Clemens Blümel

Clemens Blümel

Abteilung Forschungssystem und Wissenschaftsdynamik
Kommissarische Abteilungsleitung
  • 030 2064177-31
  • 030 2064177-99
Publikationen

Liste der Publikationen

Leider konnte für diese Suchkombination kein Ergebnis gefunden werden

Introduction to Special Issue: quantitative studies of science in Germany.

Blümel, C., & Gauch, S. (2021).
Introduction to Special Issue: quantitative studies of science in Germany. Scientometrics (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04203-7

Editors between support and control by the digital infrastructure — Tracing the peer review process with data from an editorial management system.

Hartstein, J., & Blümel, C. (2021).
Editors between support and control by the digital infrastructure — Tracing the peer review process with data from an editorial management system. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2021.747562/full (Abgerufen am: 20.10.2021) (online first).
Abstract

Many journals now rely on editorial management systems, which are supposed to support the administration and decision making of editors, while aiming at making the process of communication faster and more transparent to both reviewers and authors. Yet, little is known about how these infrastructures support, stabilize, transform or change existing editorial practices. By exploring process generated data from a publisher’s editorial management system, we investigate the ways by which the digital infrastructure is used and how it represents the different realms of the process of peer review. How does the infrastructure support, strengthen or restrain editorial agency for administrating the process?

Strukturwandel durch Innovation: Über die performative Verschränkung und Aneignung zweier Streitbegriffe in der Lausitz.

Blümel, C. (2021).
Strukturwandel durch Innovation: Über die performative Verschränkung und Aneignung zweier Streitbegriffe in der Lausitz. In J. Herberg, J. Staemmler, & P. Nanz (Hrsg.), Wissenschaft im Strukturwandel: Die paradoxe Praxis engagierter Transformationsforschung (S. 163-189). München: oekom.

What Synthetic Biology Aims At: Review Articles as Sites for Constructing and Narrating an Emerging Field.

Blümel, C. (2021).
What Synthetic Biology Aims At: Review Articles as Sites for Constructing and Narrating an Emerging Field. In K. Kastenhofer & S. Molyneux-Hodgson (Hrsg.), Community and Identity in Contemporary Technosciences (S. 65-84). Cham: Springer Nature (online first).
Abstract

The analysis of scientific communities and collectives are central to STS and the sociology of science. Reviewing practices, that is, practices of ordering, defining or delineating scientific fields can be understood as an often neglected, yet prevailing textual practice of community building, particularly in novel and emerging research fields, such as synthetic biology. In this article, I aim to explore the structure and content of review articles as a dedicated scholarly genre in synthetic biology, focusing on the period between 2002 and 2012.

Academic Social Networks and Bibliometrics.

Blümel, C. (2021).
Academic Social Networks and Bibliometrics. In Ball, R. (Hrsg.), Handbook Bibliometrics (S. 255-264). Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Saur.

History, Development and Conceptual Predecessors of Altmetrics.

Blümel, C., & Gauch, S. (2021).
History, Development and Conceptual Predecessors of Altmetrics. In Ball, R. (Hrsg.), Handbook Bibliometrics (S. 191-199). Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Saur.

Innovations in innovation policy: reconstructing the emergence, legitimation and dynamics of cluster policies in Germany.

Blümel, C. (2020).
Innovations in innovation policy: reconstructing the emergence, legitimation and dynamics of cluster policies in Germany. Innovation: The European Journal for Social Science Research, Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2020.1798216

What Synthetic Biology Aims At: Review Articles as Sites for Constructing and Narrating an Emerging Field.

Blümel, C. (2020).
What Synthetic Biology Aims At: Review Articles as Sites for Constructing and Narrating an Emerging Field. In Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook. [preprint]. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/npfkv

Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda.

Blümel, C., & Schniedermann, A. (2020).
Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda. Scientometrics, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03431-7

The Valuation of Online Science Communication: A Study Into the Scholarly Discourses of Altmetrics and Their Reception.

Blümel, C., & Gauch, S. (2020).
The Valuation of Online Science Communication: A Study Into the Scholarly Discourses of Altmetrics and Their Reception. Social Sciences Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3539133

Open Data in Biomedical Research: an exploratory study of perceptions and practices towards Open Data within a biomedical research facility: Berlin: DZHW.

Blümel, C. (2019).
Open Data in Biomedical Research: an exploratory study of perceptions and practices towards Open Data within a biomedical research facility: Berlin: DZHW.

Open Science und Open Innovation: Neue Indikatoren für die Analyse des Wissenschafts- und Innovationssystems im Digitalen Zeitalter.

Blümel, C. (2019).
Open Science und Open Innovation: Neue Indikatoren für die Analyse des Wissenschafts- und Innovationssystems im Digitalen Zeitalter. Berlin: Stifterverband Discussion Paper 1/2019.

Was gewinnen wir durch Open Science und Open Innovation?

Blümel, C., Fecher, B., & Leimüller, G. (2019).
Was gewinnen wir durch Open Science und Open Innovation? Essen: Stifterverband. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1880055

Open Science - a loosely coupled discourse? Comparing Open Science and Open Innovation from a bibliometric point of view.

Blümel, C., & Beng, F. (2018).
Open Science - a loosely coupled discourse? Comparing Open Science and Open Innovation from a bibliometric point of view. In STI 2018 Conference Proceedings. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. 12-14 September 2018, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Open Science - a loosely coupled discourse? Results from scientometric analysis In STI 2018 Conference Proceedings.

Blümel, C., & Beng, F. (2018).
Open Science - a loosely coupled discourse? Results from scientometric analysis In STI 2018 Conference Proceedings. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (S. 369-377). Leiden, The Netherlands.
Vorträge & Tagungen

Liste der Vorträge & Tagungen

Leider konnte für diese Suchkombination kein Ergebnis gefunden werden

Rekonstruktion des Peer-Review-Prozesses mit Ereignisdaten aus einem Editorial Management System.

Hartstein, J., & Blümel, C. (2022, März).
Rekonstruktion des Peer-Review-Prozesses mit Ereignisdaten aus einem Editorial Management System. Vortrag auf der Tagung Frühjahrstagung 2022 der DGS-Sektion Netzwerkforschung, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal.

Was ist Open Science?

Blümel, C. (2021, November).
Was ist Open Science? Vortrag im Rahmen der Open Data, Open Science, Open Innovation: Das Konzept von „Openness“ in Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft, Universität Potsdam, Potsdam.

Focus on ‘successful research’ leads to underestimation of research collaboration.

Hartstein, J., & Blümel, C. (2021, Oktober).
Focus on ‘successful research’ leads to underestimation of research collaboration. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 4S Annual Meeting 2021, The Society for Social Studies of Science (4S), Toronto, Canada.
Abstract

Science and Technology Studies, but also quantitative science studies carry a legacy of research evaluation, represented by concepts as diverse as the h-Index or Altmetrics, focussing on research output. Even research on research collaboration often aims at examining networks of (“successful”) knowledge production. Collaboration holds the promise to foster innovation – which is measured in scientometrics in terms of output. We argue, that digital traces of research in progress allow for gaining a more comprehensive picture of the research process and the research collaboration landscape. Failure does not invalidate research.

The Resolution of Epistemic Crises in Biomedicine: The Stage of Transparency.

Schniedermann, A., & Blümel, C. (2021, Oktober).
The Resolution of Epistemic Crises in Biomedicine: The Stage of Transparency. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 4S Annual Meeting 2021, Society for Social Studies of Science (4S).

Open Science zwischen Theorie und Bewegung.

Blümel, C. (2021, April).
Open Science zwischen Theorie und Bewegung. Vortrag im Rahmen der Lecture Series: Open Science und Forschungsqualität in Theorie und Praxis, Berlin University Alliance (BUA), Berlin.

Cognitive, physical, and virtual mobility in the sciences.

Blümel, C. (2021, März).
Cognitive, physical, and virtual mobility in the sciences. Impulsvortrag im Rahmen des Advisory Board Meeting of the Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation, Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung, Bonn.

On top of the hierarchy: evidence practices and practicing evidence of systematic reviews in biomedicine.

Schniedermann, A., & Blümel, C. (2020, Februar).
On top of the hierarchy: evidence practices and practicing evidence of systematic reviews in biomedicine. Vortrag auf der Konferenz Practicing Evidence-Evidence Practices, DFG Forschungsgruppe, 19.2.-21.2.2020, München.

Offene Wissenschaft – mehr Beteiligung?

Blümel, C. (2019, Dezember).
Offene Wissenschaft – mehr Beteiligung? Input auf dem Konvent des Forums für offene Innovationskultur des Stifterverbandes, 6.12.2019, Berlin.

Changing the system for scholarly reward? The emerging metadata landscape of digitized research evaluation.

Blümel, C. (2019, November).
Changing the system for scholarly reward? The emerging metadata landscape of digitized research evaluation. Vortrag auf dem Workshop: Digitalisierte Bewertungspraktiken in Wissenschaft und Hochschule, 14./15.11.2019, Berlin.

Studying review articles in scientometrics: methods, topics, and future prospects.

Blümel, C., & Schniedermann, A. (2019, September).
Studying review articles in scientometrics: methods, topics, and future prospects. Workshop given at the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2nd-5th September 2019, Rome, Italy.

Open Science and Open Innovation.

Blümel, C. (2019, Mai).
Open Science and Open Innovation. Vortrag am Ludwig Boltzmann Centre for Open Innovation in Science, Mai 2019, Wien, Österreich.

The Valuation of Digital Scholarly Communication: Platforms, Metrics, and Narratives.

Blümel, C. (2019, Februar).
The Valuation of Digital Scholarly Communication: Platforms, Metrics, and Narratives. Invited Talk an der TU München.

Wissenschaft im Wandel.

Blümel, C. (2019, Februar).
Wissenschaft im Wandel. Diskutant in Podiumsdiskussion mit Ijad Madisch, Gründer von ResearchGate an der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover.

Kommentar "Der Strukturwandel aus wissenschaftssoziologischer Perspektive".

Blümel, C. (2019, Januar).
Kommentar "Der Strukturwandel aus wissenschaftssoziologischer Perspektive". Vortrag auf dem Auftaktworkshop des Projekts "Strukturwandel in der Lausitz", Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), Potsdam.

Modes of Knowledge Transfer in Synthetic Biology: Between commercialisation and societal legitimation.

Blümel, C. (2019, Januar).
Modes of Knowledge Transfer in Synthetic Biology: Between commercialisation and societal legitimation. Presentation at the Max Planck Synthetic Biology (MaxSynbio) Innovation Workshop, Max-Planck Institut für Intelligente Systeme Stuttgart.
CV
Seit 01/2017

Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Deutschen Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung, Abteilung 2 Forschungssystem und Wissenschaftsdynamik

12/2013 - 10/2016

Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter im DFG Projekt "Reviews als Legitimationsressource neuer Forschungsfelder" im Rahmen des SPP 1409 Wissenschaft und Öffentlichkeit, HU Berlin

03/2010 - 2013

Koordinator des Masterstudiengangs Wissenschaftsforschung (Curriculumsentwicklung, Implementierung, Aufbau eines Kooperationsnetzwerks), HU Berlin

2008 - 2010

Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter im Competence Center Neue Technologien am Fraunhofer Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung, Karlsruhe

2007 - 2008

Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter in der Abteilung Neue Technologien am Fraunhofer Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung, Karlsruhe

2000 - 2007

Studium der Soziologie, Kommunikationswissenschaften und Psychologie an den Universitäten Dresden, Leipzig und der FU Berlin

Mehr erfahren Weniger anzeigen