Open Science - a loosely coupled discourse? Comparing Open Science and Open Innovation from a bibliometric point of view.
Blümel, C., & Beng, F. (2018).
Open Science - a loosely coupled discourse? Comparing Open Science and Open Innovation from a bibliometric point of view.
In STI 2018 Conference Proceedings. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. 12-14 September 2018, Leiden, The Netherlands.
|
Trade Journals in Bibliometric Databases and Their Influences on Indicator Calculations.
Beng, F. (2018).
Trade Journals in Bibliometric Databases and Their Influences on Indicator Calculations.
In STI 2018 Conference Proceedings. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. 12-14 September 2018, Leiden, The Netherlands.
|
Supplementing citations to PhD theses with citations from Google.
Donner, P. (2018).
Supplementing citations to PhD theses with citations from Google.
In R. Costas, T. Franssen & A. Yegros-Yegros, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (465-471). Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden, Netherlands.
|
From science to technology : The value of knowledge from the business sector.
Qu, Z. (2018).
From science to technology : The value of knowledge from the business sector.
In STI 2018 Conference Proceedings. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. 12-14 September 2018, Leiden, The Netherlands.
|
Transfer of formal knowledge through international scientific mobility - introduction of a network-based bibliometric method.
Aman, V. (2018).
Transfer of formal knowledge through international scientific mobility - introduction of a network-based bibliometric method.
In STI 2018 Conference Proceedings (S.545-552). Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University.
|
Does the Scopus author ID suffice to track scientific international mobility? A case study based on Leibniz laureates.
Aman, V. (2018).
Does the Scopus author ID suffice to track scientific international mobility? A case study based on Leibniz laureates.
Scientometrics, Volume 117(Issue 2), 705-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2895-3
|
Electromobility Research in Germany and China: Structural Differences.
Qu, Z. (2018).
Electromobility Research in Germany and China: Structural Differences.
Scientometrics, 117(1), 473-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2873-9
|
Open Science - a loosely coupled discourse? Results from scientometric analysis In STI 2018 Conference Proceedings.
Blümel, C., & Beng, F. (2018).
Open Science - a loosely coupled discourse? Results from scientometric analysis In STI 2018 Conference Proceedings.
In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (S. 369-377). Leiden, The Netherlands.
|
Quantitative User Valuation Studies - The case of Altmetrics.
Gauch, S., & Blümel, C. (2018).
Quantitative User Valuation Studies - The case of Altmetrics.
In Conference Proceedings. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (S. 255-266). Leiden, The Netherlands.
|
Nachwuchssorgen - alles eine Frage der Vereinbarkeit?
Banavas, T., Oppermann, A., & Lange, J. (2018).
Nachwuchssorgen - alles eine Frage der Vereinbarkeit?
news - GENDER | POLITIK | UNIVERSITÄT. Fehler im System. Warum es so wenige Frauen in der Wissenschaft gibt, 1/2018. Koordinationsbüro für Frauenförderung und Gleichstellung, Technische Universität Berlin, 26-29.
|
Datenprofiling und Datenbereinigung in Forschungsinformationssystemen.
Azeroual, O., / Abuosba, M. (2018).
Datenprofiling und Datenbereinigung in Forschungsinformationssystemen.
In HTW Berlin & M. Knaut (Hrsg.), Kreativität + X = Innovation, 8/2018, S.16-25. Berlin: BWV - Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag GmbH.
|
Nach der Bewertung ist vor der Bewertung – Sichtbarkeit und Emotionalität als verbindende Elemente von Bewertungsprozessen.
Reinhart, M., Krüger, A., & Hesselmann, F. (2018).
Nach der Bewertung ist vor der Bewertung – Sichtbarkeit und Emotionalität als verbindende Elemente von Bewertungsprozessen.
In S. Nicolae, M. Endreß, O. Berli & D. Bischur (Hrsg.), (Be)Werten. Beiträge zur sozialen Konstruktion von Wertigkeit. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21763-1_6
|
A new bibliometric approach to measure knowledge transfer of internationally mobile scientists.
Aman, V. (2018).
A new bibliometric approach to measure knowledge transfer of internationally mobile scientists.
Scientometrics, Volume 117, Issue 1, 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2864-x
Abstract
This study introduces a new bibliometric approach to study the effects of international scientific mobility on knowledge transfer. It is based on an analysis of internationally mobile and non-internationally mobile German scientists publishing in journals that are indexed in Scopus. Using bibliometric data such co-authored articles, references and lexical abstract terms from the Scopus database, a method is presented that is based on cosine similarity to measure the similarity of the knowledge base of authors and their co-authors. This quantifiable method is capable of revealing potential knowledge transfer between internationally mobile scientists and different types of co-authors.
|
Patent Research in a Period of Industry Transformation: A Focus on E-mobility.
Qu, Z. (2018).
Patent Research in a Period of Industry Transformation: A Focus on E-mobility.
In Jibu, M. (Hrsg.), Scientometrics. IntechOpen. ISBN 978-953-51-6239-1. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75579
|
Legitimes Sprechen über Innovation? Die Nutzung von Innovationsverständnissen im wissenschaftspolitischen Feld.
Blümel, C. (2018).
Legitimes Sprechen über Innovation? Die Nutzung von Innovationsverständnissen im wissenschaftspolitischen Feld.
Zeitschrift für Diskursforschung , Beiheft,, Ausgabe 01, Jahr 2018, 71-102. https://doi.org/10.3262/ZFDB1801071
|
