Why refugee students are more likely to drop out of pre-university programs. Berg, J. (2024). Why refugee students are more likely to drop out of pre-university programs. Let's Talk About by cogitatiopress. Online: cogitatio press.
|
Ausstattungs-, Kosten- und Leistungsvergleich Fachhochschulen 2021. Jenkner, P., Dölle, F., Faßbinder, S., Sanders, S., & Winkelmann, G. (2024). Ausstattungs-, Kosten- und Leistungsvergleich Fachhochschulen 2021. Kennzahlenergebnisse für die Länder Berlin, Bremen, Hamburg, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Sachsen-Anhalt und Schleswig-Holstein auf Basis des Jahres 2021. Hannover: DZHW.
|
Publikationen aus DFG-geförderten Projekten. Meier, A., Mittermaier, B., Möller, T., Ottaviani, M., Scheidt, B., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2023). Publikationen aus DFG-geförderten Projekten. Praxis und Nutzbarkeit von Funding Acknowledgements. Bonn: DFG.
|
Die Studierendenbefragung in Deutschland: best3. Steinkühler, J., Beuße, M., Kroher, M., Gerdes, F., Schwabe, U., ... & Buchholz, S. (2023). Die Studierendenbefragung in Deutschland: best3. Studieren mit einer gesundheitlichen Beeinträchtigung. Hannover: DZHW.
|
WGTDISTRIM: Stata module to trim extreme sampling weights (version 1.0.0) [Stata-ado]. Lang, S., & Klein, D. (2023). WGTDISTRIM: Stata module to trim extreme sampling weights (version 1.0.0) [Stata-ado]. Hannover: Github.
Abstract
wgtdistrim trims extreme sampling weights using the weight distribution approach suggested by Potter (1990). The reciprocal of the sampling weights are assumed to follow a (scaled) beta distribution. The parameters of the beta distribution are estimated from the sampling weights and the trimming levels (cut-offs) are computed for the specified percentiles. Sampling weights that are more extreme than the specified percentiles are trimmed to these percentiles and the excess is distributed equally among the untrimmed sampling weights so that the sum of the trimmed sampling weights equals the sum of the untrimmed sampling weights. This process is repeated a specified number of times (or until the trimmed sampling weights do no longer change).
|
Synthesis report on gender differences in grant application behaviour. Möller, T., Holzinger, F., Schön, L., Wedening, P., & Deixelberger, B. (2023). Synthesis report on gender differences in grant application behaviour. Berlin: DZHW.
Abstract
This deliverable provides a summary of the findings of Work Package 7 of the GRANteD project. The results are based on seven online surveys carried out among researchers in six European countries. In Austria, Ireland, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden, applicants to specific research funding programs were surveyed. In Germany, a representative survey was conducted among academics as potential applicants at universities (DZHW Scientist Survey). In addition, the data of doctoral graduates of the DZHW PhD panel were analyzed. The overall findings indicates that there are hardly any gender differences in application behavior of academics.
|
What to do against gender bias in grant allocation? van den Besselaar, P., Mom, C., Cruz-Castro, L., Sanz Menéndez, L., Möller, T., ... & Husu, L. (2023). What to do against gender bias in grant allocation? Amsterdam: TMC.
Abstract
This text summarized the recommendations that can be distilled from the research done in the GRANteD project, and from the interactions with the Stakeholder Committee, the Scientific Advisory Board, and at other exchanges with researchers in the field and with stakeholders in different interactions.
|
Evidenznutzung an Hochschulen/Forschungseinrichtungen und in der Hochschul- und Forschungspolitik – Protokoll eines Scoping Reviews. Wegner, A., & Thiedig, C. (2023). Evidenznutzung an Hochschulen/Forschungseinrichtungen und in der Hochschul- und Forschungspolitik – Protokoll eines Scoping Reviews. Berlin: ZENODO. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10034215
Abstract
This protocol describes the objectives and the methodological approach of a scoping review. The review considers German- and English-language empirical studies that deal with factors influencing the use of evidence in the higher education and science sector.
|
Wissenschaftskulturen in Deutschland. Ploder, M., Müller, R., & Blümel, C. (2023). Wissenschaftskulturen in Deutschland. Eine Studie im Auftrag der VolkswagenStiftung. Hannover: VolkswagenStiftung.
|
Forty and over the academic hill? Biological and academic age and the race for tenure. Ordemann, J., & Naegele, L. (2023). Forty and over the academic hill? Biological and academic age and the race for tenure. Online first: SocArXiv.
Abstract
This paper investigates the relationship between age and attaining a tenured position in academia (postdoctoral researcher or professorship at a university of applied sciences or university). Following considerations about ageism towards doctoral graduates who were 40 years and older (40+) upon attaining a PhD and Robert K. Merton’s idea of cumulative advantages in academic careers (Matthew-Effect), we differentiate between biological and academic age. We test the relationships and the resources accumulated behind the latter using data from the DZHW PhD Panel 2014. Applying piecewise constant exponential estimations and an entropy balancing, we find that PhDs aged 40+ experience a significantly positive effect on attaining a professorship.
|
Absolventenbefragung 2017. Daten- und Methodenbericht zur Erhebung der Absolvent*innenkohorte 2017. Schmidtchen, H., Euler, T., & Oestreich, T. (2023). Absolventenbefragung 2017. Daten- und Methodenbericht zur Erhebung der Absolvent*innenkohorte 2017. Hannover: FDZ-DZHW.
Abstract
The 2017 graduate survey is conducted in the context of the DZHW graduate study series, which uses standardized surveys to collect information on the studies, career entry, career path and further qualification of university graduates. The first graduate panel was conducted in 1989, and since then every fourth cohort of graduates has been surveyed.
The 2017 graduate survey is the first collaborative project in the context of the DZHW graduate study series. The joint partners DZHW, INCHER, and ISTAT aim to take into account the interests of different user groups as comprehensively as possible. [...] Full abstract: https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:gra2017:1.0.0
|
QuaMedFo - Qualitätsmaße zur Evaluierung medizinischer Forschung: Projektbericht. Biesenbender, S. (2023). QuaMedFo - Qualitätsmaße zur Evaluierung medizinischer Forschung: Projektbericht. Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.2314/KXP:1871786746
|
Die Studierendenbefragung in Deutschland: 22. Sozialerhebung. Kroher, M., Beuße, M., Isleib, S., Becker, K., Ehrhardt, M.-C., ... & Buchholz, S. (2023). Die Studierendenbefragung in Deutschland: 22. Sozialerhebung. Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Deutschland 2021. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
|
10.-21. Sozialerhebung 1982-2016. Daten- und Methodenbericht zum gepoolten Datensatz der zwölf Studierendenbefragungen. Middendorff, E., & Wallis, M. (2023). 10.-21. Sozialerhebung 1982-2016. Daten- und Methodenbericht zum gepoolten Datensatz der zwölf Studierendenbefragungen. Hannover: DZHW.
Abstract
The report on the cumulative data set for the 10th-21st Social Survey (1982 - 2016) explains the data preparation process and describes the variables in the data set. The survey series has a unique regional scope, is based on large, random samples, and is thus a powerful source of data for studies of the aspects covered over time. It allows a differentiated examination of students with various characteristics, such as by type of university, university entrance, subject groups, gender, age groups, educational and regional origins, financial situation, living arrangements, partnership status, and parenthood. [...] Full abstract: https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:ssypool:3.0.0
|
Das soziale Profil in der Begabtenförderung. Daten- und Methodenbericht zur Befragung der Geförderten 2008. Middendorff, E. (2023). Das soziale Profil in der Begabtenförderung. Daten- und Methodenbericht zur Befragung der Geförderten 2008. Hannover: DZHW.
Abstract
The report is part of the data package "The Social Profile in the Promotion of the Gifted 2008". The scientific use file contains information on a total of 9,540 recipients of support from the eleven organizations for the promotion of the gifted that existed in Germany in 2008 - including 7,947 recipients of support for studies and 1,593 recipients of support for doctoral studies. In addition to specific questions on the promotion of the gifted, the questionnaire was based on the 18th Social Survey (2006). This allows direct comparison with the population or different student groups, especially on topics such as sociodemographic characteristics, social origin, [...] Full abstract: https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:gif2008:1.0.0
|