationally mobile and non-internationally mobile German scientists publishing in journals that are indexed in Scopus. Using bibliometric data such co-authored articles, references and lexical abstract terms from the Scopus database, a method is presented that is based on cosine similarity to measure the similarity of the knowledge base of authors and their co-authors. This quantifiable method is capable of revealing potential knowledge transfer between internationally mobile scientists and different types of co-authors.
|
