Malte Hückstädt

Malte Hückstädt

Research Area Governance in Higher Education and Science
Researcher
  • +49 511 450670-358
  • +49 511 450670-960
Projects

List of projects

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination
Determinants and effects of cooperation in homogeneous and heterogeneous research clusters (DEKiF)
Publications

List of publications

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

How do researchers perceive problems in research collaboration? Results from a large-scale study of German scientists.

Weinmann, C., Hückstädt, M., Meißner, F., & Vowe, G. (2023).
How do researchers perceive problems in research collaboration? Results from a large-scale study of German scientists. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2023 (8) (online first). https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1106482

Ten reasons why research collaborations succeed—a random forest approach.

Hückstädt, M. (2023).
Ten reasons why research collaborations succeed—a random forest approach. Scientometrics (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04629-7

Forschungskooperation im Verbund.

Hückstädt, M., Janßen, M., Oberschelp, A., Wagner, N., Weinmann, C., & Winde, M. (2022).
Forschungskooperation im Verbund. Future Lab: Kooperationsgovernance - Diskussionspapier 2022 (6). Essen: Stifterverband für die deutsche Wissenschaft e.V.
Abstract

Collaborative research is becoming increasingly important. By linking competences and experiences, sharing cost-intensive resources and bringing together different disciplinary perspectives, synergy effects are generated and innovative research projects are promoted. However, the collaboration of researchers also involves risks that can be traced back to the framework conditions that characterise the collaboration of the participants. The DEKiF project ("Determinants and Effects of Cooperations in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Research Associations") examines the implementation of collaborative research within the framework of different sub-studies with the aim of mapping cooperation problems.

Coopetition between frenemies–interrelations and effects of seven collaboration problems in research clusters.

Hückstädt, M. (2022).
Coopetition between frenemies–interrelations and effects of seven collaboration problems in research clusters. Scientometrics, 2022(127), 5191-5224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04472-w

Selection criteria in professorial recruiting as indicators of institutional similarity? A comparison of German universities and universities of applied sciences.

Kleimann, B., & Hückstädt, M. (2021).
Selection criteria in professorial recruiting as indicators of institutional similarity? A comparison of German universities and universities of applied sciences. Quality in Higher Education (online first). https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2021.1889760

Leistungsbewertung in Berufungsverfahren. Traditionswandel in der akademischen Personalselektion.

Kleimann, B., İkiz-Akıncı, D., & Hückstädt, M. (2019).
Leistungsbewertung in Berufungsverfahren. Traditionswandel in der akademischen Personalselektion. Daten- und Methodenbericht zur qualitativen Erhebung der DZHW-Studie LiBerTas 2016. Version 1.0.0. Hannover: fdz.DZHW.

Determinanten der subjektiv wahrgenommenen Wichtigkeit von Hochschulrankings bei der Studienortwahl?

Hückstädt, M. (2019).
Determinanten der subjektiv wahrgenommenen Wichtigkeit von Hochschulrankings bei der Studienortwahl? In L. Ringel & T. Werron (Hrsg.), Rankings - Soziologische Fallstudien (S. 181-202). Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26366-9_8

Auswahlkriterien in Berufungsverfahren: Universitäten und Fachhochschulen im Vergleich.

Kleimann, B., & Hückstädt, M. (2018).
Auswahlkriterien in Berufungsverfahren: Universitäten und Fachhochschulen im Vergleich. Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, 40 (2/2018), 20-47.
Presentations

List of presentations & conferences

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Was macht Forschungsverbünde erfolgreich? Der Beitrag des Forschungsverbundmanagements – Befunde und Empfehlungen aus den Teilstudien des DZHW.

Hückstädt, M., & Janßen, M. (2022, Januar).
Was macht Forschungsverbünde erfolgreich? Der Beitrag des Forschungsverbundmanagements – Befunde und Empfehlungen aus den Teilstudien des DZHW. Impulsvortrag auf dem Workshop "Was macht Forschungsverbünde erfolgreich? Beobachtungen und Empfehlungen für Wissenschaftsmanagement und Förderpolitik", Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW), Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Hannover.

Was macht Forschungsverbünde erfolgreich? Beobachtungen und Empfehlungen für Wissenschaftsmanagement und Förderpolitik.

Oberschelp, A., Jungbauer-Gans, M., Kleimann, B., Janßen, M., Hückstädt, M., & Qu, Z. (2022, Januar).
Was macht Forschungsverbünde erfolgreich? Beobachtungen und Empfehlungen für Wissenschaftsmanagement und Förderpolitik, Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW), Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Hannover.
Abstract

Collaborations in research, whether between organizations, across disciplines or across national borders, are a major trend in science. They generate synergy effects and often make innovative research projects possible in the first place. At the same time, collaborations between sometimes very different partners face not inconsiderable risks which, in the worst case, can lead to the common goals not being achieved. In the workshop "What makes research collaborations successful?" empirical findings on the causes and coping strategies of cooperation problems will be presented and discussed together with actors from the field.

Benefits and challenges of collaboration in research. Investigating the manifold aspects of mono-, inter- and transdisciplinary collaboration.

Jungbauer-Gans, M., Kleimann, B., Janßen, M., Qu, Z., Hückstädt, M., ... & Weinmann, C. (2021, November).
Benefits and challenges of collaboration in research. Investigating the manifold aspects of mono-, inter- and transdisciplinary collaboration, Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW), Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft, Hannover.
Abstract

Increasing interorganizational, national and international, and inter- and transdisciplinary collaboration is a megatrend in science. It has become an essential part of knowledge production, being associated with various advantages. However, scientific collaboration is also facing manifold challenges, e.g. transaction costs, trust, power struggles etc. The question arises how collaboration is possible under conditions of prevailing competition in science. The one-day workshop brought together scholars that study the practices, outcomes, and effects of collaboration from different perspectives and with different methodological approaches.