beeinträchtigt studieren - best2, Datenerhebung zur Situation Studierender mit Behinderung und chronischer Krankheit 2016/17.
Poskowsky, J., Heißenberg, S., Zaussinger, S., Brenner, J. (2018).
beeinträchtigt studieren - best2, Datenerhebung zur Situation Studierender mit Behinderung und chronischer Krankheit 2016/17.
Hannover, Berlin, Wien: DZHW, DSW, IHS.
|
beeinträchtigt studieren – best2, Fragebogen.
Poskowsky, J., Heißenberg, S., Zaussinger, S., Brenner, J. (2018).
beeinträchtigt studieren – best2, Fragebogen.
Hannover, Berlin, Wien: DZHW, DSW, IHS.
|
beeinträchtigt studieren - best2, Liste teilnehmender Hochschulen.
Poskowsky, J., Heißenberg, S., Zaussinger, S., Brenner, J. (2018).
beeinträchtigt studieren - best2, Liste teilnehmender Hochschulen.
Hannover, Berlin, Wien: DZHW, DSW, IHS.
|
beeinträchtigt studieren - best2, Ergänzende Tabellen.
Poskowsky, J., Heißenberg, S., Zaussinger, S., Brenner, J. (2018).
beeinträchtigt studieren - best2, Ergänzende Tabellen.
Hannover, Berlin, Wien: DZHW, DSW, IHS.
|
Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Berlin 2016. Regionalauswertung der 21. Sozialerhebung durchgeführt vom DZHW für das studierendenWERK BERLIN.
Schirmer, H. (2018).
Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Berlin 2016. Regionalauswertung der 21. Sozialerhebung durchgeführt vom DZHW für das studierendenWERK BERLIN.
Berlin: studierendenWERK BERLIN.
|
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Executive summary.
Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Executive summary.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/459056
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?
|
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 1, Country case studies.
Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 1, Country case studies.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/409116
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?
|
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 2, Literature study and indicator review.
Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 2, Literature study and indicator review.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/884
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?
|
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 3, Country fiches.
Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 3, Country fiches.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/952691
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?
|
Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Hannover 2016. Regionalauswertung der 21. Sozialerhebung des DSW durchgeführt vom DZHW für das Studentenwerk Hannover.
Schirmer, H. (2018).
Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Hannover 2016. Regionalauswertung der 21. Sozialerhebung des DSW durchgeführt vom DZHW für das Studentenwerk Hannover.
Hannover: Studentenwerk Hannover.
|
Ausländische Studierende in Deutschland 2016. Ergebnisse der Befragung bildungsausländischer Studierender im Rahmen der 21. Sozialerhebung.
Apolinarski, B., Brandt, T. (2018).
Ausländische Studierende in Deutschland 2016. Ergebnisse der Befragung bildungsausländischer Studierender im Rahmen der 21. Sozialerhebung.
Bonn: BMBF.
|
So leben Studierende in Hamburg. Zur wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Lage der Studierenden in Hamburg 2016. Online-Befragung an Hamburger Hochschulen.
Schirmer, H. (2018).
So leben Studierende in Hamburg. Zur wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Lage der Studierenden in Hamburg 2016. Online-Befragung an Hamburger Hochschulen.
Hamburg: Studierendenwerk Hamburg.
|
Das Potenzial strategischer Öffnung. Stifterverband.
Fecher, B., Leimüller, G., & Blümel, C. (2018).
Das Potenzial strategischer Öffnung. Stifterverband.
|
Portfolio Evaluation FWF International Programmes. Final report.
Degelsegger-Marquéz, A., Wagner, I., Kroop, S., Rigby, J., Cox, D., Hinze, S., ... & Adams, J. (2018).
Portfolio Evaluation FWF International Programmes. Final report.
|
Social and economic conditions of student life in Europe: Synopsis of Indicators. EUROSTUDENT VI 2016-2018.
DZHW (Eds.) (2018).
Social and economic conditions of student life in Europe: Synopsis of Indicators. EUROSTUDENT VI 2016-2018.
Bielefeld, Germany: W. Bertelsmann Verlag.
|
