Publications

The social sciences and their publishers: Publication, reception and changing meaning of German monographs.

• Christoph Thiedig

Thiedig, C. (2019).
The social sciences and their publishers: Publication, reception and changing meaning of German monographs. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 2014-2019). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

How to interpret algorithmically constructed topical structures of research specialties? A case study comparing an internal and an external mapping of the topical structure of invasion biology.

• Theresa Velden

Held, M., & Velden, T. (2019).
How to interpret algorithmically constructed topical structures of research specialties? A case study comparing an internal and an external mapping of the topical structure of invasion biology. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 1933-1939). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

Internationally mobile scientists as knowledge transmitters - A lexical-based approach to detect knowledge transfer.

• Valeria Aman

Aman, V. (2019).
Internationally mobile scientists as knowledge transmitters - A lexical-based approach to detect knowledge transfer. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 2199-2208). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

Punishing crimes of the mind: Sanctions for scientific misconduct as a case for the cultural theory of punishment.

• Felicitas Heßelmann

Hesselmann, F. (2019).
Punishing crimes of the mind: Sanctions for scientific misconduct as a case for the cultural theory of punishment. Theoretical Criminology, 23 (4), 527–544.

How practicioners between bench and bedside evaluate biomedical translation.

Simons, A., Hendriks, B., Reinhart, M., & Ahmed, F. (2019).
How practicioners between bench and bedside evaluate biomedical translation. SocArXiv [preprint]. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/srcma

Wissenschaft und berufliche Praxis in der Graduiertenausbildung. Erste Befunde aus der Begleitforschung.

• Christophe Heger

Hendriks, B., Heger, C., & Hornbostel, S. (2019).
Wissenschaft und berufliche Praxis in der Graduiertenausbildung. Erste Befunde aus der Begleitforschung. Berlin: DZHW.

Chinese super science cyborgs: racialised narratives of research misconduct.

• Felicitas Heßelmann

Hesselmann, F. (2019).
Chinese super science cyborgs: racialised narratives of research misconduct. [Blogeintrag]. Abgerufen von https://www.identitiesjournal.com/blog-articles/chinese-super-science-cyborgs-racialised-narratives-of-research-misconduct.

Rolle und Aufgaben von Bibliotheken im Umfeld des Kerndatensatz Forschung (KDSF).

• Sophie Biesenbender (geb. Schmitt)

Biesenbender, S., & Tobias, R. (2019).
Rolle und Aufgaben von Bibliotheken im Umfeld des Kerndatensatz Forschung (KDSF). ABI Technik, 39(2), 104-111. http://doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2019-2003

Kursorische Bemerkungen zu Autorschaft.

Hornbostel, S. (2019).
Kursorische Bemerkungen zu Autorschaft. In Fröhlich, M., Lembcke, O. W., & Weber-Stein, F. (Hrsg.), Universitas. Ideen, Individuen und Institutionen in Politik und Wissenschaft. Festschrift für Klaus Dicke (S. 549-561). Nomos: Baden-Baden.

Außenpolitikberatung als post-positivistischer Forschungsgegenstand: Zur Konstitution wissenschaftlicher Politikberatung in der Politikwissenschaft.

Rungius, C., & Weller, C. (2019).
Außenpolitikberatung als post-positivistischer Forschungsgegenstand: Zur Konstitution wissenschaftlicher Politikberatung in der Politikwissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

The Perception of Scientific Authorship Across Domains.

Johann, D., & Mayer, S. J. (2019).
The Perception of Scientific Authorship Across Domains. Minerva, 57(2), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9363-3

Too sophisticated even for highly educated survey respondents? A qualitative assessment of indirect question formats for sensitive questions.

Jerke, J., Johann, D., Rauhut, H., & Thomas, K. (2019).
Too sophisticated even for highly educated survey respondents? A qualitative assessment of indirect question formats for sensitive questions. Survey Research Methods 13(3), 319-351.

Quality of Research Information in RIS Databases: A Multidimensional Approach.

• Otmane Azeroual

Azeroual, O., Saake, G., Abuosba, M., & Schöpfel, J. (2019).
Quality of Research Information in RIS Databases: A Multidimensional Approach. In Abramowicz, W., & Corchuelo, Rafael (Hrsg.), 22nd International Conference on Business Information Systems, BIS 2019, Seville, Spain, June 26–28, 2019, 5/2019 (S. 337-349).

Evaluations as value-measurement links: Exploring metrics and meanings in science.

• Felicitas Heßelmann

Hesselmann, F., & Schendzielorz, C. (2019).
Evaluations as value-measurement links: Exploring metrics and meanings in science. In Brighenti, A.M., Theorising Measures, Rankings and Metrics, Special Issue for Social Science Information, (S. 282-300).

Applying Crossref and Unpaywall information to identify gold, hidden gold, hybrid and delayed Open Access publications in the KB corpus. Report to Kompetenzzentrum Bibliometrie.

• Stephan Stahlschmidt

Akbaritabar, A., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2019).
Applying Crossref and Unpaywall information to identify gold, hidden gold, hybrid and delayed Open Access publications in the KB corpus. Report to Kompetenzzentrum Bibliometrie. DZHW: Berlin/Hannover. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/sdzft