Berichte und sonstige Publikationen

Leider konnte für diese Suchkombination kein Ergebnis gefunden werden

Gesundheit Studierender in Deutschland 2017.

Grützmacher, J., Gusy, B., Lesener, T., Sudheimer, S., Willige, J. (2018).
Gesundheit Studierender in Deutschland 2017. Hannover, Berlin, Hamburg: DZHW, FU Berlin, TK.

Die Entwicklung der Studienabbruchquoten an den deutschen Hochschulen. Berechnungen auf Basis des Absolventenjahrgangs 2016.

Heublein, U., Schmelzer, R. (2018).
Die Entwicklung der Studienabbruchquoten an den deutschen Hochschulen. Berechnungen auf Basis des Absolventenjahrgangs 2016. DZHW-Projektbericht.

beeinträchtigt studieren - best2, Datenerhebung zur Situation Studierender mit Behinderung und chronischer Krankheit 2016/17.

Poskowsky, J., Heißenberg, S., Zaussinger, S., Brenner, J. (2018).
beeinträchtigt studieren - best2, Datenerhebung zur Situation Studierender mit Behinderung und chronischer Krankheit 2016/17. Hannover, Berlin, Wien: DZHW, DSW, IHS.

beeinträchtigt studieren – best2, Fragebogen.

Poskowsky, J., Heißenberg, S., Zaussinger, S., Brenner, J. (2018).
beeinträchtigt studieren – best2, Fragebogen. Hannover, Berlin, Wien: DZHW, DSW, IHS.

beeinträchtigt studieren - best2, Liste teilnehmender Hochschulen.

Poskowsky, J., Heißenberg, S., Zaussinger, S., Brenner, J. (2018).
beeinträchtigt studieren - best2, Liste teilnehmender Hochschulen. Hannover, Berlin, Wien: DZHW, DSW, IHS.

beeinträchtigt studieren - best2, Ergänzende Tabellen.

Poskowsky, J., Heißenberg, S., Zaussinger, S., Brenner, J. (2018).
beeinträchtigt studieren - best2, Ergänzende Tabellen. Hannover, Berlin, Wien: DZHW, DSW, IHS.

21. Sozialerhebung.

Becker, K., Baillet, F., & Weber, A. (2018).
21. Sozialerhebung. Daten- und Methodenbericht zu der Erhebung der wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Lage der Studierenden 2016. Daten- und Methodenbericht (Version 1.0.0). Hannover: fdz.DZHW.
Abstract

Die 21. Sozialerhebung ist Teil der Sozialerhebung des Deutschen Studentenwerks (DSW), einer seit 1951 bestehenden Untersuchungsreihe zur wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Lage der Studierenden in Deutschland. Es handelt sich um eine Querschnittserhebung, die meist in dreijährigem Abstand durchgeführt wird. Zum Kernbestand der Sozialerhebung gehören Fragen zum Hochschulzugang, zu Strukturmerkmalen des Studiums und Studienverlaufs, zur sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Lage (Studienfinanzierung, Lebenshaltungskosten, Erwerbstätigkeit, Wohnsituation), zu Themen des Tätigkeitsfeldes der Studentenwerke sowie zu sozio-demographischen Merkmalen. [...] Vollständiger Abstract: https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:ssy21:1.0.0

Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Berlin 2016. Regionalauswertung der 21. Sozialerhebung durchgeführt vom DZHW für das studierendenWERK BERLIN.

Schirmer, H. (2018).
Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Berlin 2016. Regionalauswertung der 21. Sozialerhebung durchgeführt vom DZHW für das studierendenWERK BERLIN. Berlin: studierendenWERK BERLIN.

Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Main report.

Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Main report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/048735
Abstract

The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?

Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Executive summary.

Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Executive summary. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/459056
Abstract

The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?

Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 1, Country case studies.

Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 1, Country case studies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/409116
Abstract

The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?

Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 2, Literature study and indicator review.

Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 2, Literature study and indicator review. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/884
Abstract

The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?

Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 3, Country fiches.

Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 3, Country fiches. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/952691
Abstract

The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level?

Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Hannover 2016. Regionalauswertung der 21. Sozialerhebung des DSW durchgeführt vom DZHW für das Studentenwerk Hannover.

Schirmer, H. (2018).
Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Hannover 2016. Regionalauswertung der 21. Sozialerhebung des DSW durchgeführt vom DZHW für das Studentenwerk Hannover. Hannover: Studentenwerk Hannover.

Ausländische Studierende in Deutschland 2016. Ergebnisse der Befragung bildungsausländischer Studierender im Rahmen der 21. Sozialerhebung.

Apolinarski, B., Brandt, T. (2018).
Ausländische Studierende in Deutschland 2016. Ergebnisse der Befragung bildungsausländischer Studierender im Rahmen der 21. Sozialerhebung. Bonn: BMBF.

Kontakt

Anja Gottburgsen
Dr. Anja Gottburgsen 0511 450670-912