Publikationen
855 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-555 556-570 571-585 586-600 601-615 616-630 631-645 646-660 661-675 676-690 691-705 706-720 721-735 736-750 751-765 766-780 781-795 796-810 811-825 826-840 841-855 856-855
Support structures to facilitate the dissemination and implementation of a national standard for research information – the German case of the Research Core Dataset.Biesenbender, S., & Herwig, S. (2019).Support structures to facilitate the dissemination and implementation of a national standard for research information – the German case of the Research Core Dataset. Procedia Computer Science, 146, 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.088 |
Using Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) to showcase national and institutional research (potential): research information systems in the context of Open Science.Biesenbender, S., Petersohn, S., & Thiedig, C. (2019).Using Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) to showcase national and institutional research (potential): research information systems in the context of Open Science. Procedia Computer Science, 146, 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.089 |
Eine post-positivistische Betrachtung der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung.Rungius, C., & Weller, C. (2019).Eine post-positivistische Betrachtung der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung. In M. Barbehön et al. (Hrsg.), Was bedeutet Interpretieren? Interpretative Verfahren der Politikforschung, Sonderband der Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer. |
Was gewinnen wir durch Open Science und Open Innovation?Blümel, C., Fecher, B., & Leimüller, G. (2019).Was gewinnen wir durch Open Science und Open Innovation? Essen: Stifterverband. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1880055 |
What are clinician scientists expected to do? The undefined space for professionalizable work in translational biomedicine.Hendriks, B., Simons, A., & Reinhart, M. (2019).What are clinician scientists expected to do? The undefined space for professionalizable work in translational biomedicine. Minerva (57), 213-257, Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09367-4 Abstract
Clinician scientists have gained institutional support in the era of translational research, as the key solution to closing the ‘translational gap’ between biomedical research and medical practice. However, clinician scientists remain an ‘endangered species’ in search of a secure niche, while new grants and training programs attempt to counteract their measurable decline in numbers over the past decades. Our study asks how an occupational space for clinician scientists is currently situated between the politics of translation, professional dynamics, and the specialization of academic disciplines. We interviewed clinician scientists, their adjacent professions—clinicians and biomedical researchers—, and contrast their views with expectations |
Making sense of social interaction: Emotional coherence drives semantic integration as assessed by event-related potentials.Schauenburg, G., Conrad, M., von Scheve, Chr., Barber, H., Ambrasat, J., Aryani, A., & Schröder, T. (2019).Making sense of social interaction: Emotional coherence drives semantic integration as assessed by event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia. (online first). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.002 |
Der Kerndatensatz Forschung: Aufbau, Anwendung und die Rolle der Bibliothek.Thiedig, C. (2018).Der Kerndatensatz Forschung: Aufbau, Anwendung und die Rolle der Bibliothek. GMS Medizin — Bibliothek — Information, 18(3) 2018. https://doi.org/10.3205/mbi000421 |
Does the Winner Take it All? Increasing Inequality in Scientific Authorship.Rauhut, H., Winter, F., & Johann, D. (2018).Does the Winner Take it All? Increasing Inequality in Scientific Authorship. In M. C. Buchmann & R. A. Scott (Hrsg.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Hoboken: Wiley Online. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0459 |
Text data mining and data quality management for research information systems in the context of open data and open science.Azeroual, O., Saake, G., Abuosba, M., & Schöpfel, J. (2018).Text data mining and data quality management for research information systems in the context of open data and open science. In ESI-CNRST, N. Ibnlkhayat (Hrsg.), Proceedings of 3rd International Colloquium on Open Access - Open Access to Science Foundations, Issues and Dynamics (29-46), 28-30 November 2018, Rabat-Morocco, 11/2018. |
Using Argumentation Visualization to Foster Transparency of Development Processes: An Evaluation Study.Riechert, M., Biesenbender, S., Becker, J., & Zarnekow, R. (2018).Using Argumentation Visualization to Foster Transparency of Development Processes: An Evaluation Study. Research Papers in Information Systems Management, Band 19, 1-30, Berlin: Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin. http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-7147 |
Academic coaching and decision analysis: Ways of deciding whether to pursue an academic career.Morais, A.S., & Hariskos, W. (2018).Academic coaching and decision analysis: Ways of deciding whether to pursue an academic career. PLoS ONE 13(11): e0206961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206961 |
How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions.Mayer, S. J., & Rathmann, J. M. K. (2018).How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2933-1 |
Kontakt
