Publications

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

A study of referencing changes in preprint-publication pairs across multiple fields.

Akbaritabar, A., Stephen, D., & Squazzoni, F. (2022).
A study of referencing changes in preprint-publication pairs across multiple fields. Journal of Informetrics, 16(2), 101258 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101258

International scientific collaboration of post-Soviet countries: a bibliometric analysis.

Matveeva, N., Sterligov, I., & Lovakov, A. (2022).
International scientific collaboration of post-Soviet countries: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 2022( 127), 1583-1607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04274-0

Apache Spark and MLlib-Based Intrusion Detection System or How the Big Data Technologies Can Secure the Data.

Azeroual, O., & Nikiforova, A. (2022).
Apache Spark and MLlib-Based Intrusion Detection System or How the Big Data Technologies Can Secure the Data. Information, 13(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13020058

Datenportal der National Academics Panel Study (Nacaps) - Hochschulspezifische Ergebnisse der Promovierendenbefragungen 2019-2021.

Gottwald, A., & Wegner, A. (2022).
Datenportal der National Academics Panel Study (Nacaps) - Hochschulspezifische Ergebnisse der Promovierendenbefragungen 2019-2021. Berlin: DZHW (nicht zur Veröffentlichung vorgesehen).

Nutzerhandbuch Nacaps-Datenportal.

Wegner, A., & Gottwald, A. (2022).
Nutzerhandbuch Nacaps-Datenportal. Funktionen und Indikatoren im Partnerbereich des Datenportals der National Academics Panel Study. (Version 2.0). Berlin: DZHW.

The rise of the guest editor—Discontinuities of editorship in scholarly publishing.

Knöchelmann, M., Hesselmann, F., Reinhart, M., & Schendzielorz, C. (2022).
The rise of the guest editor—Discontinuities of editorship in scholarly publishing. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.748171
Abstract

Scholarly publishing lives on traditioned terminology that gives meaning to subjects such as authors, inhouse editors and external guest editors, artifacts such as articles, journals, special issues, and collected editions, or practices of acquisition, selection, and review. These subjects, artifacts, and practices ground the constitution of scholarly discourse. And yet, the meaning ascribed to each of these terms shifts, blurs, or is disguised as publishing culture shifts, which becomes manifest in new digital publishing technology, new forms of publishing management, and new forms of scholarly knowledge production. As a result, we may come to over- or underestimate changes in scholarly communication based on traditioned [...]

Untersuchungen zur Datenqualität und Nutzerakzeptanz von Forschungsinformationssystemen.

Azeroual, O. (2022).
Untersuchungen zur Datenqualität und Nutzerakzeptanz von Forschungsinformationssystemen. Framework zur Überwachung und Verbesserung der Qualität von Forschungsinformationen. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36702-2

Conceptualizing, measuring, and developing indicators.

van den Besselaar, P., Mom, C., Cruz-Castro, L., Sanz Menendez, L., & Möller, T. (2021).
Conceptualizing, measuring, and developing indicators. Amsterdam: Teresa Mom consultancy bv.

Researcher independence and funding decisions.

Möller, T. (2021).
Researcher independence and funding decisions. In van den Besselaar, P. et al. (Hrsg.), Conceptualizing, measuring, and developing indicators. (S. 110-121). Amsterdam: Teresa Mom consultancy bv.

Hochschulen als Partner – Strategien für den Feldzugang einer Längsschnittstudie über Promovierende und Promovierte.

Adrian, D. (2021).
Hochschulen als Partner – Strategien für den Feldzugang einer Längsschnittstudie über Promovierende und Promovierte. Das Hochschulwesen, 2021(5+6), 164-170.
Abstract

Recent years show an increasing demand for reliable data about Early Career Researchers expressed by Higher Education Institutions as well as political decision makers. At the same time it has become more difficult for empirical higher education researchers who produce such data to get access to the field. For many of these studies the support of HEI´s is needed to systematically reach the target groups. However, HEI´s often react reluctantly to corresponding inquiries by researchers, because of the effort involved and diverging expectations regarding the studies’ thematic priorities and the presentation of results. The article outlines and assesses in this context the strategic approach of the National Academics Panel Study (Nacaps).

Standard-relevant publications: Evidence, processes and influencing factors.

Blind, K., & Fenton, A. (2021).
Standard-relevant publications: Evidence, processes and influencing factors. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04210-8
Abstract

This paper introduces the concept of standard-relevant publications, complementary to standard-essential patents and framed by the concept of knowledge utilization. By analyzing the reference lists of the around 20,000 standards released by ISO, authors of scientific papers cited in standards who are working at German institutions were identified. The institutions include universities, independent research societies, ministerial research institutes and companies. Almost thirty interviews were conducted with the most-cited of these authors. The interviews addressed the processes by which scientific publications come to be referenced in standards, and the motivations, the barriers and the effects of this.

Quantitative studies of science in Germany.

Blümel, C., & Gauch, S. (2021).
Quantitative studies of science in Germany. Scientometrics, 126(12) (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04203-7

A comparison of systematic reviews and guideline-based systematic reviews in medical studies.

Schniedermann, A. (2021).
A comparison of systematic reviews and guideline-based systematic reviews in medical studies. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04199-0

One year after the outbreak – Involvement of scientists in the Covid-19 pandemic Findings from a Germany-wide study.

Ambrasat, J., & Fabian, G. (2021).
One year after the outbreak – Involvement of scientists in the Covid-19 pandemic Findings from a Germany-wide study. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/56r3u

Erkenntnisgewinn durch Praxis: Empirische Einblicke in die neuen Wege der Doktorand*innenausbildung.

Hendriks, B., & Lietz, A. (2021).
Erkenntnisgewinn durch Praxis: Empirische Einblicke in die neuen Wege der Doktorand*innenausbildung. Forschung: Politik - Strategie - Management, 14(1+2), 6-9.

Contact

Clemens Blümel
Clemens Blümel Acting Head +49 30 2064177-31
Stephan Stahlschmidt
Dr. Stephan Stahlschmidt Acting Head +49 30 2064177-18
Peter van den Besselaar
Prof. Dr. Peter van den Besselaar Acting Head +49 30 2064177-0
Guido Speiser
Dr. Guido Speiser Deputy Head +49 30 2064177-24

Projects

All research area projects

Staff

All research area staff

Publications

All research area publications

Presentations and conferences

All research area presentations and conferences