What are clinician scientists expected to do? The undefined space for professionalizable work in translational biomedicine.
Hendriks, B., Simons, A., & Reinhart, M. (2019).
What are clinician scientists expected to do? The undefined space for professionalizable work in translational biomedicine.
Minerva(Reihe), Wiesbaden: Springer.
Abstract
Clinician scientists have gained institutional support in the era of translational research, as the key solution to closing the ‘translational gap’ between biomedical research and medical practice. However, clinician scientists remain an ‘endangered species’ in search of a secure niche, while new grants and training programs attempt to counteract their measurable decline in numbers over the past decades. Our study asks how an occupational space for clinician scientists is currently situated between the politics of translation, professional dynamics, and the specialization of academic disciplines. We interviewed clinician scientists, their adjacent professions—clinicians and biomedical researchers—, and contrast their views with expectations
|
Wo und wie gelingt Translation? Einschätzungen aus der Praxis am Berliner Institut für Gesundheitsforschung.
Simons, A., Hendriks, B., Dirnagl, U., Riedel, N., Tölch, U., Ahmed, F., & Reinhart, M. (2018).
Wo und wie gelingt Translation? Einschätzungen aus der Praxis am Berliner Institut für Gesundheitsforschung.
Forschung & Lehre, 25 (10).
|
Instrument Constituencies. Promoting Policy Designs.
Voß, J., & Simons, A. (2018).
Instrument Constituencies. Promoting Policy Designs.
In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Hrsg.), Handbook of Policy Design. Routledge.
|
A Novel Understanding of Experimentation in Governance: Co-Producing Innovations between ‘Lab’ and ‘Field'.
Voß, J., & Simons, A. (2018).
A Novel Understanding of Experimentation in Governance: Co-Producing Innovations between ‘Lab’ and ‘Field'.
Policy Sciences, 51(2), 213-229.
|
The concept of instrument constituencies: accounting for dynamics and practices of knowing governance.
Simons, A., & Voß, J.-P. (2018).
The concept of instrument constituencies: accounting for dynamics and practices of knowing governance.
Policy and Society, 37(1), 14-35.
|
Policy Instrument Constituencies.
Simons, A., & Voß, J. (2017).
Policy Instrument Constituencies.
In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Hrsg.), Handbook of Policy Formulation (S. 355-372). Edward Elgar.
|
Documented Authority. The Discursive Construction of Emissions Trading in the Expert Literature. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.
Simons, A. (2016).
Documented Authority. The Discursive Construction of Emissions Trading in the Expert Literature. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.
|
Offene Werkstätten – Nachhaltig Innovativ? Potenziale Gemeinsamen Arbeitens Und Produzierens in Der Gesellschaftlichen Transformation. Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung.
Simons, A., Petschow, U., & Peukert, J. (2016).
Offene Werkstätten – Nachhaltig Innovativ? Potenziale Gemeinsamen Arbeitens Und Produzierens in Der Gesellschaftlichen Transformation. Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung.
|
Local emergence and international developments of conservation trading systems: innovation dynamics and related problems.
Mann, C., & Simons, A. (2015).
Local emergence and international developments of conservation trading systems: innovation dynamics and related problems.
Environmental Conservation, 42(4), 325-334.
|
Responsible management of social experiments: Challenges for policymaking.
Robaey, Z., & Simons, A. (2015).
Responsible management of social experiments: Challenges for policymaking.
In B. Koops, J. van den Hoven, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra & I. Oosterlake (Hrsg.), Responsible Innovation, Volume 2: Concepts, approaches, and applications (S. 87-104). Springer.
|
Fact-making in permit markets: document networks as infrastructures of emissions trading.
Simons, A. (2015).
Fact-making in permit markets: document networks as infrastructures of emissions trading.
In J. Voß & R. Freeman (Hrsg.), Knowing governance. The epistemic construction of political order. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
|
Politics by other means. The making of the emissions trading instrument as a 'pre-history' of carbon trading.
Simons, A., & Voß, J. (2015).
Politics by other means. The making of the emissions trading instrument as a 'pre-history' of carbon trading.
In R. Lane & B. Stephan (Hrsg.), The politics of carbon markets (S. 51-68). New York, USA, London, England: Routledge.
|
Kontroversen ums Teilen. Ein Überblick über das online gestützte Peer-to-Peer Sharing als gesellschaftliche Innovation und eingehende allgemeine und spezifische Kontroversen. PeerSharing Arbeitsbericht 2. Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung.
Vogelpohl, T., & Simons, A. (2015).
Kontroversen ums Teilen. Ein Überblick über das online gestützte Peer-to-Peer Sharing als gesellschaftliche Innovation und eingehende allgemeine und spezifische Kontroversen. PeerSharing Arbeitsbericht 2. Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung.
|
Challenging futures of citizen panels. Critical issues for robust forms of public participation. A Report Based on an Interactive, Anticipatory Assessment of the Dynamics of Governance Instruments, 26 April 2013. Berlin. Technische Universität Berlin.
Mann, C., Voß, J., Amelung, N., Simons, A., Runge, T., & Grabner, L. (2014).
Challenging futures of citizen panels. Critical issues for robust forms of public participation. A Report Based on an Interactive, Anticipatory Assessment of the Dynamics of Governance Instruments, 26 April 2013. Berlin. Technische Universität Berlin.
|
Challenging futures of biodiversity offsets and banking. Critical issues for robust forms of biodiversity conservation. A Report Based on an Interactive, Anticipatory Assessment of the Dynamics of Governance Instruments, 19 April 2013. Technische Universität Berlin.
Mann, C., Voß, J., Simons, A., Amelung, N., & Runge, T. (2014).
Challenging futures of biodiversity offsets and banking. Critical issues for robust forms of biodiversity conservation. A Report Based on an Interactive, Anticipatory Assessment of the Dynamics of Governance Instruments, 19 April 2013. Technische Universität Berlin.
|
