What Synthetic Biology Aims At: Review Articles as Sites for Constructing and Narrating an Emerging Field.
Blümel, C. (2020).
What Synthetic Biology Aims At: Review Articles as Sites for Constructing and Narrating an Emerging Field.
In Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook. [preprint]. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/npfkv
|
Data Quality as a Critical Success Factor for User Acceptance of Research Information Systems.
Azeroual, O., Saake, G., Abuosba, M., & Schöpfel, J. (2020).
Data Quality as a Critical Success Factor for User Acceptance of Research Information Systems.
Data, 5/2020, 35, Basel, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5020035
|
Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda.
Blümel, C., & Schniedermann, A. (2020).
Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda.
Scientometrics, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03431-7
|
Mapping and semantic interoperability of the German RCD data model with the Europe-wide accepted CERIF.
Azeroual, O., & Herbig, N. (2020).
Mapping and semantic interoperability of the German RCD data model with the Europe-wide accepted CERIF.
Information Services and Use, 4/2020, 1-24, Netherlands: IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-200076
|
Influence of Information Quality via Implemented German RCD Standard in Research Information Systems.
Azeroual, O., Schöpfel, J., & Ivanovic, D. (2020).
Influence of Information Quality via Implemented German RCD Standard in Research Information Systems.
Data, 5/2020, 30. Basel, Switzerland: MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5020030
|
Wettbewerb um Forschungsmittel. Mangelhaft, mittelmäßig oder exzellent: Was kommt raus beim Peer Review?
Hornbostel, S. (2020).
Wettbewerb um Forschungsmittel. Mangelhaft, mittelmäßig oder exzellent: Was kommt raus beim Peer Review?
Forschung & Lehre, 3/20, 206-207. Bonn: Deutscher Hochschulverband.
|
International Joint Research Programming.
Flink, T. (2020).
International Joint Research Programming.
In Young, M., Flink, T., & Dall, E. (Hrsg.), Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project (S. 254-275). Berlin, Prag, Wien: Selbstverlag.
|
SESAME - a synchrotron light source in the Middle East: an international research infrastructure in the making.
Rungius, C. (2020).
SESAME - a synchrotron light source in the Middle East: an international research infrastructure in the making.
In Young, M., Flink, T., & Dall, E. (Hrsg.), Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project (S. 216-253). Berlin, Prag, Wien: Selbstverlag.
|
Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project.
Young, M., Flink, T., & Dall. E. (2020).
Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project.
Berlin, Prag, Wien: Selbstverlag.
|
Fragmentierte Sichtbarkeiten: Visualität, Sichtbarkeit und Unsichtbarkeit beim Umgang mit wissenschaftlichem Fehlverhalten.
Hesselmann, F., & Reinhart, M. (2020).
Fragmentierte Sichtbarkeiten: Visualität, Sichtbarkeit und Unsichtbarkeit beim Umgang mit wissenschaftlichem Fehlverhalten.
Kriminologisches Journal, 52(1), 6-20.
|
Indikatorenbasierte Berichterstattung zu Promovierenden - Ziele, Referenzen und Erläuterungen der Indikatoren und Kernziffern im Datenportal der National Academics Panel Study.
Wegner, A., Seifert, M., & Geils, M. (2020).
Indikatorenbasierte Berichterstattung zu Promovierenden - Ziele, Referenzen und Erläuterungen der Indikatoren und Kernziffern im Datenportal der National Academics Panel Study.
|
Datenportal der National Academics Panel Study (Nacaps) - Ergebnisse der ersten Promovierendenbefragung 2019.
Geils, M., Seifert, M., & Wegner, A. (2020).
Datenportal der National Academics Panel Study (Nacaps) - Ergebnisse der ersten Promovierendenbefragung 2019.
|
Comparing institutional-level bibliometric research performance indicator values based on different affiliation disambiguation systems.
Donner, P., Rimmert, C., & van Eck, N.J. (2020).
Comparing institutional-level bibliometric research performance indicator values based on different affiliation disambiguation systems.
Quantitative Science Studies, Volume 1 Issue 1, MIT Press, 150-170.
Abstract
The present study is an evaluation of three frequently used institution name disambiguation systems. The Web of Science normalized institution names and Organization Enhanced system and the Scopus Affiliation ID system are tested against a complete, independent institution disambiguation system for a sample of German public sector research organizations. The independent system is used as the gold standard in the evaluations that we perform. We study the coverage of the disambiguation systems and, in particular, the differences in a number of commonly used bibliometric indicators. The key finding is that for the sample institutions, the studied systems provide bibliometric indicator values that have only a limited accuracy. [...]
|
Performance and Structures of the German Science System 2020.
Stephen, D., Stahlschmidt, S., & Hinze, S. (2020).
Performance and Structures of the German Science System 2020.
In Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) (Hrsg.), Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 5-2020, Berlin: Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI).
|
The Valuation of Online Science Communication: A Study Into the Scholarly Discourses of Altmetrics and Their Reception.
Blümel, C., & Gauch, S. (2020).
The Valuation of Online Science Communication: A Study Into the Scholarly Discourses of Altmetrics and Their Reception.
Social Sciences Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3539133
|
