Does Wikipedia Cover the Relevant Literature on Major Innovations Timely? An Exploratory Case Study of CRISPR/Cas9.
Schmidt, M., Kircheis, W., Simons, A., Potthast, M., & Stein, B. (2021). Does Wikipedia Cover the Relevant Literature on Major Innovations Timely? An Exploratory Case Study of CRISPR/Cas9. In W. Glänzel, S. Heeffer, P.-S. Chi, & R. Rousseau (Hrsg.), 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics - Proceedings (S. 1021-1026). Leuven: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (I.S.S.I.).
|
The neglected politics behind evidence-based policy: shedding light on instrument constituency dynamics.
Simons, A., & Schniedermann, A. (2021). The neglected politics behind evidence-based policy: shedding light on instrument constituency dynamics. Policy & Politics (online first). https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16225469993170
|
Perspectives on translation in practice. How practitioners between bench and bedside evaluate biomedical translation.
Simons, A., Hendriks, B., Reinhart. M., & Ahmed, F. (2020).
Perspectives on translation in practice. How practitioners between bench and bedside evaluate biomedical translation.
Science & Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa035
|
Assessing the Organizational Climate for Translational Research with a New Survey Tool.
Simons, A., Riedel, N., Toelch, U., Hendriks, B., Ohlraun, S., Liebenau, L., ... & Reinhart, M. (2020).
Assessing the Organizational Climate for Translational Research with a New Survey Tool.
Science and Engineering Ethics.
|
How practicioners between bench and bedside evaluate biomedical translation.
Simons, A., Hendriks, B., Reinhart, M., & Ahmed, F. (2019).
How practicioners between bench and bedside evaluate biomedical translation.
SocArXiv [preprint]. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/srcma
|
What are clinician scientists expected to do? The undefined space for professionalizable work in translational biomedicine.
Hendriks, B., Simons, A., & Reinhart, M. (2019).
What are clinician scientists expected to do? The undefined space for professionalizable work in translational biomedicine.
Minerva(Reihe), Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09367-4
Abstract
Clinician scientists have gained institutional support in the era of translational research, as the key solution to closing the ‘translational gap’ between biomedical research and medical practice. However, clinician scientists remain an ‘endangered species’ in search of a secure niche, while new grants and training programs attempt to counteract their measurable decline in numbers over the past decades. Our study asks how an occupational space for clinician scientists is currently situated between the politics of translation, professional dynamics, and the specialization of academic disciplines. We interviewed clinician scientists, their adjacent professions—clinicians and biomedical researchers—, and contrast their views with expectations
|
Wo und wie gelingt Translation? Einschätzungen aus der Praxis am Berliner Institut für Gesundheitsforschung.
Simons, A., Hendriks, B., Dirnagl, U., Riedel, N., Tölch, U., Ahmed, F., & Reinhart, M. (2018).
Wo und wie gelingt Translation? Einschätzungen aus der Praxis am Berliner Institut für Gesundheitsforschung.
Forschung & Lehre, 25 (10).
|
Instrument Constituencies. Promoting Policy Designs.
Voß, J., & Simons, A. (2018).
Instrument Constituencies. Promoting Policy Designs.
In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Hrsg.), Handbook of Policy Design. Routledge.
|
A Novel Understanding of Experimentation in Governance: Co-Producing Innovations between ‘Lab’ and ‘Field'.
Voß, J., & Simons, A. (2018).
A Novel Understanding of Experimentation in Governance: Co-Producing Innovations between ‘Lab’ and ‘Field'.
Policy Sciences, 51(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9313-9
|
The concept of instrument constituencies: accounting for dynamics and practices of knowing governance.
Simons, A., & Voß, J.-P. (2018).
The concept of instrument constituencies: accounting for dynamics and practices of knowing governance.
Policy and Society, 37(1), 14-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1375248
|
Policy Instrument Constituencies.
Simons, A., & Voß, J. (2017).
Policy Instrument Constituencies.
In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Hrsg.), Handbook of Policy Formulation (S. 355-372). Edward Elgar.
|
Documented Authority. The Discursive Construction of Emissions Trading in the Expert Literature. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.
Simons, A. (2016).
Documented Authority. The Discursive Construction of Emissions Trading in the Expert Literature. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.
|
Offene Werkstätten – Nachhaltig Innovativ? Potenziale Gemeinsamen Arbeitens Und Produzierens in Der Gesellschaftlichen Transformation. Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung.
Simons, A., Petschow, U., & Peukert, J. (2016).
Offene Werkstätten – Nachhaltig Innovativ? Potenziale Gemeinsamen Arbeitens Und Produzierens in Der Gesellschaftlichen Transformation. Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung.
|
Local emergence and international developments of conservation trading systems: innovation dynamics and related problems.
Mann, C., & Simons, A. (2015).
Local emergence and international developments of conservation trading systems: innovation dynamics and related problems.
Environmental Conservation, 42(4), 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892914000381
|
Responsible management of social experiments: Challenges for policymaking.
Robaey, Z., & Simons, A. (2015).
Responsible management of social experiments: Challenges for policymaking.
In B. Koops, J. van den Hoven, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra & I. Oosterlake (Hrsg.), Responsible Innovation, Volume 2: Concepts, approaches, and applications (S. 87-104). Springer.
|
