Publications

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Confounding cross-correlation: A meta-analysis of the association between citations and altmetrics.

Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2023).
Confounding cross-correlation: A meta-analysis of the association between citations and altmetrics. In ISSI (Hrsg.), Proceedings of ISSI 2023 – the 19th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (S. 449-454). Bloomington, United States: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.

Mining the History Sections of Wikipedia Articles on Science and Technology.

Kircheis, W., Schmidt, M., Simons, A., Stein, B., & Potthast, M. (2023).
Mining the History Sections of Wikipedia Articles on Science and Technology. 23rd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2023), 23 (online first).

QuaMedFo - Qualitätsmaße zur Evaluierung medizinischer Forschung: Projektbericht.

Biesenbender, S. (2023).
QuaMedFo - Qualitätsmaße zur Evaluierung medizinischer Forschung: Projektbericht. Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.2314/KXP:1871786746

Medical articles in questionable journals are less impactful than those in non-questionable journals but still extensively cited.

Stephen, D. (2023).
Medical articles in questionable journals are less impactful than those in non-questionable journals but still extensively cited. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04763-w

Herausgeberschaft und Verantwortung: Über die Un-/Abhängigkeit wissenschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften.

Knöchelmann, M. (2023).
Herausgeberschaft und Verantwortung: Über die Un-/Abhängigkeit wissenschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis (online first). https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2022-0090

Workshop: Austausch und Vernetzung zur Forschungsfeldklassifikation des KDSF.

Geschäftsstelle der KFiD, & CRIS.NRW (2023).
Workshop: Austausch und Vernetzung zur Forschungsfeldklassifikation des KDSF, Geschäftsstelle der KFiD und CRIS.NRW.

Elastic Stack and GRAPHYP Knowledge Graph of Web Usage: A Win–Win Workflow for Semantic Interoperability in Decision Making.

Azeroual, O., Fabre, R., Störl, U., & Qi, R. (2023).
Elastic Stack and GRAPHYP Knowledge Graph of Web Usage: A Win–Win Workflow for Semantic Interoperability in Decision Making. Future Internet, 2023, 15(6), 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15060190

Vernetzungstagung der Geschäftsstelle der KFiD und CRIS.NRW mit der HIS-RES-Community.

Geschäftsstelle der KFiD, & CRIS.NRW (2023).
Vernetzungstagung der Geschäftsstelle der KFiD und CRIS.NRW mit der HIS-RES-Community, Geschäftsstelle der KFiD und CRIS.NRW, Berlin.

Forschungsberichterstattung in Krisenzeiten: Führt die Corona-Pandemie zu einem Digitalisierungsschub?

Petersohn, S., & Thiedig, C. (2023).
Forschungsberichterstattung in Krisenzeiten: Führt die Corona-Pandemie zu einem Digitalisierungsschub? Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, 45(1), 100-113.

A diachronic perspective on citation latency in Wikipedia articles on CRISPR/Cas-9: an exploratory case study.

Schmidt, M., Kircheis, W., Simons, A., Potthast, M., & Stein, B. (2023).
A diachronic perspective on citation latency in Wikipedia articles on CRISPR/Cas-9: an exploratory case study. Scientometrics, 2023(128), 3649-3673.

Wie können interdisziplinäre Forschungsfelder klassifiziert werden?

Petras, V., Biesenbender, S., Stiller, J., & Trkulja, V. (2023).
Wie können interdisziplinäre Forschungsfelder klassifiziert werden? ABI Technik, 43(2), 148-148. https://doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2023-0024

The multidisciplinary roots of higher education research: An analysis of citation patterns.

Lovakov, A., & Yudkevich, M. (2023).
The multidisciplinary roots of higher education research: An analysis of citation patterns. Higher Education Quarterly, 2023(77), 890-910. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12438

IT-gestützte Forschungsberichterstattung – Ein neues Aufgabenprofil in der Qualitätssicherung von Forschung?

Thiedig, C., & Petersohn, S. (2023).
IT-gestützte Forschungsberichterstattung – Ein neues Aufgabenprofil in der Qualitätssicherung von Forschung? Hochschulmanagement, 18(1), 9-15.
Abstract

Heterogeneous reporting requirements and increasing expectations of strategic capacity building have prompted German research institutions to implement advanced database and information systems in order to improve their management of metadata on research activities, processes and outcomes (research information). Implementation and use of these systems in research reporting require specific expertise, opening up new task areas which have so far not been sufficiently studied. Based on a national survey among personnel responsible for IT-based research reporting in German Higher Education and research institutions, the contribution assesses whether research information management constitutes a new specialization in research management.

Do female academics submit fewer grant applications than men?

Möller, T. (2023).
Do female academics submit fewer grant applications than men? 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023). https://doi.org/10.55835/644303d4b2b5580ba561581a (Abgerufen am: 21.04.2023). https://doi.org/10.55835/644303d4b2b5580ba561581a
Abstract

The state of the research on grant application behaviour is that female academics submit fewer proposals than men. This study points out that it is methodologically challenging to draw this conclusion. We know a lot about applicants, but little about the pool of potential applicants as the underlying population. We use a random sample of academics as potential applicants to investigate the grant application activity of male and female researchers. The results show that when an appropriate benchmark is applied (in this case, controlling for academic status and research area), no significant gender differences in grant applications can be found.

On epistemic properties and field-specific logics in the study of knowledge transfer: Empirical evidence on researchers’ productive interactions from a nationwide survey in Germany.

Janßen, M., & Just, A. (2023).
On epistemic properties and field-specific logics in the study of knowledge transfer: Empirical evidence on researchers’ productive interactions from a nationwide survey in Germany. 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023). https://dapp.orvium.io/deposits/6442ca5b4c613a1222893e2d/view, https://dapp.orvium.io/deposits/6442ca5b4c613a1222893e2d/view (Abgerufen am: 04.10.2023).
Abstract

Researchers are increasingly expected to engage in knowledge transfer (KT), but often the specific expectations remain unclear. To approach the research object of KT, to map existing engagement and to identify barriers to KT, it is essential to include field-specific, discipline-based, and epistemic practice perspectives. Drawing on data from the 2019/2020 Science Survey, we demonstrate the necessity of these perspectives while incorporating the 'productive interaction' approach.

Contact

Clemens Blümel
Clemens Blümel Acting Head +49 30 2064177-31
Stephan Stahlschmidt
Dr. Stephan Stahlschmidt Acting Head +49 30 2064177-18
Guido Speiser
Dr. Guido Speiser Deputy Head +49 30 2064177-24

Projects

All research department projects

Staff

All research department staff

Publications

All research department publications

Presentations and conferences

All research department presentations and conferences