What are clinician scientists expected to do? The undefined space for professionalizable work in translational biomedicine.
Hendriks, B., Simons, A., & Reinhart, M. (2019).
What are clinician scientists expected to do? The undefined space for professionalizable work in translational biomedicine. Minerva (57), 213-257, Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09367-4
Abstract
Clinician scientists have gained institutional support in the era of translational research, as the key solution to closing the ‘translational gap’ between biomedical research and medical practice. However, clinician scientists remain an ‘endangered species’ in search of a secure niche, while new grants and training programs attempt to counteract their measurable decline in numbers over the past decades. Our study asks how an occupational space for clinician scientists is currently situated between the politics of translation, professional dynamics, and the specialization of academic disciplines. We interviewed clinician scientists, their adjacent professions—clinicians and biomedical researchers—, and contrast their views with expectations
|
Making sense of social interaction: Emotional coherence drives semantic integration as assessed by event-related potentials.
Schauenburg, G., Conrad, M., von Scheve, Chr., Barber, H., Ambrasat, J., Aryani, A., & Schröder, T. (2019).
Making sense of social interaction: Emotional coherence drives semantic integration as assessed by event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia. (online first). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.002
|
A Conceptual Framework: An internal working paper defining the conceptual framework for the case studies.
Rungius, C. (2018).
A Conceptual Framework: An internal working paper defining the conceptual framework for the case studies. Deliverable 2.5, Berlin/Innsbruck/Vienna: S4D4C.
|
Der Kerndatensatz Forschung: Aufbau, Anwendung und die Rolle der Bibliothek.
Thiedig, C. (2018).
Der Kerndatensatz Forschung: Aufbau, Anwendung und die Rolle der Bibliothek. GMS Medizin — Bibliothek — Information, 18(3) 2018.
|
Elicitive Ansätze in der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung.
Rungius, C. (2018).
Elicitive Ansätze in der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. Bonn: lehrgut.hypotheses.org.
|
Does the Winner Take it All? Increasing Inequality in Scientific Authorship.
Rauhut, H., Winter, F., & Johann, D. (2018).
Does the Winner Take it All? Increasing Inequality in Scientific Authorship. In M. C. Buchmann & R. A. Scott (Hrsg.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Hoboken: Wiley Online. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0459
|
Text data mining and data quality management for research information systems in the context of open data and open science.
Azeroual, O., Saake, G., Abuosba, M., & Schöpfel, J. (2018).
Text data mining and data quality management for research information systems in the context of open data and open science. In ESI-CNRST, N. Ibnlkhayat (Hrsg.), Proceedings of 3rd International Colloquium on Open Access - Open Access to Science Foundations, Issues and Dynamics (29-46), 28-30 November 2018, Rabat-Morocco, 11/2018.
|
Using Argumentation Visualization to Foster Transparency of Development Processes: An Evaluation Study.
Riechert, M., Biesenbender, S., Becker, J., & Zarnekow, R. (2018).
Using Argumentation Visualization to Foster Transparency of Development Processes: An Evaluation Study. Research Papers in Information Systems Management, Band 19, 1-30, Berlin: Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin. http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-7147
|
Academic coaching and decision analysis: Ways of deciding whether to pursue an academic career.
Morais, A.S., & Hariskos, W. (2018).
Academic coaching and decision analysis: Ways of deciding whether to pursue an academic career. PLoS ONE 13(11): e0206961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206961
|
How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions.
Mayer, S. J., & Rathmann, J. M. K. (2018).
How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2933-1
|
Förderung und Evaluation der Forschung in den Lebenswissenschaften in der Schweiz – eine Interviewstudie.
Hendriks, B., Schendzielorz, C., & Reinhart, M. (2018).
Förderung und Evaluation der Forschung in den Lebenswissenschaften in der Schweiz – eine Interviewstudie. In The growth of science: Auswirkungen für die Forschungsevaluation und -förderung in der Schweiz. Politische Analyse und Empfehlungen des Schweizerischen Wissenschaftsrates SWR. Empirische Untersuchung von B. Hendriks, M. Reinhart und C. Schendzielorz, Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW), Berlin. Politische Analyse 2/2018. Berlin: Schweizer Wissenschaftsrat.
|
Wissenschaftlerbefragung 2016.
Neufeld, J., Johann, D. (2018).
Wissenschaftlerbefragung 2016. Methoden- und Datenbericht. (Version 1.0.0). Hannover: fdz.DZHW.
|
Science and its Others: Examining the discourse about scientific misconduct through a postcolonial lens.
Hesselmann, F. (2018).
Science and its Others: Examining the discourse about scientific misconduct through a postcolonial lens. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 26(4), Taylor & Francis, 393-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2018.1538065
|
The dynamically changing publication universe as a reference point in national impact evaluation: A counterfactual case study on the Chinese publication growth.
Stahlschmidt, S., & Hinze, S. (2018).
The dynamically changing publication universe as a reference point in national impact evaluation: A counterfactual case study on the Chinese publication growth. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3:30.
|
Wo und wie gelingt Translation? Einschätzungen aus der Praxis am Berliner Institut für Gesundheitsforschung.
Simons, A., Hendriks, B., Dirnagl, U., Riedel, N., Tölch, U., Ahmed, F., & Reinhart, M. (2018).
Wo und wie gelingt Translation? Einschätzungen aus der Praxis am Berliner Institut für Gesundheitsforschung. Forschung & Lehre, 25 (10).
|
