Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Executive summary.
Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Executive summary. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/459056
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?
|
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 1, Country case studies.
Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 1, Country case studies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/409116
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?
|
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 2, Literature study and indicator review.
Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 2, Literature study and indicator review. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/884
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?
|
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 3, Country fiches.
Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 3, Country fiches. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/952691
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?
|
Testing the feasibility of a European graduate study: Final report of the EUROGRADUATE feasibility study.
Mühleck, K., Grabher, A., Hauschildt, K., Litofcenko, J., Mishra, S., Ryska, R., ... & Zelenka, M. (2016).
Testing the feasibility of a European graduate study: Final report of the EUROGRADUATE feasibility study. Hanover, Germany: German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW). ISBN 978-3-86426-049-0
|
National-level capacities for studying HE graduates in Europe: EUROGRADUATE research digest.
Mühleck, K., & Hauschildt, K. (2015).
National-level capacities for studying HE graduates in Europe: EUROGRADUATE research digest. Hanover, Germany: German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW).
|
EUROGRADUATE - Europas Hochschulabsolventen im Visier.
Mühleck, K., & Orr, D. (2014).
EUROGRADUATE - Europas Hochschulabsolventen im Visier. DUZ Spezial: DZHW Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung. Erhebunge, Forschung, Service, 32-33, Berlin.
|
Evolving diversity II. Participation of students with an immigrant background in European Higher Education.
Camilleri, A. F., & Mühleck, K. (2013).
Evolving diversity II. Participation of students with an immigrant background in European Higher Education. Brüssel: EquNet Konsortium.
|
Tracking learners' and graduates' progression paths: TRACKIT. EUA publications 2012.
Gaebel, M., Hauschildt, K., Mühleck, K., & Smidt, H. (2012).
Tracking learners' and graduates' progression paths: TRACKIT. EUA publications 2012. Brussels, Belgium: European University Association.
|
Erträge akademischer und nicht-akademischer Bildung, Ein Vergleich von Studienberechtigten mit Berufsausbildungs- und Hochschulabschluss zwanzig Jahre nach Erlangung der Hochschulreife.
Spangenberg, H., Mühleck, K., & Schramm, M. (2012).
Erträge akademischer und nicht-akademischer Bildung, Ein Vergleich von Studienberechtigten mit Berufsausbildungs- und Hochschulabschluss zwanzig Jahre nach Erlangung der Hochschulreife. (HIS:Forum Hochschule 11/2012). Hannover: HIS. ISBN 978-3-86426-017-9
|
duz-Special: Tracking. Dem Studienerfolg auf der Spur.
HIS-Institut für Hochschulforschung (Hrsg.) - HIS-Beiträge von Mühleck, K., Hauschildt, K., Jaeger, M., Sanders, S., Heublein, U., Kerst, C., ... & Briedis, K. (2012).
duz-Special: Tracking. Dem Studienerfolg auf der Spur. duz-Magazin(2).
|
Europäischer Hochschulraum im Vergleich: Informationen zum Studienverlauf bieten Hochschulen und Politik mehr Steuerungsmöglichkeiten als reine Bestandsdaten.
Mühleck, K., Spexard, A., & Hauschildt, K. (2012).
Europäischer Hochschulraum im Vergleich: Informationen zum Studienverlauf bieten Hochschulen und Politik mehr Steuerungsmöglichkeiten als reine Bestandsdaten. duz-Magazin (2), 8–9.
|
Verlässliche Daten gewinnen. Hochschulen und Politik wollen wissen, wie erfolgreich Hochschulabsolventen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt sind.
Mühleck, K., Spexard, A., & Hauschildt, K. (2012).
Verlässliche Daten gewinnen. Hochschulen und Politik wollen wissen, wie erfolgreich Hochschulabsolventen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt sind. duz-Magazin (2), 14–15.
|
On the Tracks of Students and Graduates: Methods and Uses of Tracking Procedures in the European Higher Education Area.
Mühleck, K. (2012).
On the Tracks of Students and Graduates: Methods and Uses of Tracking Procedures in the European Higher Education Area. In A. Curaj, P. Scott, L. Vlăsceanu & L. Wilson (Hrsg.), European Higher Education at the Crossroads. Between the Bologna Process and National Reforms, Vol. 2 (S. 223-243). Heidelberg, New York, USA, Dordrecht, Niederlande, London, England: Springer.
|
Der Einfluss des Migrationshintergrundes auf die Teilhabe an höherer Bildung im europäischen Vergleich.
Griga, D., & Mühleck, K. (2011).
Der Einfluss des Migrationshintergrundes auf die Teilhabe an höherer Bildung im europäischen Vergleich. In M. Leszczensky & T. Barthelmes (Hrsg.), HIS:Forum Hochschule 8/2011: Herausforderung Internationalisierung. Die Hochschulen auf dem Weg zum Europäischen Hochschulraum. Stand und Perspektiven (S. 63-78). Hannover: HIS.
|
