Discipline-based knowledge transfer practices: expectations, practices, and effects of knowledge transfer in a cross-disciplinary perspective (DiTraP)

Start of the project: 2022-May-01 - End of the project: 2025-Apr-30

In this research project, we investigate discipline-based practices of knowledge transfer that emerge from the possible tension between discipline-inherent logics of research and increased expectations in terms of relevance and knowledge transfer directed at science. We want to elaborate how these expectations are translated into disciplinary practices. More specifically, we elucidate the expectations, practices, and effects of knowledge transfer in a cross-disciplinary perspective:

  • Which conceptions of knowledge transfer can be identified in the different disciplines? Are there terminological and conceptual differences across disciplines or between science and science policy?
  • What expectations do scientists perceive with regard to knowledge transfer activities and how do they position themselves in response?
  • Which epistemic conditions promote and which prevent knowledge transfer activities, and which challenges and obstacles are associated with these activities in the different disciplines?
  • What prevents academics from participating in knowledge transfer activities and what limits to knowledge transfer exist? Are there conflicts with other central elements of research, e.g. research quality, or a perceived risk to the research process due to a magnified application orientation?
  • In what form do knowledge transfer practices take place and at which stages of the research does the integration of knowledge happen? Which of these practices are deliberately labelled as knowledge transfer in alignment with the overarching goal of transferring knowledge?
  • Which effects do the translation and integration of knowledge transfer produce at the level of knowledge production and discipline-specific research practices (e.g. effects on publication behaviour, career or (foreseeable) long-term effects through ex ante impact assessments)?

Using a mixed-methods design that combines statistically representative methods and qualitative in-depth analyses, the project will examine in a rigorous cross-disciplinary perspective how different disciplines integrate the requirement for knowledge transfer into their research practices and the effect these expectations have on the production of knowledge across disciplines.

The aim of the project is to explain how and why disciplines react differently to knowledge transfer requirements and develop specific knowledge transfer practices. An analytical distinction is made between the conceptual level (perceptions of requirements, expectations of knowledge transfer and the knowledge transfer concepts involved) and the research practice level (integration and translation of knowledge transfer activities at different points in the research process). At both levels a central goal is to identify knowledge transfer obstacles and barriers that arise from the tension between disciplinary logic and knowledge transfer requirements. At the same time, potentials are to be tapped that could originate, for example, from alternative knowledge transfer concepts or practices.

Show more Show less
Publications

On epistemic properties and field-specific logics in the study of knowledge transfer: Empirical evidence on researchers’ productive interactions from a nationwide survey in Germany.

Janßen, M., & Just, A. (2023).
On epistemic properties and field-specific logics in the study of knowledge transfer: Empirical evidence on researchers’ productive interactions from a nationwide survey in Germany. 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023). https://dapp.orvium.io/deposits/6442ca5b4c613a1222893e2d/view, https://dapp.orvium.io/deposits/6442ca5b4c613a1222893e2d/view (Abgerufen am: 04.10.2023).
Abstract

Researchers are increasingly expected to engage in knowledge transfer (KT), but often the specific expectations remain unclear. To approach the research object of KT, to map existing engagement and to identify barriers to KT, it is essential to include field-specific, discipline-based, and epistemic practice perspectives. Drawing on data from the 2019/2020 Science Survey, we demonstrate the necessity of these perspectives while incorporating the 'productive interaction' approach.

Presentations

Erwartungen, Praktiken und Herausforderungen des Wissenstransfers – Ergebnisse einer fächervergleichenden Befragung unter Wissenschaftler*innen an deutschen Hochschulen.

Janßen, M. (2024, März).
Erwartungen, Praktiken und Herausforderungen des Wissenstransfers – Ergebnisse einer fächervergleichenden Befragung unter Wissenschaftler*innen an deutschen Hochschulen. Vortrag im Rahmen der Ad-hoc-Gruppe „Transfer als gesellschaftliche Verantwortung der (Erziehungs-) Wissenschaft?“ auf dem Kongress Krisen und Transformationen. 29. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.

On epistemic properties & field-specific logics in the study of knowledge transfer: methodological challenges & initial results.

Janßen, M. (2023, November).
On epistemic properties & field-specific logics in the study of knowledge transfer: methodological challenges & initial results. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 4S 2023, The Society for Social Studies of Science (4S), Honolulu, USA.

Wissenstransfer.

Janßen, M. (2023).
Wissenstransfer. Stellungnahme im Rahmen des Lunchtalks der Transfer Unit: Forschung trifft Praxis: Wie lassen sich Begriffe für die Kommunikation wissenschaftlichen Wissens definieren und systematisieren?, Wissenschaft im Dialog & Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin.

On epistemic properties and field-specific logics in the study of knowledge transfer: Empirical evidence on researchers’ productive interactions from a nationwide survey in Germany.

Janßen, M., & Just, A. (2023, September).
On epistemic properties and field-specific logics in the study of knowledge transfer: Empirical evidence on researchers’ productive interactions from a nationwide survey in Germany. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023), Leiden, Niederlande.

On epistemic properties and field-specific logics - Exploring the potential of STS for the study of discipline-based knowledge transfer practices.

Janßen, M., & Just, A. (2023, Juni).
On epistemic properties and field-specific logics - Exploring the potential of STS for the study of discipline-based knowledge transfer practices. Vortrag auf der Konferenz RRC and c:o/re international conference "Nowhere(to)land? What Science Studies Contribute to Science Communication", Bonn.

Wissenstransfer 2.0: Ganzheitliche Ansätze in Zeiten gesellschaftlicher Herausforderungen.

Janßen, M. (2023, Februar).
Teilnahme an der Podiumsdiskussion Wissenstransfer 2.0: Ganzheitliche Ansätze in Zeiten gesellschaftlicher Herausforderungen im Rahmen des Wissenstransfer-Talks der BMBF-Förderlinie „Forschung zum Wissenstransfer“, BMBF, online.

" Disziplinenspezifische Wissenstransferpraktiken: Erwartungen, Praktiken und Effekte des Wissenstransfers im disziplinären Vergleich " , Projektvorstellung/Interview.

Janßen, M. (2022).
"Disziplinenspezifische Wissenstransferpraktiken: Erwartungen, Praktiken und Effekte des Wissenstransfers im disziplinären Vergleich", Projektvorstellung/Interview. in der Rubrik "Nachgefragt – Neues aus den Projekten" des BMBF-Förderschwerpunkts "Wissenschafts- und Hochschulforschung", Berlin.

Contact person

Melike Janßen
Melike Janßen +49 30 2064177-60

Researchers

Annika Just

External Contact

, Robert K. Merton Zentrum (RMZ)

Funded by

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung