Artikel

Leider konnte für diese Suchkombination kein Ergebnis gefunden werden

Internationally mobile scientists as knowledge transmitters - A lexical-based approach to detect knowledge transfer.

Aman, V. (2019).
Internationally mobile scientists as knowledge transmitters - A lexical-based approach to detect knowledge transfer. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 2199-2208). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

The effects of research policies on the management of research information in HEIs: evidence from Germany.

Biesenbender, S., & Thiedig, C. (2019).
The effects of research policies on the management of research information in HEIs: evidence from Germany. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 2031-2036). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

Comparing institutional-level bibliometric indicator values based on different affiliation disambiguation systems. Benchmarking Web of Science and Scopus platform tools against a gold-standard data set for Germany.

Donner, P., Rimmert, C., & van Eck, N. J. (2019).
Comparing institutional-level bibliometric indicator values based on different affiliation disambiguation systems. Benchmarking Web of Science and Scopus platform tools against a gold-standard data set for Germany. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 1, (S. 306-315). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

Admitting uncertainty: a weighted socio-epistemic network approach to cognitive distance between authors.

Hartstein, J. (2019).
Admitting uncertainty: a weighted socio-epistemic network approach to cognitive distance between authors. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 2043-2052). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

How to interpret algorithmically constructed topical structures of research specialties? A case study comparing an internal and an external mapping of the topical structure of invasion biology.

Held, M., & Velden, T. (2019).
How to interpret algorithmically constructed topical structures of research specialties? A case study comparing an internal and an external mapping of the topical structure of invasion biology. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 1933-1939). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

The Impact of Research Funding Agencies on the Research Performance of five European Countries. A Funding Acknowledgements Analysis.

Möller, T. (2019).
The Impact of Research Funding Agencies on the Research Performance of five European Countries. A Funding Acknowledgements Analysis. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 2279-2287). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

Measurement variation in bibliometric impact indicators.

Stahlschmidt, S., & Schmidt, M. (2019).
Measurement variation in bibliometric impact indicators. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 1500-1506). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

Varying resonance chambers: A comparison of citation-based valuations of duplicated publications in Web of Science and Scopus.

Stahlschmidt, S., & Stephen, D. (2019).
Varying resonance chambers: A comparison of citation-based valuations of duplicated publications in Web of Science and Scopus. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 1698-1709). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

The social sciences and their publishers: Publication, reception and changing meaning of German monographs.

Thiedig, C. (2019).
The social sciences and their publishers: Publication, reception and changing meaning of German monographs. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H. F., & Ruocco, G (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), Vol. 2, (S. 2014-2019). Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

National Evaluation Systems and Universities' Strategic Capacities: Case Studies among European Universities.

Behrmann, L., & Sembritzki, T. (2019).
National Evaluation Systems and Universities' Strategic Capacities: Case Studies among European Universities. In Pritchard, R.M.O., O’Hara, M., Milsom, C., Williams, J., & Matei , L. (Hrsg.), The Three C-s of Higher Education. Competition, Collaboration and Complementarity (S. 107-130), Budapest/New York: Central European University Press.
ISBN 978-963-386-327-5
Abstract

The rise of international competition evokes different evaluation practices on a national and organisational level. Focussing on three National Evaluation Systems (NES) for universities in the UK, France, and Germany – this paper compares the role of evaluation for and in university governance. By providing insights into interviews with key actors of university governance, we present how NES produce knowledge, open up communication processes as well as scopes or limits of action in use for their strategies. This study comes to the conclusion that evaluations help organisational actors to operate strategically and that they foster the emergence of an organisational actorhood.

Punishing crimes of the mind: Sanctions for scientific misconduct as a case for the cultural theory of punishment.

Hesselmann, F. (2019).
Punishing crimes of the mind: Sanctions for scientific misconduct as a case for the cultural theory of punishment. Theoretical Criminology, 23 (4), 527–544.

How Do Educational Systems Affect Social Inequality of Educational Opportunities? The Role of Tracking in a Comparative Perspective.

Skopek, J., Triventi, M., & Buchholz, S. (2019).
How Do Educational Systems Affect Social Inequality of Educational Opportunities? The Role of Tracking in a Comparative Perspective. In R. Becker (Hrsg.) Research Handbook on the Sociology of Education (S. 214-232). Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

How practicioners between bench and bedside evaluate biomedical translation.

Simons, A., Hendriks, B., Reinhart, M., & Ahmed, F. (2019).
How practicioners between bench and bedside evaluate biomedical translation. SocArXiv [preprint]. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/srcma

Monetäre Erträge einer Promotion: Lohnunterschiede zwischen Promovierten und Nichtpromovierten in der Privatwirtschaft und im öffentlichen Dienst.

Trennt, F., & Euler, T. (2019).
Monetäre Erträge einer Promotion: Lohnunterschiede zwischen Promovierten und Nichtpromovierten in der Privatwirtschaft und im öffentlichen Dienst. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 71(2), 275–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-019-00619-5

Hochschulzugang und Studienerfolg von nicht-traditionellen Studierenden im Spiegel der amtlichen Statistik.

Dahm, G., Kerst, C, Kamm, C., Otto, A., & Wolter, A. (2019).
Hochschulzugang und Studienerfolg von nicht-traditionellen Studierenden im Spiegel der amtlichen Statistik. Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, 41(2), 8-32.
Abstract

Anknüpfend an die bildungspolitische Debatte zur Durchlässigkeit zwischen beruflicher und Hochschulbildung untersucht der Beitrag den Hochschulzugang und Studienerfolg von nicht-traditionellen Studierenden auf Basis der amtlichen Hochschulstatistik. Kern des Beitrags bilden Auswertungen zu zwei objektiven Indikatoren des Studienerfolgs: Schwund- und Erfolgsquoten sowie Studienleistungen in Form der Examensnoten. Das Ergebnis zeigt, dass trotz methodischer Einschränkungen mit den Daten der amtlichen Statistik wissenschaftlich und bildungspolitisch relevante Ergebnisse gewonnen werden können, die – trotz höherer Schwundquoten – einen vergleichbaren Studienerfolg traditioneller und nicht-traditioneller Studierender nahelegen.

Kontakt

Anja Gottburgsen
Dr. Anja Gottburgsen 0511 450670-912