Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups.
Akbaritabar, A., Traag, V.A., Caimo, A., & Squazzoni, F. (2020).
Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups.
Scientometrics. [online first]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03555-w
|
Sichtbarkeit und Bewertung.
Krüger, A., & Hesselmann, F. (2020).
Sichtbarkeit und Bewertung.
Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 49(2-3), 163-181. doi: 10.1515/zfsoz-2020-0015.
|
Gender patterns of publication in top sociological journals.
Akbaritabar, A., & Squazzoni, F. (2020).
Gender patterns of publication in top sociological journals.
Science, Technology, & Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0162243920941588
|
Data Wrangling in Database Systems: Purging of Dirty Data.
Azeroual, O. (2020).
Data Wrangling in Database Systems: Purging of Dirty Data.
Data, 6/2020, 50. Basel: MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5020050
|
References to literature from the business sector in patent documents: A case study of charging technologies for electric vehicles.
Qu, Z., & Zhang, S. (2020).
References to literature from the business sector in patent documents: A case study of charging technologies for electric vehicles.
Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03518-1
|
Reformopfer? Nicht wirklich! „New Public Management“, „Bologna“, die „Exzellenzinitiative“ – und die deutschen ProfessorInnen.
Schimank, U., & Janßen, M. (2020).
Reformopfer? Nicht wirklich! „New Public Management“, „Bologna“, die „Exzellenzinitiative“ – und die deutschen ProfessorInnen.
In Behrenbeck, S., Sager, K., & Schmidt, U. (Hrsg.), „Die ganze Hochschule soll es sein“. Wolff-Dietrich Webler zum 80. Geburtstag. Bielefeld: UVW Universitäts Verlag Webler.
|
How to Inspect and Measure Data Quality about Scientific Publications: Use Case of Wikipedia and CRIS Databases.
Azeroual, O., & Lewoniewski, W. (2020).
How to Inspect and Measure Data Quality about Scientific Publications: Use Case of Wikipedia and CRIS Databases.
Algorithms, 4/2020, 107, Basel, Switzerland: MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/a13050107
|
Mapping the coevolution, leadership and financing of research on viral vectors, RNAi, CRISPR/Cas9 and other genomic editing technologies.
Fajardo Ortiz, D.G., Shattuck, A., & Hornbostel, S. (2020).
Mapping the coevolution, leadership and financing of research on viral vectors, RNAi, CRISPR/Cas9 and other genomic editing technologies.
PLoS ONE(Reihe), Seitenzahl(en). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227593
|
What Synthetic Biology Aims At: Review Articles as Sites for Constructing and Narrating an Emerging Field.
Blümel, C. (2020).
What Synthetic Biology Aims At: Review Articles as Sites for Constructing and Narrating an Emerging Field.
In Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook. [preprint]. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/npfkv
|
Data Quality as a Critical Success Factor for User Acceptance of Research Information Systems.
Azeroual, O., Saake, G., Abuosba, M., & Schöpfel, J. (2020).
Data Quality as a Critical Success Factor for User Acceptance of Research Information Systems.
Data, 5/2020, 35, Basel, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5020035
|
Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda.
Blümel, C., & Schniedermann, A. (2020).
Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda.
Scientometrics, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03431-7
|
Mapping and semantic interoperability of the German RCD data model with the Europe-wide accepted CERIF.
Azeroual, O., & Herbig, N. (2020).
Mapping and semantic interoperability of the German RCD data model with the Europe-wide accepted CERIF.
Information Services and Use, 4/2020, 1-24, Netherlands: IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-200076
|
Influence of Information Quality via Implemented German RCD Standard in Research Information Systems.
Azeroual, O., Schöpfel, J., & Ivanovic, D. (2020).
Influence of Information Quality via Implemented German RCD Standard in Research Information Systems.
Data, 5/2020, 30. Basel, Switzerland: MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5020030
|
Wettbewerb um Forschungsmittel. Mangelhaft, mittelmäßig oder exzellent: Was kommt raus beim Peer Review?
Hornbostel, S. (2020).
Wettbewerb um Forschungsmittel. Mangelhaft, mittelmäßig oder exzellent: Was kommt raus beim Peer Review?
Forschung & Lehre, 3/20, 206-207. Bonn: Deutscher Hochschulverband.
|
International Joint Research Programming.
Flink, T. (2020).
International Joint Research Programming.
In Young, M., Flink, T., & Dall, E. (Hrsg.), Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project (S. 254-275). Berlin, Prag, Wien: Selbstverlag.
|
