Publications

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality.

Stephen, D. (2023).
Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality. In L. Waltman, K. H. Lai, B. Murat, J. Wang, V. Weimer, E. Noyons, & M. Luwel (Hrsg.), 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023). Leiden, Netherlands: orvium.io. https://doi.org/10.55835/644245cb8e703ddb4dc07eda

Market selection and learning under model misspecification.

Bottazzi, G., Giachini, D., & Ottaviani, M. (2023).
Market selection and learning under model misspecification. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188923001458 (Abgerufen am: 12.09.2023).
Abstract

The paper explores market selection in an Arrow-Debreu economy with complete markets where agents learn over misspecified models. Standard Bayesian learning loses formal justification, and biased learning processes may provide a selection advantage. The ecology of traders in the market affects selection dynamics and long-run asset valuation. Model misspecification makes it difficult to rank learning behaviors based on survival prospects. Prediction averaging has an advantage when the true data generating process belongs to the same family of models, but this advantage disappears when the true model belongs to a more general class. Rules guaranteeing survival exploit imitative mechanisms.

What is research funding, how does it influence research, and how is it recorded? Key dimensions of variation.

Thelwall, M., Simrick, S., Viney, I., & van den Besselaar, P. (2023).
What is research funding, how does it influence research, and how is it recorded? Key dimensions of variation. Scientometrics , 128, 6085-6106.
Abstract

Evaluating the effects of some or all academic research funding is difficult because of the many different and overlapping sources, types, and scopes. It is therefore important to identify the key aspects of research funding so that funders and others assessing its value do not overlook them. This article outlines 18 dimensions through which funding varies substantially, as well as three funding records facets.

FAIRification of CRIS: A Review.

Azeroual, O., Schöpfel, J., Pölönen, J., & Nikiforova, A. (2023).
FAIRification of CRIS: A Review. In F. Coenen, A. Fred, J. Bernardino, E. Masciari, & J. Filipe (Hrsg.), Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43471-6_13

Defining Transparency: A Functional Approach.

Cruz Romero, R. (2023).
Defining Transparency: A Functional Approach. JeDEM - EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 15(1), 219-242. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v15i1.714
Abstract

This reflection piece seeks to tackle this blurriness and advance the concept’s analytical precision by presenting and discussing transparency’s main dimensions, as well as its framing within the scholarly body of good governance, democracy, and development. To do so, the reflection paper presents a novel approach; to define transparency in the form of a function (which places transparency in relation to, and as a function) of its two constituting dimensions: a) information (timely and qualitative), and b) accountability mechanisms (namely, a free media environment and legitimate accountability channels).

The Field-Specificity of Open Data Practices.

Velden, T., & Tcypina, A. (2023).
The Field-Specificity of Open Data Practices. In International Conference on Science (Hrsg.), 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023). Leiden, Niederlande: ovium.io. https://doi.org/10.55835/64b14ef741aa5b443685f9d3
Abstract

Increasingly, researchers are expected to make their research data openly available. However, scientific fields differ in their research practices and norms for sharing research data. We provide quantitative evidence of differences in data practices and the public sharing of research data at a granularity of field-specificity that is rarely reported in open data surveys. Based on a survey of 8,822 researchers at German Universities, we find considerable variation, within and across disciplines, of data practices and rates of open data sharing. Our findings underline that in order to evaluate rates of public data sharing, a better understanding of the embedding of public data sharing into field-specific research practices is needed.

Predictive Analytics intelligent decision-making framework and testing it through sentiment analysis on Twitter data.

Azeroual, O., Nacheva, R., Nikiforova, A., Störl, U., & Fraisse, A. (2023).
Predictive Analytics intelligent decision-making framework and testing it through sentiment analysis on Twitter data. CompSysTech '23: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, 2023, 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3606305.3606309

10 Ethical Dimensions of Research Information Management: A New Challenge for Information Professionals.

Schöpfel, J., & Azeroual, O. (2023).
10 Ethical Dimensions of Research Information Management: A New Challenge for Information Professionals. In M. C. Fombad, C. T. Chisita, O. B. Onyancha, & M. K. Minishi-Majanja (Hrsg.), Information Services for a Sustainable Society: Current Developments in an Era of Information Disorder (S. 150-165). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Saur. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110772753-012

Are there gender differences in the number of research proposals submitted?

Möller, T. (8. August 2023).
Are there gender differences in the number of research proposals submitted [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://www.granted-project.eu/blogpost-9-are-there-gender-differences-in-the-number-of-research-proposals-submitted/

Overlooked Aspects of Data Governance: Workflow Framework For Enterprise Data Deduplication.

Azeroual, O., Nikiforova, A., & Sha, K. (2023).
Overlooked Aspects of Data Governance: Workflow Framework For Enterprise Data Deduplication. 2023 International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Communication, Networking and Services (ICCNS), Valencia, Spain, 19-22 June 2023., 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCNS58795.2023.10193478

Determinants of cognitive mobility.

Mom, C., Möller, T., & van den Besselaar, P. (2023).
Determinants of cognitive mobility. In ISSI (Hrsg.), Proceedings of ISSI 2023 - the 19th International Conference of the International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2023). Bloomington, United States: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.

Confounding cross-correlation: A meta-analysis of the association between citations and altmetrics.

Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2023).
Confounding cross-correlation: A meta-analysis of the association between citations and altmetrics. In ISSI (Hrsg.), Proceedings of ISSI 2023 – the 19th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (S. 449-454). Bloomington, United States: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.

Mining the History Sections of Wikipedia Articles on Science and Technology.

Kircheis, W., Schmidt, M., Simons, A., Stein, B., & Potthast, M. (2023).
Mining the History Sections of Wikipedia Articles on Science and Technology. 23rd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2023), 23 (online first).

QuaMedFo - Qualitätsmaße zur Evaluierung medizinischer Forschung: Projektbericht.

Biesenbender, S. (2023).
QuaMedFo - Qualitätsmaße zur Evaluierung medizinischer Forschung: Projektbericht. Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.2314/KXP:1871786746

Medical articles in questionable journals are less impactful than those in non-questionable journals but still extensively cited.

Stephen, D. (2023).
Medical articles in questionable journals are less impactful than those in non-questionable journals but still extensively cited. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04763-w

Contact

Clemens Blümel
Clemens Blümel Acting Head +49 30 2064177-31
Stephan Stahlschmidt
Dr. Stephan Stahlschmidt Acting Head +49 30 2064177-18
Guido Speiser
Dr. Guido Speiser Deputy Head +49 30 2064177-24

Projects

All research department projects

Staff

All research department staff

Publications

All research department publications

Presentations and conferences

All research department presentations and conferences