Publikationen
819 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-555 556-570 571-585 586-600 601-615 616-630 631-645 646-660 661-675 676-690 691-705 706-720 721-735 736-750 751-765 766-780 781-795 796-810 811-819
Blurry Access: A Systematic Review of Transparency Literature.Cruz Romero, R. (2022).Blurry Access: A Systematic Review of Transparency Literature. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2022). Abstract
This review of the transparency literature has shown the evolution of the field through the prism of bibliographic and methodological data. In doing so, we have shed light into underlying disparities that go in line with arguments of structural problems and historical relations in socio-political contexts. We have highlighted the irony of the field in researching a topic that, due to determinants beyond the control of scholars (though OA policies may slowly generate a structural change), is in itself little transparent. The blurriness of the state of research in transparency and accountability helps us to address the overall debate of academic production in a critical manner, engaging with issues such as publishing and funding. |
Comparison of the citations of German medical science articles in questionable and non-questionable journals.Stephen, D. (2022).Comparison of the citations of German medical science articles in questionable and non-questionable journals. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2022), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6975638 |
Forschungskooperation im Verbund.Hückstädt, M., Janßen, M., Oberschelp, A., Wagner, N., Weinmann, C., & Winde, M. (2022).Forschungskooperation im Verbund. Future Lab: Kooperationsgovernance - Diskussionspapier 2022 (6). Essen: Stifterverband für die deutsche Wissenschaft e.V. Abstract
Kollaborative Forschung gewinnt zunehmend an Bedeutung. Durch die Verknüpfung von Kompetenzen und Erfahrungen, die gemeinsame Nutzung kostenintensiver Ressourcen und die Zusammenführung unterschiedlicher disziplinärer Sichtweisen werden Synergieeffekte erzeugt und innovative Forschungsvorhaben befördert. Die Zusammenarbeit von Forschenden beinhaltet jedoch auch Risiken, die auf die Rahmenbedingungen zurückzuführen sind, welche die Zusammenarbeit der Beteiligten kennzeichnen. Das Projekt DEKiF ("Determinanten und Effekte von Kooperationen in homogenen und heterogenen Forschungsverbünden") untersucht im Rahmen unterschiedlicher Teilstudien die Durchführung von Verbundforschung mit dem Ziel einer Kartierung von Kooperationsproblem. |
Retrieving Adversarial Cliques in Cognitive Communities: A New Conceptual Framework for Scientific Knowledge Graphs.Fabre, R., Azeroual, O., Bellot, P., Schöpfel, J., & Egret, D. (2022).Retrieving Adversarial Cliques in Cognitive Communities: A New Conceptual Framework for Scientific Knowledge Graphs. Future Internet, 2022, 14(9), 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14090262 |
Factors influencing the academic career – an event history analysis.Mom, C., van den Besselaar, P., & Möller, T. (2022).Factors influencing the academic career – an event history analysis. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicator (STI 2022), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6975565 |
What is researcher independence and how can it be measured?Möller, T., van den Besselaar, P., & Mom, C. (2022).What is researcher independence and how can it be measured? 26th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2022), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6975311 |
Structural properties and epistemic effects of scientific careers in transition to tenured professorships.Dittmann, P. (2022).Structural properties and epistemic effects of scientific careers in transition to tenured professorships. 26th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6975389 |
Algorithmic identification of Ph.D. thesis-related publications: a proof-of-concept study.Donner, P. (2022).Algorithmic identification of Ph.D. thesis-related publications: a proof-of-concept study. Scientometrics (online first). Abstract
In this study we propose and evaluate a method to automatically identify the journal publications that are related to a Ph.D. thesis using bibliographical data of both items. We build a manually curated ground truth dataset from German cumulative doctoral theses that explicitly list the included publications, which we match with records in the Scopus database. We then test supervised classification methods on the task of identifying the correct associated publications among high numbers of potential candidates using features of the thesis and publication records. The results indicate that this approach results in good match quality in general and with the best results attained by the “random forest” classification algorithm. |
Männlichkeit im Forschungsfeld „autonomes Fahren“. Zwischen Restabilisierung und Verunsicherung.Both, G., & Weber, L. (2022).Männlichkeit im Forschungsfeld „autonomes Fahren“. Zwischen Restabilisierung und Verunsicherung. In Kastein, M. et al. (Hrsg.), Care-Arbeit und Gender in der digitalen Transformation (S. 103-118). Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Juventa. |
On Top of the Hierarchy: How Guidelines Shape Systematic Reviewing in Biomedicine.Schniedermann, A., Blümel, C., & Simons, A. (2022).On Top of the Hierarchy: How Guidelines Shape Systematic Reviewing in Biomedicine. In S. Ehlers & S. Esselborn (Hrsg.), Evidence in Action between Science and Society - Constructing, Validating, and Contesting Knowledge (S. 102-126). New York: Routledge. |
Forschungsinformationssysteme und Ethik: eine doppelte Herausforderung.Azeroual, O., & Schöpfel, J. (2022).Forschungsinformationssysteme und Ethik: eine doppelte Herausforderung. Information – Wissenschaft & Praxis, 2022, 73(4), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2021-2208 |
Shaping the Qualities, Values and Standards of Science. How Reporting Guidelines Improve the Transparency of Biomedical Research.Schniedermann, A. (2022).Shaping the Qualities, Values and Standards of Science. How Reporting Guidelines Improve the Transparency of Biomedical Research. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. Frontiers, https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.846822 (Abgerufen am: 01.07.2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.846822 |
Kontakt

