Publikationen
814 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-555 556-570 571-585 586-600 601-615 616-630 631-645 646-660 661-675 676-690 691-705 706-720 721-735 736-750 751-765 766-780 781-795 796-810 811-814
A comparison of systematic reviews and guideline-based systematic reviews in medical studies.Schniedermann, A. (2021).A comparison of systematic reviews and guideline-based systematic reviews in medical studies. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04199-0 |
One year after the outbreak – Involvement of scientists in the Covid-19 pandemic Findings from a Germany-wide study.Ambrasat, J., & Fabian, G. (2021).One year after the outbreak – Involvement of scientists in the Covid-19 pandemic Findings from a Germany-wide study. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/56r3u |
Citation analysis of Ph.D. theses with data from Scopus and Google Books.Donner, P. (2021).Citation analysis of Ph.D. theses with data from Scopus and Google Books. Scientometrics, 126, 9431-9456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04173-w Abstract
This study investigates the potential of citation analysis of Ph.D. theses to obtain valid and useful early career performance indicators at the level of university departments. For German theses from 1996 to 2018 the suitability of citation data from Scopus and Google Books is studied and found to be sufficient to obtain quantitative estimates of early career researchers’ performance at departmental level in terms of scientific recognition and use of their dissertations as reflected in citations. Scopus and Google Books citations complement each other and have little overlap. Individual theses’ citation counts are much higher for those awarded a dissertation award than others. Departmental level estimates of citation impact agree ... |
Identifying constitutive articles of cumulative dissertation theses by bilingual text similarity. Evaluation of similarity methods on a new short text task.Donner, P. (2021).Identifying constitutive articles of cumulative dissertation theses by bilingual text similarity. Evaluation of similarity methods on a new short text task. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00152 Abstract
Cumulative dissertations are doctoral theses comprised of multiple published articles. For studies of publication activity and citation impact of early career researchers it is important to identify these articles and link them to their associated theses. Using a new benchmark data set, this paper reports on experiments of measuring the bilingual textual similarity between, on the one hand, titles and keywords of doctoral theses, and, on the other hand, articles’ titles and abstracts. The tested methods are cosine similarity and L1 distance in the Vector Space Model (VSM) as baselines, the language-indifferent methods Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) and trigram similarity, and the language-aware methods fastText and Random Indexing (RI)... |
Editors between support and control by the digital infrastructure — Tracing the peer review process with data from an editorial management system.Hartstein, J., & Blümel, C. (2021).Editors between support and control by the digital infrastructure — Tracing the peer review process with data from an editorial management system. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics (6). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2021.747562/full (Abgerufen am: 20.10.2021) (online first). Abstract
Many journals now rely on editorial management systems, which are supposed to support the administration and decision making of editors, while aiming at making the process of communication faster and more transparent to both reviewers and authors. Yet, little is known about how these infrastructures support, stabilize, transform or change existing editorial practices. By exploring process generated data from a publisher’s editorial management system, we investigate the ways by which the digital infrastructure is used and how it represents the different realms of the process of peer review. How does the infrastructure support, strengthen or restrain editorial agency for administrating the process? |
Gastbeitrag: Zur bibliometrischen Messung der internationalen Wissenschaftlermobilität.Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2021).Gastbeitrag: Zur bibliometrischen Messung der internationalen Wissenschaftlermobilität. Wissenschaft Weltoffen: Daten und Fakten zur Internationalität von Studium und Forschung in Deutschland und weltweit 2021. Deutschland: Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst und Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung. |
Kerndatensatz Forschung: Standard für eine harmonisierte Berichtslegung über Forschung.Biesenbender, S. (2021).Kerndatensatz Forschung: Standard für eine harmonisierte Berichtslegung über Forschung. In UniWiND-Koordinierungsstelle Nachwuchsinformationen – UniKoN (Hrsg.), Dr. Unbekannt: Informationsbedarfe, Angebote, Strukturen und Informationslage deutscher Hochschulen und außeruniversitärer Forschungseinrichtungen zur Förderung promovierter Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler (S. 104-108). Freiburg/Jena: werkpost - kommunikation & medien. https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.50154 |
Interview: Sieben Jahre Projektarbeit am Kerndatensatz Forschung.Biesenbender, S. (2021).Interview: Sieben Jahre Projektarbeit am Kerndatensatz Forschung. In UniWiND-Koordinierungsstelle Nachwuchsinformationen – UniKoN (Hrsg.), Dr. Unbekannt: Informationsbedarfe, Angebote, Strukturen und Informationslage deutscher Hochschulen und außeruniversitärer Forschungseinrichtungen zur Förderung promovierter Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler (S. 141-145). Freiburg/Jena: werkpost - kommunikation & medien. https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.50154 |
Analysing Sentiments in Peer Review Reports: Evidence from Two Science Funding Agencies.Luo, J., Feliciani, T., Reinhart, M., Hartstein, J., Das, V., Alabi, O., & Shankar, K. (2021).Analysing Sentiments in Peer Review Reports: Evidence from Two Science Funding Agencies. Quantitative Science Studies. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00156 |
Hochschulreformen, Leistungsbewertungen und berufliche Identität von Professor*innen.Janßen, M., Schimank, U., & Sondermann, A. (2021).Hochschulreformen, Leistungsbewertungen und berufliche Identität von Professor*innen. Eine fächervergleichende qualitative Studie. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33289-1 |
Research Networks Generated by Organizational Structures, Co-Authorships and Citations: A Case Study of German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (Idiv).Qu, Z. (2021).Research Networks Generated by Organizational Structures, Co-Authorships and Citations: A Case Study of German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (Idiv). Open Access Journal of Biogeneric Science and Research, 2021(9). |
The Independence of Research—A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects.Gläser, J., Ash, M., Buenstorf, G., Hopf, D., Hubenschmid, L., ... & Lieb, K. (2021).The Independence of Research—A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects. Minerva, 2021 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09451-8 |
Gizasks: What Is the Most Important Scientific Development of the Last 50 Years?Hesselmann, F. (30. August 2021).Gizasks: What Is the Most Important Scientific Development of the Last 50 Years [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://gizmodo.com/what-is-the-most-important-scientific-development-of-th-1847518361 |
Kontakt

