Publikationen
819 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-555 556-570 571-585 586-600 601-615 616-630 631-645 646-660 661-675 676-690 691-705 706-720 721-735 736-750 751-765 766-780 781-795 796-810 811-819
Beschäftigungsbedingungen für junge Forscher*innen - ein empirischer Beitrag zu #IchBinHanna.Berroth, L., Adrian, D., Briedis, K., & Wegner, A. (2022).Beschäftigungsbedingungen für junge Forscher*innen - ein empirischer Beitrag zu #IchBinHanna. (DZHW Brief 04|2022). Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.34878/2022.04.dzhw_brief Abstract
Die durchschnittliche Vertragslaufzeit der an Hochschulen und Forschungseinrichtungen beschäftigten Promovierenden beträgt 27 Monate. 26 Prozent haben einen Arbeitsvertrag mit einer Laufzeit von bis zu 12 Monaten. Auch wenn sich somit gegenüber älteren Studien eine Entwicklung zu längeren Vertragslaufzeiten abzeichnet, bleibt dennoch eine Lücke zwischen den Vertragslaufzeiten von Promovierenden und den tatsächlichen Promotionsdauern. Die subjektive Einschätzung der Finanzierungs- und Beschäftigungssituation fällt überwiegend positiv aus: Etwa drei Viertel der Promovierenden sind damit zufrieden.Im Durchschnitt wenden Promovierende mit einem Arbeitsvertrag an einer Hochschule oder Forschungseinrichtung 23 Stunden pro Woche für ihre ... |
How to interpret algorithmically constructed topical structures of scientific fields? A case study of citation-based mappings of the research specialty of invasion biology.Held, M., & Velden (2022).How to interpret algorithmically constructed topical structures of scientific fields? A case study of citation-based mappings of the research specialty of invasion biology. Quantitative Science Studies (online first). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00194 Abstract
Often, bibliometric mapping studies remain at a very abstract level when assessing the validity or accuracy of the generated maps. In this case study of citation-based mappings of a research specialty, we dig deeper into the topical structures generated by the chosen mapping approaches and examine their correspondence to a sociologically informed understanding of the research specialty in question. Our analysis highlights the variety of types of topical relatedness and epistemic interdependency that citations can stand for. Unless we assume that invasion biology is unique, our analysis suggests that global algorithmic field classification approaches that use citation links indiscriminately may struggle to reconstruct research specialties. |
Indikatorenbasierte Berichterstattung zu Promovierenden - Ziele, Referenzen und Erläuterungen der Indikatoren und Kernziffern im Datenportal der National Academics Panel Study. Version 2.0.Wegner, A. (2022).Indikatorenbasierte Berichterstattung zu Promovierenden - Ziele, Referenzen und Erläuterungen der Indikatoren und Kernziffern im Datenportal der National Academics Panel Study. Version 2.0. Berlin: DZHW. |
MapOSR - A mapping review dataset of empirical studies on Open Science.Lasser, J., Schneider, J., Lösch, T., Röwert, R., Heck, T., ... & Skupien, S. (2022).MapOSR - A mapping review dataset of empirical studies on Open Science. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121665.1 Abstract
Research that investigates respective researchers’ engagement in Open Science varies widely in the topics addressed, methods employed, and disciplines investigated, which makes it difficult to integrate and compare its results. To investigate current outcomes of Open Science research, and to get a better understanding on well-researched topics and research gaps, we aimed at providing an openly accessible overview of empirical studies that focus on different aspects of Open Science in different scientific disciplines, academic groups and geographical regions. In this paper, we describe a data set of studies about Open Science practices retrieved following a PRISMA approach to compile a literature review. |
Gender disparities in Russian academia: a bibliometric analysis.Pilkina, M., & Lovakov, A. (2022).Gender disparities in Russian academia: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 2022( 127), 3577-3591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04383-w |
Transparency of open data ecosystems in smart cities: Definition and assessment of the maturity of transparency in 22 smart cities.Lnenicka, M., Nikiforova, A., Luterek, M., Azeroual, O., Ukpabi, D., Valtenbergs, V., & Machova, R. (2022).Transparency of open data ecosystems in smart cities: Definition and assessment of the maturity of transparency in 22 smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022(82), 103906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103906 |
A Record Linkage-Based Data Deduplication Framework with DataCleaner Extension.Azeroual, O., Jha, M., Nikiforova, A., Sha, K., Alsmirat, M., & Jha, S. (2022).A Record Linkage-Based Data Deduplication Framework with DataCleaner Extension. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2022(6), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6040027 |
Peer reviewers equally critique theory, method, and writing, with limited effect on the final content of accepted manuscripts.Stephen, D. (2022).Peer reviewers equally critique theory, method, and writing, with limited effect on the final content of accepted manuscripts. Scientometrics (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04357-y |
Eine interdisziplinäre Forschungsfeldklassifikation für die Wissenschaft.Trkulja, V., Stiller, J., Biesenbender, S., & Petras, V. (2022).Eine interdisziplinäre Forschungsfeldklassifikation für die Wissenschaft. Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 73(2-3), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2021-2209 |
RecSys Pertaining to Research Information with Collaborative Filtering Methods: Characteristics and Challenges.Azeroual, O., & Koltay, T. (2022).RecSys Pertaining to Research Information with Collaborative Filtering Methods: Characteristics and Challenges. MDPI Publications, 2022(10), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10020017 |
Internationally mobile scientists as knowledge transmitters: A lexical-based approach to detect knowledge transfer.Aman, V. (2022).Internationally mobile scientists as knowledge transmitters: A lexical-based approach to detect knowledge transfer. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (online first). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24641 |
From indexation policies through citation networks to normalized citation impacts: Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions as varying resonance chambers.Stahlschmidt, S., & Stephen, D. (2022).From indexation policies through citation networks to normalized citation impacts: Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions as varying resonance chambers. Scientometrics, 2022(127), 2413-2431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04309-6 |
Global visibility of nationally published research output: the case of the post-Soviet region.Lovakov, A., Panova, A., & Yudkevich, M. (2022).Global visibility of nationally published research output: the case of the post-Soviet region. Scientometrics, 2022(127), 2643-2659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04326-5 |
Kontakt

