Publications

DZHW publishes its research findings in renowned academic journals, at national and international conferences and in its own publishing formats. An overview of publications and lectures produced by DZHW staff can be seen below. You can open individual publication formats separately using the menu in the left-hand column.

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Bildung und sozialer Zusammenhalt. „Aktionsrat Bildung. (2024). vbw – Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft“.

Anders, Y., Hannover, B., Jungbauer-Gans, M., Lenzen, D., McElvany, N., ... & Wößmann, L. (2024).
Bildung und sozialer Zusammenhalt. „Aktionsrat Bildung. (2024). vbw – Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft“.: Waxmann Verlag (ISBN: 978-3-8309-4870-4).

A pilot study for " Linked Open Research Data " (LORDpilot): a LOD-based Concept Registry for social science research data.

Daniel, A., Goebel, J., Kern, D., Klein, D., May, A., ... & Zapilko, B. (2024).
A pilot study for "Linked Open Research Data" (LORDpilot): a LOD-based Concept Registry for social science research data. Joint final report to the Project (public part). Hannover: DZHW.
Abstract

Reusing research data is an important part of research practice in the social and economic sciences. To find suitable data, researchers need functional search options. However, a comprehensive search for data is hampered by inconsistent or missing semantic indexing because different survey programs use their own terminology for documentation. In most cases, there is no link between the measured theoretical concepts and the variables. From the user's perspective, the fragmentation of data documentation hampers data retrieval and thus limits the research potential of existing data. The challenge, therefore, lies in the concept-oriented indexing of data. [...] Full Abstract: https://zenodo.org/records/11047523

Austausch mit Vertreter*innen aus Wissenschaftsministerien zum Thema Forschungsinformationen und -berichterstattung.

Kommission für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland, Petersohn, S., & Biesenbender, S. (2024).
Workshop Austausch mit Vertreter*innen aus Wissenschaftsministerien zum Thema Forschungsinformationen und -berichterstattung, virtuell.

Is there gender bias in awarding cum laude for the PhD thesis?

van den Besselaar, P., & Mom, C. (2024).
Is there gender bias in awarding cum laude for the PhD thesis? Scientometrics, 1-23 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04985-6
Abstract

In the Dutch academic system, PhD theses can be awarded with cum laude and at most 5% of all PhD graduates receive this selective distinction for their thesis. In this paper, we investigate whether there is gender bias in awarding cum laude, using data from one of the major Dutch research universities. A main result is that the set of PhD theses receiving cum laude on average do not have a higher quality than the best theses not getting cum laude. A second main result is that, after controlling for the quality of the PhD theses, women still have a substantially lower probability to receive cum laude. These results strongly suggest that the distribution of awards suffers from gender bias.

Migration als Gesellschaftsaufgabe. Teilhabe- und Repräsentationsverhältnisse aus einer postmigrantischen Perspektive.

İkiz-Akıncı, D., & Foroutan, N. (2024).
Migration als Gesellschaftsaufgabe. Teilhabe- und Repräsentationsverhältnisse aus einer postmigrantischen Perspektive. In S. Bostancı & E. Ilgün-Birhimeoğlu (Hrsg.), Elementarpädagogik in der postmigrantischen Gesellschaft. Theoretische und empirische Zugänge zu einer rassismuskritischen Pädagogik (S. 12-32). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.

Investigating Students’ Academic Self-Concepts and Persistence in STEM: How Do Gender Differences Relate to Female Representation?

Fiedler, I. (2024).
Investigating Students’ Academic Self-Concepts and Persistence in STEM: How Do Gender Differences Relate to Female Representation? International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 16(1), 1-17.

Informationsveranstaltung zum KDSF-Standard für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland.

Geschäftsstelle der KFiD, & Projektgruppe FIS Thüringer Hochschulen (2024).
Workshop Informationsveranstaltung zum KDSF-Standard für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland.

Internal factors promoting research collaboration problems: an input‑process‑output analysis.

Hückstädt, M., & Leisten, L. M. (2024).
Internal factors promoting research collaboration problems: an input‑process‑output analysis. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04957-w

Die Studierendenbefragung in Deutschland 2021. Daten- und Methodenbericht zur Erhebung.

Becker, K., Schwabe, U., Völk, D., Koopmann, J., Gerdes, F., ... & Klein, D. (2024).
Die Studierendenbefragung in Deutschland 2021. Daten- und Methodenbericht zur Erhebung. Hannover: DZHW.
Abstract

"The Student Survey in Germany" (2021) is a newly designed study that integrates three previously separate student surveys (Beuße et al., 2022): the Social Survey (Middendorff et al., 2017; Middendorff & Wallis, 2023), the Student Survey (Multrus et al., 2017; Multrus, 2021) and the survey "best - Studying with impairments" (Poskowsky et al., 2018; Unger et al., 2012). The study is designed as a cross-sectional survey with a long-term character. The new, integrated student survey thus continues the long tradition of the Social Survey and the Student Survey as important cross-sectional long-term observation studies for describing and analysing higher education and the student [...] Full Abstract: https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:sid2021:1.0.0

A case study on the development of the German Corona-Warn-App.

Fawaz Enaya, M., Klingbeil, T., Krüger, J., Broneske, D., Feinbube, F., & Saake, G. (2024).
A case study on the development of the German Corona-Warn-App. Journal of Systems and Software. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112020

„Diversität“ in Befragungen des Deutschen Zentrums für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung.

Gottburgsen, A., & Jungbauer-Gans, M. (2024).
„Diversität“ in Befragungen des Deutschen Zentrums für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung. (DZHW Brief 01|2024). Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.34878/2024.01.dzhw_brief

VORAUS: Etablierte Formate der Qualitätssicherung weiterentwickeln: Auf welche VORbehalte und Einverständnisse trifft eine teil-randomisierte AUSwahl von Forschungsprojekten im wissenschaftlichen Feld?

Johannsen, J., Philipps, A., Barlösius, E., & İkiz-Akıncı, D. (2024).
VORAUS: Etablierte Formate der Qualitätssicherung weiterentwickeln: Auf welche VORbehalte und Einverständnisse trifft eine teil-randomisierte AUSwahl von Forschungsprojekten im wissenschaftlichen Feld? Daten- und Methodenbericht zum Datenpaket der qualitativen Teilstudie des Projekts VORAUS. Hannover: DZHW.
Abstract

he project "VORAUS: Further developing established quality assurance formats: Which VORreservations and consensuses does a partially randomised SELECTION of research projects encounter in the scientific field?" was funded by the BMBF from April 2019 to March 2022. The study investigated reservations and consensus in the scientific field regarding partial randomisation. On this basis, it was clarified what is currently considered appropriate in science. Prior to a quantitative survey on the topic, the data from which is also available as a data package (DOI: https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:vorausquanti:1.0.0), problem-centred interviews were conducted with [...] Full Abstract: https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:vorausquali:1.0.0

The Costs of Competition in Distributing Scarce Research Funds.

Schweiger, G., Barnett, A., van den Besselaar, P., Bornmann, L., De Block, A., ... & Conix, S. (2024).
The Costs of Competition in Distributing Scarce Research Funds. Arxiv Preprint. Ithaca, NY: Arxiv.
Abstract

Research funding systems are not isolated systems - but embedded in a larger scientific system with an enormous influence on the system. This paper aims to analyze the allocation of competitive research funding from different perspectives: How reliable are decision processes for funding? What are the economic costs of competitive funding? How does competition for funds affect doing risky research? How do competitive funding environments affect scientists themselves, and which ethical issues must be considered? We attempt to identify gaps in our knowledge and propose recommendations for policymakers and funding agencies, including empirical experiments of decision processes and collection of data on these processes.

Adult refugees and asylum seekers’ basic need satisfaction and educational success in pre-study programmes in Germany.

Grüttner, M. (2024).
Adult refugees and asylum seekers’ basic need satisfaction and educational success in pre-study programmes in Germany. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 1-20 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714241237976
Abstract

Host country education can be crucial for the social integration as well as labour market outcomes of refugees and asylum seekers. To meet the same admission criteria for studying at German higher education institutions (HEI) as other international student applicants, refugees and asylum seekers can attend pre-study programmes at preparatory colleges or language centres of HEI. According to the self-determination theory, the satisfaction of basic psychological needs is relevant to learning motivation and success in educational contexts. This paper examines the differences in the satisfaction of basic needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) and learning motivation between refugees and other international student applicants, and the ext

Die Akademisierung und die Evolution der Lohnstruktur nach Bildungsabschlüssen.

Ordemann, J., & Pfeiffer, F. (2024).
Die Akademisierung und die Evolution der Lohnstruktur nach Bildungsabschlüssen. (ZEWpolicybrief 2|2024). Mannheim: ZEW.

Contact

Anja Gottburgsen
Dr. Anja Gottburgsen +49 511 450670-912