Articles

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Is academic freedom associated with strong science?

Lovakov, A. (2024).
Is academic freedom associated with strong science? In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14168639

Funding decision and applicants' careers. A case study of an early career grant.

Möller, T. (2024).
Funding decision and applicants' careers. A case study of an early career grant. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14171970

Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond.

Tcypina, A. (2024).
Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14161803

Data inaccuracy quantification and uncertainty propagation for bibliometric indicators.

Donner, P. (2024).
Data inaccuracy quantification and uncertainty propagation for bibliometric indicators. Research Evaluation, 33. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae047
Abstract

This study introduces an approach to estimate the uncertainty in bibliometric indicator values that is caused by data errors. This approach utilizes Bayesian regression models, estimated from empirical data samples, which are used to predict error-free data. Through direct Monte Carlo simulation—drawing many replicates of predicted data from the estimated regression models for the same input data—probability distributions for indicator values can be obtained which provide the information on their uncertainty due to data errors. [...]

Evidence use in higher education decision-making and policy: a scoping review of empirical studies from 2010 to 2022.

Thiedig, C., & Wegner, A. (2024).
Evidence use in higher education decision-making and policy: a scoping review of empirical studies from 2010 to 2022. London Review of Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.22.1.36

Die Forschungs- und Arbeitsbedingungen internationaler Wissenschaftler:innen an deutschen Hochschulen.

Fabian, G., & Heger, C. (2024).
Die Forschungs- und Arbeitsbedingungen internationaler Wissenschaftler:innen an deutschen Hochschulen. In DAAD/DZHW (Hrsg.), Wissenschaft weltoffen. Daten und Fakten zur Internationalität von Studium und Forschung in Deutschland und weltweit. (S. 82-85). Bielefeld: wbv.

The research and working conditions of international scientists at German universities.

Fabian, G., & Heger, C. (2024).
The research and working conditions of international scientists at German universities. In DAAD/DZHW (Hrsg.), Wissenschaft weltoffen 2024. Facts and Figures on the International Nature of Studies and Research in Germany and Worldwide. (S. 82-85). Bielefeld: wbv.

Gastbeitrag: Internationale Wissenschaftler/innen auf dem Weg zur Professur an deutschen Universitäten.

Jaudzims, S., & Oberschelp, A. (2024).
Gastbeitrag: Internationale Wissenschaftler/innen auf dem Weg zur Professur an deutschen Universitäten. Wissenschaft Weltoffen: Daten und Fakten zur Internationalität von Studium und Forschung in Deutschland und weltweit 2024. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst und Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung, 86-87.

Assessing bibliodiversity through reference lists: A text analysis approach.

Cruz Romero, R., Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2024).
Assessing bibliodiversity through reference lists: A text analysis approach. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024) (S. 1-14). Berlin: STI2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14045592
Abstract

The presence or absence of publishers in large bibliographic databases highlights tangible and symbolic differences between small and large publishers, underlining their diverging incentive structures. To assess these differences, this contribution explores reference data from small (open access) publishers and their journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. The analysis focuses on references that are not indexed in these databases and examines them from a text-as-data approach. The study frames two dimensions of relevance - visibility and impact - as proxies for assessing the scholarly bibliodiversity represented by small (open access) publishers.

The role of place in international student mobility.

Netz, N., Van Mol, C., Riaño, Y., & Raghuram, P. (2024).
The role of place in international student mobility. Globalisation, Societies and Education (online first). https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2024.2414036
Abstract

Place is an important factor influencing international student mobility (ISM). However, few studies have comprehensively examined the role of place in ISM. This special issue intends to narrow this gap by considering the role of place in ISM from different perspectives. The articles contributing to the special issue discuss three dimensions of place, namely the physical characteristics of place, the meanings and valuations of place, and social inequalities associated with place. The special issue highlights several theoretical, methodological, and empirical avenues to further advance research on the role of place in ISM.

Why do some retracted articles continue to get cited?

Schmidt, M. (2024).
Why do some retracted articles continue to get cited? Scientometrics, 2024 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05147-4

New Developments in Research Data Management - The Potential of AI.

Azeroual, O., & Schöpfel, J. (2024).
New Developments in Research Data Management - The Potential of AI. Encyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science - Academia Press, 2024(2), 206-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00253-4

How accurate are Scopus publication counts of researchers? A survey-bibliometric comparison for Germany.

Fenton, A., Donner, P., Ambrasat, J., Fabian, G., & Heger, C. (2024).
How accurate are Scopus publication counts of researchers? A survey-bibliometric comparison for Germany. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024.
Abstract

The number of researchers' publications is a widely used proxy measure for scientific output, individual achievement, and performance. Despite well-known criticism from the bibliometric community, the use of bibliometric databases as a basis for measuring publication output is widespread. At the same time, there are established survey instruments that also measure the publication output per researcher. We use survey-bibliometric matching with Scopus publication records to compare the alternative publication counts. A Scopus author ID match could be found for 70 % of the respondent researchers. The number of publications per researcher varies greatly between these data sources. [...]

From scandal to reform: approaches to research integrity at a turning point.

Hesselmann, F., & Reinhart, M. (2024).
From scandal to reform: approaches to research integrity at a turning point. Journal of Responsible Innovation 11(1). Journal of Responsible Innovation, https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414491 (Abgerufen am: 21.11.2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414491

Open and overlooked: the penalties for preprint open access papers and translated journals in citation analysis.

Donner, P. (2024).
Open and overlooked: the penalties for preprint open access papers and translated journals in citation analysis. In STI2024 (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024). Berlin: STI2024.
Abstract

The citations to open access preprint versions of papers and citations to papers in journals translated to English are not regularly counted in major proprietary citation index databases or in ordinary bibliometric research assessment even though they arguably reflect a true part of a work’s scientific impact. Here we explore the extent of these phenomena using Web of Science data.

Contact

Anja Gottburgsen
Dr. Anja Gottburgsen +49 511 450670-912