Vorträge und Tagungen
1000 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-555 556-570 571-585 586-600 601-615 616-630 631-645 646-660 661-675 676-690 691-705 706-720 721-735 736-750 751-765 766-780 781-795 796-810 811-825 826-840 841-855 856-870 871-885 886-900 901-915 916-930 931-945 946-960 961-975 976-990 991-1000
Roles and perceptions of publication genres in times of crisis.Simons, A., & Schniedermann, A. (2024, September).Roles and perceptions of publication genres in times of crisis. Vortrag auf der Konferenz Science, Technology, Humanity, and the Earth. 11th ESHS Conference, European Society for the History of Science (ESHS), Barcelona, Spain. |
Between Academic Requirements and Societal Impact: Inquiring Disciplinary Differences in Scientists’ Navigation of Knowledge Transfer.Just, A., & Janßen, M. (2024, August).Between Academic Requirements and Societal Impact: Inquiring Disciplinary Differences in Scientists’ Navigation of Knowledge Transfer. Vortrag auf der Konferenz "Tension, trust and transformation"- 16th European Sociological Association Conference, European Sociological Association, Porto, Portugal. |
Who Benefits from Job Security? Job Satisfaction and Performance in Academia.Ambrasat, J., & Fabian, G. (2024, August).Who Benefits from Job Security? Job Satisfaction and Performance in Academia. Vortrag auf der Konferenz "Tension, trust and transformation"- 16th European Sociological Association Conference, European Sociological Association, Porto, Portugal. |
From Evidence to Impact? Practices of Evidence Use for Quality Management at German Higher Education Institutions.Wegner, A., Krempkow, R., & Thiedig, C. (2024, August).From Evidence to Impact? Practices of Evidence Use for Quality Management at German Higher Education Institutions. Vortrag auf der Tagung Annual EAIR Forum 2024, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. |
Individual perception of bias in grant peer review strongly associated with openness towards the introduction of lotteries.Heger, C. (2024, Juli).Individual perception of bias in grant peer review strongly associated with openness towards the introduction of lotteries. Vortrag auf der Konferenz EASST-4S 2024 - Making and doing Transformations, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU) Athena Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands. |
Altmetrics and the liquification of research quality: how big data potentiality aligns research (evaluation) with platform capitalism.Leckert, M., & Sachse, J. (2024, Juli).Altmetrics and the liquification of research quality: how big data potentiality aligns research (evaluation) with platform capitalism. Vortrag auf der Konferenz Making and Doing Transformations, the 2024 quadrennial joint meeting of the European Association for the Study of Science and Technology (EASST) and the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S), Athena Institute at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Abstract
Recent years have witnessed a revival of the old question what research quality is and how best to assess it. These debates have been propelled by the intermingling of new metrics and novel value concepts. We first relate researchers' quality conceptions to their appraisal of metric indicators (25 semi-structured interviews). Second, we contrast these views with 14 expert interviews about Altmetrics' perils and potentials. Valuing indicators that reflect scientific chains of production, researchers judge few Altmetrics as useful. Conversely, experts value Altmetrics' potentials to explore new impacts and align evaluation accordingly. Altmetrics exemplify a reterritorialization of research (evaluation) along the lines of platform capitalism. |
Pour une éthique de l'IA dans le domaine de l'évaluation de la recherche.Azeroual, O., & Schöpfel, J. (2024, Juni).Pour une éthique de l'IA dans le domaine de l'évaluation de la recherche. Vortrag auf dem Seminar Anniversary Seminar of the International Thematic Network for Ethics in Human Sciences, le "Réseau Thématique International sur l’Ethique en SHS"!, Ecole Doctorale SHS, Geriico, iSchool, l’Université de Lille en coopération avec l’UNESP - São Paulo State University, Brazil & University of León, Spain et du Groupe sur l’Éthique et le Numérique en Information - Communication (GENIC) de la SFSIC, Lille, Frankreich. Abstract
Our study examines the importance of ethical considerations related to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in research evaluation. The theme underscores the need to integrate ethical principles into the development and application processes of AI algorithms to ensure fair, transparent, and unbiased evaluations. It highlights the potential risks and challenges associated with the use of AI in research evaluation and proposes measures to mitigate these risks. The goal is to establish guidelines and best practices that promote the responsible use of AI in research evaluation and ensure the integrity of the evaluation process. |
Ergebnisse der Umfrage zur Evaluation der Gesamtbetriebsvereinbarung Arbeitszeit und Arbeitsort (GBV-AZAO).Heger, C. (2024, Juni).Ergebnisse der Umfrage zur Evaluation der Gesamtbetriebsvereinbarung Arbeitszeit und Arbeitsort (GBV-AZAO). Impulsvortrag auf dem Workshop zur Evaluation der GBV-AZAO, DZHW, Hannover. |
Aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um den KDSF und die KFiD.Biesenbender, S., & Petersohn, S. (2024, Juni).Aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um den KDSF und die KFiD. Vortrag im Rahmen der Informationsveranstaltung zum KDSF-Standard für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland, Geschäftsstelle der KFiD und BMBF. Abstract
Der Vortrag umfasste eine Einführung in den KDSF-Standard. Darüber hinaus wurden das Arbeitsprogramm und aktuellen Schwerpunkte der Kommission für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland (KFiD) sowie die aktuellen Pläne zur strukturellen Weiterentwicklung des KDSF und weiterer Angebote der KFiD vorgestellt. |
“And the winner is…” – PIDs for research awards and prizes in the KDSF Standard for Research Information.Both, G., & Güdler, J. (2024, Juni).“And the winner is…” – PIDs for research awards and prizes in the KDSF Standard for Research Information. Vortrag auf der Tagung PiDfest, National Library of Technology, Prague, Czech Republic. https://doi.org/10.48813/0j74-8x07 Abstract
Research prizes shape careers in science and humanities. One prize often leads to another. Research organizations pride themselves with winners of prestigious prizes. Yet, it can be challenging for research organizations to keep track of their laureates. In our talk we will introduce you to our upcoming registry and metadata service for research awards and prizes which will tackle this challenge. The registry will provide PIDs and metadata for relevant research prizes and awards, such as, Shaw Prizes, Holberg prize, and Leibniz prize but also for academic honors, such as the appointment of honorary professors and the acquisition of a prestigious ERC grant. The planned metadata include information on subject, country of origin [...] |
Kontakt
