Qualifizierungsmerkmale von Habilitation und Tenure-Track Juniorprofessur im Vergleich. Luksche, C., & Köker, P. (2025). Qualifizierungsmerkmale von Habilitation und Tenure-Track Juniorprofessur im Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 20(2), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.21240/zfhe/20-2/03
Abstract
The German academic system faces the challenge of reconciling traditional and mod-ern qualification paths to a professorship. The historically established habilitation and the newly introduced tenure-track junior professorship play a central role in the academic career system but differ significantly in structure and requirements. This article contrasts the two career paths and highlights the factors that restrict their com-parability. The findings highlight the need for a review and harmonization of the existing regulations.
|
Education bias in probability-based surveys in Germany: evidence and possible solutions. Stein, A., Gummer, T., Naumann, E., Rohr, B., Silber, H., ... & Weiß, B. (2025). Education bias in probability-based surveys in Germany: evidence and possible solutions. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2025.2508889, (Abgerufen am: 18.06.2025).
Abstract
This paper outlines two studies on education bias in German probability-based surveys. Study 1 reviews data from 67 surveys across 19 survey programs conducted in Germany from 2000 to 2023. We found a consistent underrepresentation of individuals with a low level of formal education. We also found that the transition to self-administered modes due to rising survey costs may exacerbate this bias in the future. In study 2, we use the results of a workshop with experts on probability-based surveys, to discuss various strategies to deal with this bias, including increased face-to-face contacts and incentives, while emphasizing the need for research on adapting survey designs.
|
|
|
Erfassung der sozialen Herkunft in Large-Scale Assessments zum Bildungsmonitoring: Indikatoren und ihre Aussagekraft. Niemietz, J., & Schipolowski, S. (2025). Erfassung der sozialen Herkunft in Large-Scale Assessments zum Bildungsmonitoring: Indikatoren und ihre Aussagekraft. In T. Drope, S. Reh, & K. Maaz (Hrsg.), Bildungsungleichheit als Gegenstand der Bildungsforschung: Perspektiven, Erträge und Aussichten (S. 177-198). Münster: Waxmann.
|
Platformization of Scholarly Communication: Academic Social Networking Sites as New Infrastructures and Organizations. Köchling, S. (2025). Platformization of Scholarly Communication: Academic Social Networking Sites as New Infrastructures and Organizations. Emerging Media: Technology, Industry and Society. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/27523543251346565 (Abgerufen am: 02.06.2025) (online first). https://www.doi.org/10.1177/27523543251346565
|
Embracing NVM: Optimizing $B^𝜖$-tree structures and data compression in storage engines. Karim, S., Wünsche, F., Broneske, D., Kuhn, M., & Saake, G. (2025). Embracing NVM: Optimizing $B^𝜖$-tree structures and data compression in storage engines. In Binnig, C. et al. (Hrsg.), Datenbanksysteme für Business, Technologie und Web - Workshopband (BTW 2025) (S. 329-333). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik. https://doi.org/10.18420/BTW2025-137
|
Erste unter Gleichen. Donner, P. (2025). Erste unter Gleichen. Forschung und Lehre (online first).
|
Virtueller KDSF-Community-Austausch zur formalen Darstellung und zum Austauschformat. Both, G., & Biesenbender, S. (2025). Workshop Virtueller KDSF-Community-Austausch zur formalen Darstellung und zum Austauschformat, virtuell.
|
Public participation and transparency: Does open governance promote inclusion and accountability? Cruz Romero, R. (2025). Public participation and transparency: Does open governance promote inclusion and accountability? JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 17(2), 31-64. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v17i2.963
|
Publishing fine-grained standardized metadata – Lessons learned from three research data centers. Wenzig, K., Daniel, A., Hansen, D., Koberg, T., & Tudose, M. (2025). Publishing fine-grained standardized metadata – Lessons learned from three research data centers. (Working Paper 12 I 2025). Berlin: Konsortium für die Sozial-, Verhaltens-, Bildungs- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften (KonsortSWD).
|
A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for detecting protein complexes in PPI networks using gene ontology. Abbas, M. N., Broneske, D., & Saake, G. (2025). A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for detecting protein complexes in PPI networks using gene ontology. Scientific Reports, 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01667-y
|
Transparency in open science: An actionable principle? Cruz Romero, R. (2025). Transparency in open science: An actionable principle? Open Information Science, 9(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2025-0016
|
Studienabbruch als Ausdruck problematischer Passungsverhältnisse im universitären Informatikstudium. Schneider, H. (2025). Studienabbruch als Ausdruck problematischer Passungsverhältnisse im universitären Informatikstudium. In H. Bremer & A. Lange-Vester (Hrsg.), Soziale Milieus und Habitus im Feld der Bildung (S. 107-122). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
|
Honorierung von Leitlinienarbeit: die Perspektive der Engagierten. In der Smitten, S., Aman, V., Sorgatz, N., Traylor, C., & Herrmann-Lingen, C. (2025). Honorierung von Leitlinienarbeit: die Perspektive der Engagierten. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen (online first). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2025.04.004
|
The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on social inequalities in international student mobility: A scoping review. Almeida, J., Netz, N., Nika, D., Krzaklewska, E., Aguiar, J., ... & Malet Calvo, D. (2025). The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on social inequalities in international student mobility: A scoping review. Comparative Migration Studies, 13(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-025-00436-0
Abstract
This systematic literature review sheds light on social inequalities in students’ access to and experiences of international student mobility (ISM) in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. Following a scoping approach based on the 2020 PRISMA guidelines, it synthesises 48 empirical studies published in the most intense phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, namely between January 2020 and June 2022.
|
