Publications
1000 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-555 556-570 571-585 586-600 601-615 616-630 631-645 646-660 661-675 676-690 691-705 706-720 721-735 736-750 751-765 766-780 781-795 796-810 811-825 826-840 841-855 856-870 871-885 886-900 901-915 916-930 931-945 946-960 961-975 976-990 991-1000
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Executive summary.Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Executive summary. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/459056 Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level? |
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 1, Country case studies.Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 1, Country case studies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/409116 Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level? |
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 2, Literature study and indicator review.Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 2, Literature study and indicator review. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/884 Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level? |
Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 3, Country fiches.Vossensteyn, H., Kolster, R., Kaiser, F., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., ... & Gwosć, C. (2018).Promoting the Relevance of Higher Education. Annex 3, Country fiches. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/952691 Abstract
The main objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of higher education and how this is promoted in various countries in Europe and beyond. On the basis of a review of relevant literature, policy documents and databases, consultation with national experts and eight in-depth country case studies that included interviews with many national stakeholders, this study seeks to answer questions such as which policy levers do member states use to promote higher education relevance? Which national policies concerning higher education relevance appear to be effective and good practice examples? Which indicators are informative in assessing higher education relevance at system level? |
Erfolg im Studium. Konzeptionen, Befunde und Desiderate.Bornkessel, P. (Hrsg.) (2018).Erfolg im Studium. Konzeptionen, Befunde und Desiderate. Bielefeld: wbv. https://dx.doi.org/10.3278/6004654w |
Proximale Prädiktoren objektiver wie subjektiver Studienerfolgsindikatoren.Weber, A., Daniel, A., Becker, K., & Bornkessel, P. (2018).Proximale Prädiktoren objektiver wie subjektiver Studienerfolgsindikatoren. In P. Bornkessel (Hrsg.), Erfolg im Studium. Konzeptionen, Befunde und Desiderate (S. 59-107). Bielefeld: wbv. https://dx.doi.org/10.3278/6004654w |
Determinanten des Studienerfolgs nicht-traditioneller Studierender - zur Bedeutung der sozialen und akademischen Integration, der Lebensumstände und des Studienkontextes für die Studienabbruchneigung beruflich qualifizierter Studierender ohne Abitur.Dahm, G., Becker, K., & Bornkessel, P. (2018).Determinanten des Studienerfolgs nicht-traditioneller Studierender - zur Bedeutung der sozialen und akademischen Integration, der Lebensumstände und des Studienkontextes für die Studienabbruchneigung beruflich qualifizierter Studierender ohne Abitur. In P. Bornkessel (Hrsg.), Erfolg im Studium. Konzeptionen, Befunde und Desiderate (S. 108-174). Bielefeld: wbv. https://dx.doi.org/10.3278/6004654w |
Einleitung.Bornkessel, P. (2018).Einleitung. In P. Bornkessel (Hrsg.), Erfolg im Studium. Konzeptionen, Befunde und Desiderate (S. 7-28). Bielefeld: wbv. https://dx.doi.org/10.3278/6004654w |
Wissenschaft weltoffen 2018.Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (Hrsg.), Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (Hrsg.), Heublein, U., & Ebert, J. (2018).Wissenschaft weltoffen 2018. Daten und Fakten zur Internationalität von Studium und Forschung in Deutschland. https://doi.org/10.3278/7004002qw |
Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Hannover 2016. Regionalauswertung der 21. Sozialerhebung des DSW durchgeführt vom DZHW für das Studentenwerk Hannover.Schirmer, H. (2018).Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Hannover 2016. Regionalauswertung der 21. Sozialerhebung des DSW durchgeführt vom DZHW für das Studentenwerk Hannover. Hannover: Studentenwerk Hannover. |
A New Aspect of Internationalisation? Specific Challenges and Support Structures for Refugees on Their Way to German Higher Education.Berg, J. (2018).A New Aspect of Internationalisation? Specific Challenges and Support Structures for Refugees on Their Way to German Higher Education. In A. Curaj, L. Deca & R. Pricopie (Hrsg.), European Higher Education Area: The Impact of Past and Future Policies (S. 219-235). Cham: Springer. |
Wissenschaft weltoffen kompakt 2018 English edition.Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst & Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (Hrsg.) - DZHW-Mitarbeiter(innen): Heublein, U., & Ebert. J. (2018).Wissenschaft weltoffen kompakt 2018 English edition. Facts and Figures on the International Nature of Study and Research in Germany. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann. |
" Keep It Going, Girl! " An Empirical Analysis of Gender Differences and Inequalities in Computer Sciences.Förtsch, S., Gärtig-Daugs, A., Buchholz, S., & Schmid, U. (2018)." Keep It Going, Girl! " An Empirical Analysis of Gender Differences and Inequalities in Computer Sciences. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 10(2), 266-286. |
Ursachen, Folgen und Wandel der traditionellen Arbeitsteilung in Partnerschaften von Akademikerinnen und Akademikern.Brandt, G. (2018).Ursachen, Folgen und Wandel der traditionellen Arbeitsteilung in Partnerschaften von Akademikerinnen und Akademikern. Hannover: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität, Diss., X, 181 Seiten. https://doi.org/10.15488/3481 |
Contact
