Publications
546 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-546
Evaluating Scientific Impact of Research Infrastructures: The Role of Current Research Information Systems.Fabre, R., Egret, D., Schöpfel, J., & Azeroual, O. (2021).Evaluating Scientific Impact of Research Infrastructures: The Role of Current Research Information Systems. Quantitative Science Studies (online first). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00111 |
"Problematisch wird es dort, wo sich Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft berühren": Interview mit Felicitas Heßelmann zu Fehlverhalten in der Wissenschaft.Heßelmann, F. (19. Januar 2021)."Problematisch wird es dort, wo sich Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft berühren": Interview mit Felicitas Heßelmann zu Fehlverhalten in der Wissenschaft [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://lisa.gerda-henkel-stiftung.de/fehlverhalten |
Manual & Documentation of Doctoral Degree and Career Dataset (DDC) – first version.Jakob, T., Eric, I., Asgeir, S., Thomas, F., Jeroen, v. H., ... & Daniel, W.-S. (2021).Manual & Documentation of Doctoral Degree and Career Dataset (DDC) – first version. Hannover: Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4446431 |
The Competent Bibliometrician–A Guided Tour through the Scholarly and Practitioner Literature.Petersohn, S. (2020).The Competent Bibliometrician–A Guided Tour through the Scholarly and Practitioner Literature. In Ball, R. (Hrsg.), Handbook Bibliometrics (S. 485-496). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Saur. Abstract
Repeated calls for responsible research metrics and professional codes of conduct in evaluative bibliometrics highlight the need to investigate which qualifications and competencies enable a proficient application of bibliometric methods and indicators. Taking competence research as a point of departure, this chapter delineates salient dimensions of professional competence in bibliometric research evaluation by reviewing a selected subset of the literature. The reviewed literature focuses on handbooks, monographs, and scholarly and practitioner articles that introduce theory and methodology of bibliometrics and showcase applications to scholars and practitioners mainly outside of the scientometric research community. |
Cycles of Invisibility: The Limits of Transparency in Dealing with Scientific Misconduct.Hesselmann, F., & Reinhart, M. (2020).Cycles of Invisibility: The Limits of Transparency in Dealing with Scientific Misconduct. Social Studies of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720975201 Abstract
Sanctions for plagiarism, falsification and fabrication in research are primarily symbolic. This paper investigates sanctions for scientific misconduct and their preceding investigation processes as visible and legitimate symbols. Using three different data sources (retraction notices, expert interviews, and a survey of scientists), we show that sanctions for scientific misconduct operate within a cycle of visibility, in which sanctions are highly visible, while investigation and decision-making procedures remain mostly invisible. This corresponds to high levels of acceptance of sanctions in the scientific community, but a low acceptance of the respective authorities. Such a punitiveness in turn exacerbates confidentiality concerns, so that |
Validation of the Astro dataset clustering solutions with external data.Donner, P. (2020).Validation of the Astro dataset clustering solutions with external data. Scientometrics, in print. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03780-3 Abstract
We conduct an independent cluster validation study on published clustering solutions of a research testbed corpus, the Astro dataset of publication records from astronomy and astrophysics. We extend the dataset by collecting external validation data serving as proxies for the latent structure of the corpus. Specifically, we collect (1) grant funding information related to the publications, (2) data on topical special issues, (3) on specific journals’ internal topic classifications and (4) usage data from the main online bibliographic database of the discipline. The latter three types of data are newly introduced for the purpose of clustering validation and the rationale for using them for this task is set out. |
Comparison of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions databases.Stahlschmidt, S., & Stephen, D. (2020).Comparison of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions databases. Report to Kompetenzzentrum Bibliometrie. Hannover: DZHW.
|
Current research information systems and institutional repositories: From data ingestion to convergence and merger.Schöpfel, J., & Azeroual, O. (2020).Current research information systems and institutional repositories: From data ingestion to convergence and merger. In Baker, D., & Ellis, L. (Hrsg.), Future Directions in Digital Information, 1st Edition: Predictions, Practice, Participation, 11/2020, (S. 19-37). Sawston, Cambridge: Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822144-0.00002-1 |
Contact




